On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 7:44 AM, Ed Day wrote:
> The patch is attached, further comments below.
Ah, I get it now! When you said, "The code that builds the command
should be modified to ensure the extension is present," I thought that
you meant that there was some problem with the build process.
The patch is attached, further comments below.
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 1:54 PM, Nick Mathewson wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 1:49 PM, Ed Day wrote:
>> Hi everyone,
>
> (Quick issue: you don't need to quote mails in your messages unless
> they are related to what you're talking about.)
Not sur
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 1:49 PM, Ed Day wrote:
> Hi everyone,
(Quick issue: you don't need to quote mails in your messages unless
they are related to what you're talking about.)
> I am new to the list. This post is in response to a posting last
> December on a Windows regression fork failure ([L
Hi everyone,
I am new to the list. This post is in response to a posting last
December on a Windows regression fork failure ([Libevent-users] Re:
Libevent 2.0.10-stable is released by Dongsheng Song). I noticed the
question was not answered and I recently experienced the same error
myself when t
