On Apr 30, 2012, at 7:49 PM, Nick Mathewson wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 7:17 PM, Ralph Castain wrote:
> [...]
>> The branch looks like it does the trick, and I like that it also does not
>> force the re-scan unless the newly activated event is a higher priority.
>>
>> +1 from me.
>>
>> M
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 7:17 PM, Ralph Castain wrote:
[...]
> The branch looks like it does the trick, and I like that it also does not
> force the re-scan unless the newly activated event is a higher priority.
>
> +1 from me.
>
> Meantime, I gather this was against the current 2.0 trunk as oppo
On Apr 30, 2012, at 5:10 PM, Nick Mathewson wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 6:45 PM, Ralph Castain wrote:
> [...]
>> I'll take a look at your branch, but had some further thoughts in the
>> interim. Would a more optimal option be to add the following logic to
>> event_priority_set:
>>
>> eve
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 6:45 PM, Ralph Castain wrote:
[...]
> I'll take a look at your branch, but had some further thoughts in the
> interim. Would a more optimal option be to add the following logic to
> event_priority_set:
>
> event_priority_set(ev, pri) {
> IF AND
> IF base> EQ
On Apr 30, 2012, at 4:38 PM, Nick Mathewson wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 4:48 PM, Ralph Castain wrote:
>>
>> On Apr 30, 2012, at 2:30 PM, Nick Mathewson wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 3:53 PM, Ralph Castain wrote:
Hi folks
I'm working with priorities in events using
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 4:48 PM, Ralph Castain wrote:
>
> On Apr 30, 2012, at 2:30 PM, Nick Mathewson wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 3:53 PM, Ralph Castain wrote:
>>> Hi folks
>>>
>>> I'm working with priorities in events using libevent 2.0.13. Since I'm not
>>> using the most current relea
On Apr 30, 2012, at 2:30 PM, Nick Mathewson wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 3:53 PM, Ralph Castain wrote:
>> Hi folks
>>
>> I'm working with priorities in events using libevent 2.0.13. Since I'm not
>> using the most current release, I thought I'd ask about a behavior we are
>> seeing that m
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 3:53 PM, Ralph Castain wrote:
> Hi folks
>
> I'm working with priorities in events using libevent 2.0.13. Since I'm not
> using the most current release, I thought I'd ask about a behavior we are
> seeing that might be a potential bug.
It's not the cause of your problem
OoO En ce début de soirée du lundi 30 avril 2012, vers 21:53, Ralph
Castain disait :
> I'm working with priorities in events using libevent 2.0.13. Since I'm
> not using the most current release, I thought I'd ask about a behavior
> we are seeing that might be a potential bug.
> I have atta
Hi folks
I'm working with priorities in events using libevent 2.0.13. Since I'm not
using the most current release, I thought I'd ask about a behavior we are
seeing that might be a potential bug.
I have attached a simple reproducer of the problem. In short, suppose I have
setup 8 priorities fo
10 matches
Mail list logo
