I'd be inclined to go with 3 too, it would be nice if all were
consistent as can be in the long run to avoid similar problems later.
It looks like NetBSD has returned EBADF here (sys_pipe.c:pipe_kqfilter)
since 2002 but it's a pretty easy change, maybe they'd like to make it
consistent. It sort of
On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 3:37 PM, Frank Denis wrote:
> Le Thu, Feb 09, 2012 at 03:23:32PM -0500, Nick Mathewson ecrivait :
>> On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 4:32 AM, Nicholas Marriott
>> I'm asking around; I'll let you know if anybody tells me they can test
>> NetBSD.
>
> $ ./a
> pipefd[0] = {4,5}
> pipefd
Le Thu, Feb 09, 2012 at 03:23:32PM -0500, Nick Mathewson ecrivait :
> On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 4:32 AM, Nicholas Marriott
> I'm asking around; I'll let you know if anybody tells me they can test NetBSD.
$ ./a
pipefd[0] = {4,5}
pipefd[1] = {6,7}
pipefd[2] = {8,9}
pipefd[3] = {10,11}
1 events:
9: fi
On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 4:32 AM, Nicholas Marriott
wrote:
> Ah, hmm... I've checked FreeBSD and it is the same, EPIPE, I don't have
> a NetBSD box but I might be able to set one up tomorrow night if nobody
> with one speaks up.
I'm asking around; I'll let you know if anybody tells me they can test
Ah, hmm... I've checked FreeBSD and it is the same, EPIPE, I don't have
a NetBSD box but I might be able to set one up tomorrow night if nobody
with one speaks up.
On Wed, Feb 08, 2012 at 09:16:41PM -0500, Nick Mathewson wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 12:19 PM, Nicholas Marriott
> wrote:
> >
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 12:19 PM, Nicholas Marriott
wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 08, 2012 at 11:37:45AM -0500, Nick Mathewson wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 1:47 PM, Nicholas Marriott
>> wrote:
>> > Forwarding this message to ML at Nick's request...
>> >
>> > Hi
>> >
>> > You may remember a few months a
On Wed, Feb 08, 2012 at 11:37:45AM -0500, Nick Mathewson wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 1:47 PM, Nicholas Marriott
> wrote:
> > Forwarding this message to ML at Nick's request...
> >
> > Hi
> >
> > You may remember a few months ago you fixed a problem with kqueue and
> > EPIPE on pipes - I backpo
On Wed, Feb 08, 2012 at 11:37:45AM -0500, Nick Mathewson wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 1:47 PM, Nicholas Marriott
> wrote:
> > Forwarding this message to ML at Nick's request...
> >
> > Hi
> >
> > You may remember a few months ago you fixed a problem with kqueue and
> > EPIPE on pipes - I backpo
Well, fix libevent because we can't debug Google Chrome. Pretty sure
libevent should try to be consistent here in what it does.
Chrome is so big it makes our gdb freak out when built with symbols so
it gets a little tricky... feel free to give it a go :-).
On Wed, Feb 08, 2012 at 08:42:32AM -08
.. wait, you mean "fix the OS because you can't debug google chrome" ? :-)
Adrian
***
To unsubscribe, send an e-mail to majord...@freehaven.net with
unsubscribe libevent-usersin the body.
On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 1:47 PM, Nicholas Marriott
wrote:
> Forwarding this message to ML at Nick's request...
>
> Hi
>
> You may remember a few months ago you fixed a problem with kqueue and
> EPIPE on pipes - I backported this fix to 1.4 and recently applied it to
> OpenBSD.
>
> However, this is
Forwarding this message to ML at Nick's request...
Hi
You may remember a few months ago you fixed a problem with kqueue and
EPIPE on pipes - I backported this fix to 1.4 and recently applied it to
OpenBSD.
However, this is causing problems with Google Chrome. From what we can
gather it appears t
12 matches
Mail list logo
