On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 8:10 PM, Nir Soffer wrote:
>
> On Jun 14, 2011, at 12:06 AM, Nick Mathewson wrote:
>> If you like my tweaks, I think this is a branch ready to merge onto 2.1.
>
> I think they are good.
>
> Why 2.1 and not next bug fix release for 2.0?
I guess it depends whether we decide
On Jun 14, 2011, at 12:06 AM, Nick Mathewson wrote:
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 8:38 PM, Nir Soffer wrote:
[...]
Also, there's another problem with my original patch. By my
logic, if
the buffer is empty and has no chains at all, then
evbuffer_ptr_set(buf, ptr, 0, EVBUFFER_PTR_SET) ought to work
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 8:38 PM, Nir Soffer wrote:
[...]
>> Also, there's another problem with my original patch. By my logic, if
>> the buffer is empty and has no chains at all, then
>> evbuffer_ptr_set(buf, ptr, 0, EVBUFFER_PTR_SET) ought to work, but
>> even with my patch it still doesn't. Mo
On Jun 9, 2011, at 3:38 AM, Nir Soffer wrote:
I think I have a working patch.
<0003-Allow-searching-up-to-the-end-of-the-buffer.patch>
This patch fixes a race condition when checking for the special "end
of buffer" ptr.
0004-Fix-race-codition-when-checking-for-the-special-end-.patch
De
On Jun 8, 2011, at 8:50 PM, Nick Mathewson wrote:
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 9:30 AM, Nir Soffer wrote:
On Jun 7, 2011, at 4:03 AM, Nick Mathewson wrote:
On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 8:37 PM, Nir Soffer wrote:
Here's another patch that might make stuff work. Before I'd apply
it,
I'd like to hav
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 9:30 AM, Nir Soffer wrote:
>
> On Jun 7, 2011, at 4:03 AM, Nick Mathewson wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 8:37 PM, Nir Soffer wrote:
>> Here's another patch that might make stuff work. Before I'd apply it,
>> I'd like to have a look through everything that's using
>> ev
On Jun 7, 2011, at 5:01 PM, Andrew W. Nosenko wrote:
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 16:30, Nir Soffer wrote:
On Jun 7, 2011, at 4:03 AM, Nick Mathewson wrote:
On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 8:37 PM, Nir Soffer wrote:
Here's another patch that might make stuff work. Before I'd apply
it,
I'd like to ha
On Jun 7, 2011, at 4:03 AM, Nick Mathewson wrote:
On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 8:37 PM, Nir Soffer wrote:
Here's another patch that might make stuff work. Before I'd apply it,
I'd like to have a look through everything that's using
evbuffer_ptr_set() and evbuffer_ptr right now to make sure that
not
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 16:30, Nir Soffer wrote:
>
> On Jun 7, 2011, at 4:03 AM, Nick Mathewson wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 8:37 PM, Nir Soffer wrote:
>> Here's another patch that might make stuff work. Before I'd apply it,
>> I'd like to have a look through everything that's using
>> evbu
On Jun 7, 2011, at 4:03 AM, Nick Mathewson wrote:
On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 8:37 PM, Nir Soffer wrote:
Here's another patch that might make stuff work. Before I'd apply it,
I'd like to have a look through everything that's using
evbuffer_ptr_set() and evbuffer_ptr right now to make sure that
not
On Jun 7, 2011, at 4:03 AM, Nick Mathewson wrote:
On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 8:37 PM, Nir Soffer wrote:
Hi,
I found that evbuffer_search_range fails when you try search the
last byte
with a non null end pointer.
You can work around this by checking the buffer length and calling
evbuffer_sear
On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 8:37 PM, Nir Soffer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I found that evbuffer_search_range fails when you try search the last byte
> with a non null end pointer.
>
> You can work around this by checking the buffer length and calling
> evbuffer_search() instead, or evbuffer_search_range with a
Hi,
I found that evbuffer_search_range fails when you try search the last
byte with a non null end pointer.
You can work around this by checking the buffer length and calling
evbuffer_search() instead, or evbuffer_search_range with a null end
pointer.
I don't know how to fix it yet, but
13 matches
Mail list logo
