Re: [Libevent-users] Asynchronous writes in the event loop model

2012-02-06 Thread Frank Schoep
On 1 feb 2012, at 23:31, Nick Mathewson wrote: > … [ questions about POSIX signals and pthreads ] … > … > Sadly, this whole business is a huge pile of gunk. Thanks for the epic reply, Nick. I did some additional research before diving into my POSIX signal plan and it indeed looks like a huge mes

Re: [Libevent-users] Asynchronous writes in the event loop model

2012-01-22 Thread Frank Schoep
On 19 jan 2012, at 21:53, Nick Mathewson wrote: > … > The usual way is with events that you manually activate. You'll need > to use libevent 2 for threading support, and call one of the > appropriate functions at startup time to turn on threading support. I've been thinking about this over the pa

[Libevent-users] Re: [Libevent-users] Re: [Libevent-users] Re: [Libevent-users] Security question [was: Asynchronous writes…]

2012-01-21 Thread Frank Schoep
On 20 jan 2012, at 17:17, Nick Mathewson wrote: > … > As a defense-in-depth mechanism, I'd say "sure, go ahead", but IMO > you'd get more benefit against as-yet-unknown vulnerabilities with the > usual techniques, like non-executable heap/stack, randomized address > spaces, etc. Thanks again for t

[Libevent-users] Re: [Libevent-users] Security question [was: Asynchronous writes…]

2012-01-20 Thread Frank Schoep
On 19 jan 2012, at 22:00, MigueL DíaZ wrote: > … > I'd second that idea. Unless you intend to use the same code/protocol you use > for you inter-thread communication in a network environment, using evbuffer > might be just an overkill. Thanks for the tips, Nick and Miguel – they made me rethink

[Libevent-users] Asynchronous writes in the event loop model

2012-01-19 Thread Frank Schoep
main problem I have is conceptual: how can I create an application where clients are notified of 'events' that happen outside of a libevent event loop. I would like to (re)use as much of libevent as possible. Thanks in advance for your time everyone, I'll gladly elaborate if so d