Re: [Libevent-users] Adding ipv6 support.

On Feb 7, 2011, at 13:02 , Simon Perreault wrote: Furthermore, you're ignoring alignment issues. What potential alignment problem can occur with the union that Dave proposes? My understanding is that C compilers will ensure that the union is aligned to the largest member, so my understandin

Re: [Libevent-users] Threaded event bases

o: it triggers a specific callback in an event_loop, which can be across threads. I use this in one program to implement a thread pool: I have a "main" event_loop which does most network I/O processing, then I use event_active to pass some specific tasks to other t threads. Evan --

Re: [Libevent-users] Threaded event bases

, and using event_active() to "trigger" an event to be run in another thread. This doesn't really address the multi-threading issue though, since it is a fair amount of manual work. Evan -- Evan Jones http

Re: [Libevent-users] Does EV_PERSIST with a timeout work differently on 1.x and 2.x versions?

timeout. Hope this helps, Evan Jones -- Evan Jones http://evanjones.ca/ *** To unsubscribe, send an e-mail to majord...@freehaven.net with unsubscribe libevent-usersin the body.

Re: [Libevent-users] event_base_loop: wait for events to be added by other threads?

This seems like a good interpretation, and makes sense now that I think about it. ONCE|NONBLOCK doesn't seem reasonable to me atm. Adding an event_err() for that combination might make sense then? Evan -- Evan Jones http://evanjones.ca/ *

[Libevent-users] event_base_loop: wait for events to be added by other threads?

VLOOP_NONBLOCK; poll the loop once, run highest priority, then exit 11 = EVLOOP_BLOCK_FOR_EXPLICIT_EXIT; run until there is an explicit exit. Thanks, Evan Jones -- Evan Jones http://evanjones.ca/ *** To unsubscribe, send