On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 1:24 PM, Diwaker Gupta wrote:
> From
> http://www.wangafu.net/~nickm/libevent-book/Ref6a_advanced_bufferevents.html:
>
> "Note that when BEV_OPT_CLOSE_ON_FREE is set on a SSL bufferevent, a
> clean shutdown will not be performed on the SSL connection. This has
> two problem
>From
>http://www.wangafu.net/~nickm/libevent-book/Ref6a_advanced_bufferevents.html:
"Note that when BEV_OPT_CLOSE_ON_FREE is set on a SSL bufferevent, a
clean shutdown will not be performed on the SSL connection. This has
two problems: first, the connection will seem to have been "broken" by
the
> I haven't measured the performance difference, but I suspect it's
> real. The filtering case involves another layer of buffering,
> copying, and callbacks, and those typically matter. Then again, it
> could be that crypto dominates the performance. In either case,
> there's less machinery to g
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 2:20 PM, Diwaker Gupta wrote:
> I'm trying to figure out the best practice when it comes to OpenSSL
> based bufferevents. For reference, I'm looking at the source code as
> well as
> http://www.wangafu.net/~nickm/libevent-book/Ref6a_advanced_bufferevents.html
>
> As backgro
