Hi, Nick,
Thanks for your reply. It's very helpful.
Thanks and Regards,
Wenliang
On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 12:12 AM, Nick Mathewson wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 5:37 AM, Wenliang Zhang wrote:
> > Hi, all,
>
> Personally, my first approach would be to do it with something closer
> to a re
I'd be inclined to go with 3 too, it would be nice if all were
consistent as can be in the long run to avoid similar problems later.
It looks like NetBSD has returned EBADF here (sys_pipe.c:pipe_kqfilter)
since 2002 but it's a pretty easy change, maybe they'd like to make it
consistent. It sort of
On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 3:37 PM, Frank Denis wrote:
> Le Thu, Feb 09, 2012 at 03:23:32PM -0500, Nick Mathewson ecrivait :
>> On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 4:32 AM, Nicholas Marriott
>> I'm asking around; I'll let you know if anybody tells me they can test
>> NetBSD.
>
> $ ./a
> pipefd[0] = {4,5}
> pipefd
Le Thu, Feb 09, 2012 at 03:23:32PM -0500, Nick Mathewson ecrivait :
> On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 4:32 AM, Nicholas Marriott
> I'm asking around; I'll let you know if anybody tells me they can test NetBSD.
$ ./a
pipefd[0] = {4,5}
pipefd[1] = {6,7}
pipefd[2] = {8,9}
pipefd[3] = {10,11}
1 events:
9: fi
On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 4:32 AM, Nicholas Marriott
wrote:
> Ah, hmm... I've checked FreeBSD and it is the same, EPIPE, I don't have
> a NetBSD box but I might be able to set one up tomorrow night if nobody
> with one speaks up.
I'm asking around; I'll let you know if anybody tells me they can test
Ah, hmm... I've checked FreeBSD and it is the same, EPIPE, I don't have
a NetBSD box but I might be able to set one up tomorrow night if nobody
with one speaks up.
On Wed, Feb 08, 2012 at 09:16:41PM -0500, Nick Mathewson wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 12:19 PM, Nicholas Marriott
> wrote:
> >
