On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 9:58 AM, Leonid Evdokimov wrote:
> Here are some patches.
>
> 0001 fires without following fixes
I like it; applying with a few comments and style tweaks.
(The style tweak is that I generally do
"struct foo *bar;" rather than "struct foo* bar;"
because in C syntax, the
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 2:50 PM, Leonid Evdokimov wrote:
> One more cornercase - reply that has no answers at all should be
> treated as NODATA too. It is not malformed message.
Right you are. Merging!
--
Nick
***
To unsubscri
One more cornercase - reply that has no answers at all should be
treated as NODATA too. It is not malformed message.
--
WBRBW, Leonid Evdokimov
xmpp:l...@darkk.net.ru && http://darkk.net.ru
tel:+79816800702 && tel:+79050965222
From 1cd900a52536fb5294f6c13fa759730ea73574a6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> Any chance of a unit test on this one?
Better late then never :)
--
WBRBW, Leonid Evdokimov
xmpp:l...@darkk.net.ru && http://darkk.net.ru
tel:+79816800702 && tel:+79050965222
From 505d1539e0436355e82054a515d4fabdc6a20e85 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Leonid Evdokimov
Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 22
Here are some patches.
0001 fires without following fixes
aff6ba1 Fix request_finished memory leak with debugging turned on.
9b724b2 Fix evsig_dealloc memory leak with debugging turned on.
0002 is just a preparation for 0003
0003 fires with current codebase but, seems, it should not. I'm sorry,
