To use libevent with normal files (as opposed to sockets), you need to
ensure a backend which supports normal files is used, something like:
evcfg = event_config_new();
if (NULL == evcfg) {
printf("%s: event_config_new() failed!\n", progname);
return
Dear List,
I am currently taking my first steps in experimenting with libevent. To
do that, I have written the small example below that should copy a file.
I am currently trying to restrict myself to the core functions, and I
know that the buffer handling is too primitive.
I am trying the co
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 6:11 PM, Graham Leggett wrote:
> On 30 Aug 2011, at 11:54 PM, Nick Mathewson wrote:
>
>> Folks have submitted patches, and I commented on the patches to
>> suggest revisions, and they never revised. I can try to look more
>> closely in the future.
>
> I did find this mentio
On Thu, Sep 01, 2011 at 11:34:11AM -0500, Nulik Nol wrote:
> But ... I think it is over for me with SQL type databases. There is a
> big movement going on on non-relational databases and I think it is
> time to change.
Most if not all (widely used) relational databases these days expose some type
> FWIW, the PostgreSQL C client API works non-blocking. It's quite well
> designed.
>
Thanks!
But ... I think it is over for me with SQL type databases. There is a
big movement going on on non-relational databases and I think it is
time to change.
I came across GT.M database. It was commercial but
On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 18:58, Nick Mathewson wrote:
> Any chance of a unit test on this one?
Sure. I'll try to grok tinytest this week.
***
To unsubscribe, send an e-mail to majord...@freehaven.net with
unsubscribe libevent-users
On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 10:47 AM, Leonid Evdokimov wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 18:36, Nick Mathewson wrote:
>> When you say
>> + if ((flags & 0x020f) && (flags & 0x020f) != DNS_ERR_NOTEXIST) {
>> + /* there was an error and it's not NXDOMAIN */
>>
>> I don't see how (flags
On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 18:36, Nick Mathewson wrote:
> When you say
> + if ((flags & 0x020f) && (flags & 0x020f) != DNS_ERR_NOTEXIST) {
> + /* there was an error and it's not NXDOMAIN */
>
> I don't see how (flags & 0x020f) != DNS_ERR_NOTEXIST could ever be
> false. DNS_ERR_NOT
On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 4:57 AM, Leonid Evdokimov wrote:
> RFC 2308 says a lot about negative answer caching.
>
> Here is patch, that discloses TTL of negative answer (if possible) to
> the library user.
>
Hi, Leonid! One concern:
When you say
+ if ((flags & 0x020f) && (flags & 0x020f) != D
RFC 2308 says a lot about negative answer caching.
Here is patch, that discloses TTL of negative answer (if possible) to
the library user.
--
WBRBW, Leonid Evdokimov
xmpp:l...@darkk.net.ru && http://darkk.net.ru
tel:+79816800702 && tel:+79050965222
From c903d9db417d2d8478eb7371e46dbc5ef60f650b Mo
10 matches
Mail list logo
