Thanks for your reply.
My sample code is like as yours.
I have try some release functions are mentioned in Openssl faq (
http://www.openssl.org/support/faq.html#PROG13) , but nothing improve.
The memory usage is different between 'summary of valgrind' and 'top'.
And I cannot locate the 'lost' mem
2011/2/21 林宇舜 Yu-Shun Lin :
> Hi all,
>
> I construct SSL connection by using
> bev1 = bufferevent_socket_new(... fd ..., BEV_OPT_CLOSE_ON_FREE)
> bev2 = bufferevent_openssl_filter_new(... bev ..., BEV_OPT_CLOSE_ON_FREE)
> bufferevent_setcb(bev2, read_cb, ..., event_cb...)
> And close connect
On Sun, Mar 6, 2011 at 2:43 PM, Nick Mathewson wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 5, 2011 at 4:59 AM, Christophe Fillot wrote:
> [...]
>> I guess this behavior is related to the epoll mechanism.
>>
>
> Hi, Christophe! I just tried your code and found out that the bug
> does not appear on OSX 10.5 at all, but
On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 9:17 AM, Christophe Fillot wrote:
>
> It seems that the patch was corrupted in my previous email, here the
> correct version.
When I apply this patch, the unit tests don't pass any more. I get:
rpc/basic_test: [forking] OK
rpc/basic_message: [forking] OK
rpc/basic_client:
