On Wed, Jan 19, 2011, Nick Mathewson wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 12:34 AM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> > It's best to assume browsers don't do the right thing in 100% of cases.
> >
> > (Been there, done that with Squid..)
>
> Ick. Okay, what does Squid (or some other sensible application)
> assum
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011, Nick Mathewson wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 12:34 AM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> > It's best to assume browsers don't do the right thing in 100% of cases.
> >
> > (Been there, done that with Squid..)
>
> Ick. Okay, what does Squid (or some other sensible application)
> assum
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 12:34 AM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> It's best to assume browsers don't do the right thing in 100% of cases.
>
> (Been there, done that with Squid..)
Ick. Okay, what does Squid (or some other sensible application)
assume constitutes a valid URI?
(I wonder whether this argues
