Re: [Libevent-users] What was EV_PRI for in 1.4.12?

2010-10-04 Thread Daniel Janzon
> This is probably a modified version of libevent, libevent doesn't support > PRI events, eg EPOLLPRI for epoll. Some drivers I was using use this event, > so I had to modify my copy of 1.4.13-stable to support it. Someone at your > end Daniel has probably done the same and if you just upgrade to t

Re: [Libevent-users] What was EV_PRI for in 1.4.12?

2010-10-04 Thread Tristan Wilson
On 5/10/2010 8:19 AM, Nick Mathewson wrote: On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 5:01 PM, Daniel Janzon wrote: Hello, I have some old code linked against libevent 1.4.12, but I want to upgrade to the latest version. However, it didn't compile unless I removed the EV_PRI bit in event_set. It doesn't seem to

Re: [Libevent-users] What was EV_PRI for in 1.4.12?

2010-10-04 Thread Nick Mathewson
On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 5:01 PM, Daniel Janzon wrote: > Hello, > > I have some old code linked against libevent 1.4.12, but I want to > upgrade to the latest version. However, it didn't compile unless I > removed the EV_PRI bit in event_set. It doesn't seem to exist in later > code, I grepped for i

[Libevent-users] What was EV_PRI for in 1.4.12?

2010-10-04 Thread Daniel Janzon
Hello, I have some old code linked against libevent 1.4.12, but I want to upgrade to the latest version. However, it didn't compile unless I removed the EV_PRI bit in event_set. It doesn't seem to exist in later code, I grepped for it. I was doing event_set(..., EV_PRI | EV_PERSIST, ...) but had

Re: [Libevent-users] 14k vprintf evbuffer on solaris

2010-10-04 Thread Nick Mathewson
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 5:34 PM, Michael Herf wrote: [...] > Has anyone else seen a failure case like this? (I'm going to dig in and see > what I can find.) I haven't seen this before, no. One way to try to debug this would be to check would be to figure out where, along the chain between you a