On 2010-09-09 17:28, Simon Perreault wrote:
> Would this be the right fix?
Argh, git-send-email didn't do what I wanted it to do. Here's the patch
in attachment. Sorry.
Simon
--
NAT64/DNS64 open-source --> http://ecdysis.viagenie.ca
STUN/TURN server--> http://numb.viagenie.ca
vCard 4.0
Would this be the right fix?
***
To unsubscribe, send an e-mail to majord...@freehaven.net with
unsubscribe libevent-usersin the body.
Hello,
I do this:
bufev = bufferevent_socket_new(...);
bufferevent_setcb(bufev, foo, ...);
bufferevent_setwatermark(bufev, EV_READ, ...);
When input exceeding the read watermark is received, foo() is called
even though I did not call bufferevent_enable(bufev, EV_READ).
Why is this?
Inside foo(
Hello again!
Thanks to many people's hard work, Libevent 2.0 has now had its second
release candidate. You can download it from the Sourceforge site at:
https://sourceforge.net/projects/levent/files/libevent/libevent-2.0/libevent-2.0.7-rc.tar.gz/download
There's also a pgp signature of it (b
Hi folks,
First off, let me preface this in terms that I've used 1.x libevent
a bit in the past but given the 2.x release candidate I'm experimenting
with, I can't say what is proper and what is actually a bug. So, with that
in mind I'm not certain if this is me using things incorrectly o
