Re: [Libevent-users] A patch for evrpc, allowing extra argument of request_new and reply_new

2010-04-14 Thread Dan Kegel
Can you add a build step that verifies the abi has not changed? On Apr 14, 2010 11:30 AM, "Nick Mathewson" wrote: On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 11:42 AM, Shuo Chen wrote: > Another patch to make lib... Hi! I've chatted with Niels, and checked in your patches. I'm not as familiar with the rpc code a

Re: [Libevent-users] evutil_closesocket() macro portability.

2010-04-14 Thread Nick Mathewson
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 5:05 AM, Sebastian Sjöberg wrote: > On Apr 14, 2010, at 7:39 AM, Nick Mathewson wrote: > >> On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 6:21 AM, Sebastian Sjöberg >> wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> The EVUTIL_CLOSESOCKET() macro requires you to include unistd.h in your >>> source for linux and I don'

Re: [Libevent-users] When will libevent 2.x be released?

2010-04-14 Thread Nick Mathewson
On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 10:03 PM, Angus Salkeld wrote: > Hi > > We are quite keen to use libevent for corosync (corosync.org) > but wish to use the 2.x branch as our daemon is very threaded. > > When do you hope to release the 2.x branch? > > Note: there is no pressure we just want to plan when to

Re: [Libevent-users] A patch for evrpc, allowing extra argument of request_new and reply_new

2010-04-14 Thread Nick Mathewson
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 11:42 AM, Shuo Chen wrote: > Another patch to make libevent2 working with Google protocol buffers. > It provides access to the evrpc_req_generic struct members. > http://evproto.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/libevent-2.0.4-alpha-get-request-reply.patch > > To be applied after th

Re: [Libevent-users] evutil_closesocket() macro portability.

2010-04-14 Thread Sebastian Sjöberg
On Apr 14, 2010, at 7:39 AM, Nick Mathewson wrote: > On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 6:21 AM, Sebastian Sjöberg > wrote: >> Hi, >> >> The EVUTIL_CLOSESOCKET() macro requires you to include unistd.h in your >> source for linux and I don't know what on windows. To ease portablilty >> wouldn't it be nice