https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=461536
Bug ID: 461536
Summary: when selecting "excluse entries" from the "entries by
payee", Names don't get exported in csv
Classification: Applications
Product: kmymoney
Version: 5.1.3
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=461536
Martin Tlustos changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|WAITINGFORINFO |---
Status|NEEDSINFO
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=461536
--- Comment #3 from Martin Tlustos ---
Created attachment 153572
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=153572&action=edit
screenshot with unexpected behavior
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=461536
--- Comment #4 from Martin Tlustos ---
i tried switching to English, thinking it might be a problem with German, but
it stays the same.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=461536
Martin Tlustos changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|WAITINGFORINFO |---
Status|NEEDSINFO
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=461536
--- Comment #9 from Martin Tlustos ---
I can dm you the kmymoney file if you want.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=351274
--- Comment #4 from Martin Tlustos ---
It's probably very difficult to do, as a lot of payees will clutter the report.
Anyway, nothing has changed. I'd propose it'd be marked as "won't fix" and
close the report
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=351274
--- Comment #6 from Martin Tlustos ---
Well, the easiest way is to just enable a graphical view of the already
available "transactions by payee". That of course would seriously clutter the
chart with too many lines, but one could adjust the filter/sort
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=351274
--- Comment #7 from Martin Tlustos ---
And, additionally, if there was a possibility to select/deselect payees on the
right or left side of the report, right in the graphical view, that would make
it easier to check specific people.
Another way would be
