https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=351535
Antoine T changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=463854
--- Comment #3 from Antoine T ---
I am closing this ticket as I didn't see I have opened a duplicate ticket
#351535 in 2015 (!).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=463854
Antoine T changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|REPORTED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=351535
--- Comment #9 from Antoine T ---
*** Bug 463854 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=463854
--- Comment #5 from Antoine T ---
Please note that there is an error in the test scenario I have written in
description. I said it is an OFX file while describing a QIF file. The test
scenario of the issue is actually with a QIF file, because there is n
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=351535
--- Comment #10 from Jack ---
Antoine, I'm a bit confused. Is the bug currently that when doing a QIF import
with 5.1.2, if the Payee is changed based on matching rules, you lose the
information in the original field? I know for sure this was fixed in
