On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 6:52 AM, aga wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Jun 2013 00:34:31 -0300
> Alvaro Soliverez wrote:
>
>> From when I had to work on it during the porting days, I can tell the
>> ledger view is full of weird widgets. It needs a revamp to remove all
>> the crust (we even found KDE 2.x code i
On Fri, 21 Jun 2013 00:34:31 -0300
Alvaro Soliverez wrote:
> From when I had to work on it during the porting days, I can tell the
> ledger view is full of weird widgets. It needs a revamp to remove all
> the crust (we even found KDE 2.x code in there).
> But... it is the most complicated view in
>From when I had to work on it during the porting days, I can tell the
ledger view is full of weird widgets. It needs a revamp to remove all
the crust (we even found KDE 2.x code in there).
But... it is the most complicated view in the app, so it will take a
lot of dev time that we don't have at th
On 2013.06.20 19:16, aga wrote:
Is there a major reason why the column widths behave the way they do?
It doesn't seem very logical to me at the moment, or in fact ever.
A slight silly, but not untypical, example is that if I choose to use
a complex system for check numbers, such that the who
Is there a major reason why the column widths behave the way they do?
It doesn't seem very logical to me at the moment, or in fact ever.
A slight silly, but not untypical, example is that if I choose to use a
complex system for check numbers, such that the whole number is not
visible, the only way
