Hi all,
On Monday 21 July 2014 08:39:11 Alvaro Soliverez wrote:
> I'm all for it, the cmake buildfiles were put together back in KDE3
> days, and then hacked more and more during the port to KDE4, when KDE
> SC 4.4 was current.
Same here. Go for it.
--
Regards
Thomas Baumgart
GPG-FP: E55E D
2014-07-21 13:59 GMT+03:00 Christian Dávid :
> Hi Cristian,
>
> I like that! In fact I just used that coding style already in the online
> banking branch.
Nice :), one of the reasons I've asked first is that I was thinking
about your work in the online banking branch. I wouldn't want to cause
too
Hi Cristian,
I like that! In fact I just used that coding style already in the online
banking branch.
Greetings
Chris
On 21. Juli 2014 09:50:14 MESZ, "Cristian Oneț" wrote:
>I'm thinking that we should apply this coding style [1] which is used
>in other parts of KDE. While looking at the CMak
2014-07-21 14:39 GMT+03:00 Alvaro Soliverez :
> I'm all for it, the cmake buildfiles were put together back in KDE3
> days, and then hacked more and more during the port to KDE4, when KDE
> SC 4.4 was current.
>
> How do you propose to handle it?
I've been looking for some scripts that do this, fo
I'm all for it, the cmake buildfiles were put together back in KDE3
days, and then hacked more and more during the port to KDE4, when KDE
SC 4.4 was current.
How do you propose to handle it?
Regards,
Alvaro
On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 4:50 AM, Cristian Oneț wrote:
> Hi,
>
> While working with the b
Hi,
While working with the build system files these days I've noticed that
there is a pretty big mess there. This is because the CMakeLists.txt
files didn't received that much attention since they were created back
in the KDE3 days when they existed alongside the automake build
system.
I'm thinki
