https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=340956
Jack changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ostroffjh@users.sourceforge
|
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=340956
--- Comment #6 from Dr.Edgar Alwers ---
exactly OK, what you say.. The program is not detecting duplicate statements.
I send two test files. Test1.kmy was created with KMM-4.6.4., starting from
November 10th. Test2.kmy is Test1.kmy read by KMM-4.7.1 and
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=340956
--- Comment #5 from Dr.Edgar Alwers ---
Created attachment 89599
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=89599&action=edit
Test2.kmy performed with KMM-4.7.1
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
__
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=340956
--- Comment #4 from Dr.Edgar Alwers ---
Created attachment 89598
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=89598&action=edit
Test.kmy performed with KMM-4.6.4
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=340956
--- Comment #3 from Jack ---
I am assuming that by actualisation you mean download. (I seem to recall
someone once using that term for reconciliation, which is a completely
different issue.) A downloaded transaction will only ever match a manually
ent
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=340956
--- Comment #2 from Dr.Edgar Alwers ---
Thank you for your hint to the Bug 315072, which I have studied now a little.
However, concerning your example:
I did not enter manually a transaction. The first transaction is the result of
a bank OFX actualis
