On 31.03.2014 08:46, Cristian Oneț wrote:
> We still need to move the user compliments section and maybe some
> other stuff, anyway I'll check this and get back to you when I think
> that it's OK to perform the switch. One question though before moving
> the tarballs to KDE infrastructure: dos it h
There probably are statistics, since it is a CDN, but they won't be
easily available like we had in sourceforge.
I'll check with the sysadmins.
Regards,
Alvaro
On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 3:46 AM, Cristian Oneț wrote:
> We still need to move the user compliments section and maybe some other
> stuff
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=332793
--- Comment #6 from allan ---
On 31/03/14 07:45, Thomas Baumgart wrote:
> https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=332793
>
> --- Comment #5 from Thomas Baumgart ---
> Watched the video and noticed, that the amount field gets filled with 0.00
> when
> the
On 31/03/14 07:45, Thomas Baumgart wrote:
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=332793
--- Comment #5 from Thomas Baumgart ---
Watched the video and noticed, that the amount field gets filled with 0.00 when
the category changes. This is unexpected and causes the problem. I tried the
following wh
Hello!
Am Sonntag, 30. März 2014, 19:08:08 schrieb Jack:
> > It would appear in KDE you need to pollute your application name
> > space to debug a plugin which means you cannot simultaneously have a
> > devel version and a release version running at the same time.
>
> Ah, you have run into on
Hi Jack
Thanks for the reply.
I suspect most developers work in a VM, under windows that means a slow
machine and the cost of a license. So I wont be doing that. I could just
develop in a kde linux platform but as I want to make specific changes to
suit Aussie small businesses who mostly work
Hi Jack,
You should open an issue for this so it won't get lost. If numbers are
sorted alphabetically then that's always a bug and it's not that hard to
fix it.
Regards,
Cristian
2014-03-31 1:09 GMT+03:00 Jack :
> Actually, I don't remember if this has been mentioned in the past or not.
>
> On