I have been looking at the KMYMoney and it looks like a great software. I
used Quicken until 1997 and got tired of their requirements and quirks.
I have several questions
1. I had a hard time finding who to contact with a question
2. It was mentioned about KDE ready desktop or somet
> On Jan. 8, 2013, 9:02 p.m., Alvaro Soliverez wrote:
> > I say the rationale is sound, the payee should not affect the button state.
> > But it would be good to know why the schedule name is not checked when
> > updating the button states
Sorry, I accidentally skirted round that by commenting
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/107619/#review25008
---
This review has been submitted with commit
17f7dc1505f26098086
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/107714/#review25007
---
I say the rationale is sound, the payee should not affect the b
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/107714/#review25006
---
Any thoughts, please?
- Allan Anderson
On Dec. 14, 2012, 10
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/107619/#review25005
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Alvaro Soliverez
On Jan. 3, 2013, 7:45
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/107619/#review25001
---
Ship it!
In my opinion the patch is ready to be shipped. Good
> On Jan. 3, 2013, 6:55 p.m., Łukasz Maszczyński wrote:
> > Good, the tests are getting more and more readable with every update.
>
> Marko Käning wrote:
> I see now that also testTwoInstitutions() and testOneInstitution() are
> interfering, like my tests did before.
> These two tests a
> On Jan. 3, 2013, 6:55 p.m., Łukasz Maszczyński wrote:
> > Good, the tests are getting more and more readable with every update.
>
> Marko Käning wrote:
> I see now that also testTwoInstitutions() and testOneInstitution() are
> interfering, like my tests did before.
> These two tests a
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=312877
Bug ID: 312877
Summary: Can create duplicate account
Classification: Unclassified
Product: kmymoney4
Version: git master
Hardware: Ubuntu Packages
OS: Linux
Status: CO
On 08/01/13 12:39, Alvaro Soliverez wrote:
It seems wrong. Are you sure it's not prevented by the engine?
OTOH, perhaps it's allowed only for imports, in order to allow an import
from apps with looser rules.
Regards,
Alvaro
No, and mymoneystatementreader.cpp is used not just for imports. I c
It seems wrong. Are you sure it's not prevented by the engine?
OTOH, perhaps it's allowed only for imports, in order to allow an import
from apps with looser rules.
Regards,
Alvaro
On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 9:28 AM, Allan wrote:
> I notice that it seems possible, both in mymoneystatementreader.cp
I notice that it seems possible, both in mymoneystatementreader.cpp and
in mymoneyqifreader.cpp, to create an account with the same name and
type as an existing account.
Should that be? It seems wrong to me.
Allan
___
KMyMoney-devel mailing list
KMy
13 matches
Mail list logo
