Thank you! Makes sense. I removed the duplicate product ID at the end of
the patch. I'll upload this together with bug 1491070.
** Changed in: bcmwl (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed
Thanks! Uploaded.
** Changed in: bcmwl (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to bcmwl in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1491070
Title:
On removal the package should warn a re
** Also affects: dkms (Ubuntu Wily)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: dkms (Ubuntu Trusty)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to dkms in Ubuntu.
https://bugs
Public bug reported:
While testing the unstable kernel PPA with linux-image-4.4.0-0-generic
on ppc64el, autopkgtests often fail with this kernel crash on boot:
ubuntu@juju-prod-ues-proposed-migration-machine-12:~⟫ nova console-log
adt-xenial-ppc64el-systemd-20151207-161711
SLOF[0m[?25l
***
** Tags added: bot-stop-nagging
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => New
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.la
Yes, it is a regression. Andy found the offending commit and the fix is
already queued in Tejun's tree, so this should get fixed with the next
upstream update.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.l
** Changed in: dkms (Ubuntu Trusty)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Martin Pitt (pitti)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to dkms in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1303275
Title:
dkms_packages.py crashed w
Version comparison between the two builds:
- libseccomp-dev: Both versions built against 2.2.3-2ubuntu1
- libc6-dev: 2.21-0ubuntu4 → 2.21-0ubuntu5
- linux-libc-dev: 4.2.0-19.23 → 4.3.0-2.11
- binutils: 2.25.51.20151113-2ubuntu1 → 2.25.90.20151209-1ubuntu1
- gcc-5: 5.2.1-24ubuntu3 → 5.3.1-3ubu
For the record: if someone bisects this, I strongly advise to build
systemd in a pre-created schroot with
CFLAGS="-g -O0" DEB_BUILD_FLAGS=nocheck dpkg-buildpackage -Pnoudeb
-us -uc -b -j4
which will only take some 3 minutes, instead of 20 .
--
You received this bug notification because you a
I tried in the forward direction: linux-libc-dev 4.3.0-4.13 still fails,
and that's the latest xenial one (4.3.0-5.14 is not built yet).
I also tried 4.4.0-0.5 in the unstable PPA (https://launchpad.net
/~canonical-kernel-team/+archive/ubuntu/unstable/+build/8438036) and it
still fails.
** Change
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
** Tags added: bot-stop-nagging
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1526358
Title:
xenial/i386 regression: nspaw
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 559127 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/559127
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 559127
various packages failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: unable to make
backup link of before installing new version: Input/output error
--
You rec
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 559127 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/559127
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 559127
various packages failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: unable to make
backup link of before installing new version: Input/output error
--
You rec
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 559127 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/559127
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 559127
various packages failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: unable to make
backup link of before installing new version: Input/output error
--
You rec
I further bisected it down to adding this line to /usr/include/i386
-linux-gnu/asm/unistd_32.h:
#define __NR_socket 359
if I drop just that and rebuild systemd, seccomp/nspawn work again.
While systemd does define some syscalls for some more obscure platforms
in https://github.com/systemd/syst
I tried to #undef __NR_socket in the systemd sources, to see where this
value is actually being used. Turns out it is in
https://github.com/systemd/systemd/blob/master/src/nspawn/nspawn.c#L1577
in setup_seccomp():
r = seccomp_rule_add(
seccomp,
I now isolated this seccomp failure into a tiny .c file which reproduces
this. On amd64 it works:
$ gcc -o /tmp/o ~/seccomp-socket-filter.c -lseccomp && /tmp/o
SCMP_SYS(socket) == 41 == 29
Success
and on i386 it reproduces the error:
$ gcc -o /tmp/o ~/seccomp-socket-filter.c -lseccomp && /tmp/o
Forgot to attach the simplified file..
** Attachment added: "simpler standalone reproducer C file"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libseccomp/+bug/1526358/+attachment/4535518/+files/seccomp-socket-filter.c
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Pac
This isn't specific to netlink. I removed the two rules from the seccomp
filter and simplified it to just generally block socket(). I also
simplified adding the arches so that only the non-native arch is added,
not the native one. Note that adding the socket() filter *does* work on
both arches if t
Notified systemd upstream in
https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/2177 .
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1526358
Title:
adding seccomp rule for socket() fails on i386
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Invalid
** Changed in: libseccomp (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged => In Progress
** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which i
Thanks for cleaning up! Uploaded. This will trigger the testing of all
DKMS modules, so it'll get an adequate beating by britney.
** Summary changed:
- [FFE]: dkms: add module build ordering for ZFS on Linux
+ dkms: add module build ordering for ZFS on Linux
** Changed in: dkms (Ubuntu)
S
I. e. is the problem that the backlight doesn't come back on when you
raise the brightness again or so?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1381625
Title:
Adjust brightness to
see my comments on https://code.launchpad.net/~kaihengfeng/unity-
settings-daemon/add-brightness-limit-mechanism/+merge/277416 , high-
level userspace isn't the place for changing this.
Can you please elaborate on what the actual bug is here? I. e. what's
wrong with turning off the backlight on th
So if you run into that situation, discovering that this is configurable
and changing the configuration seems equally hard (or harder). I can
understand the heuristics what was done upstream in gnome-settings-
daemon (see linked bug) to generally clam the brightness to >= 1 if
there are many steps.
PENDS directive.
Note: The upload will trigger the testing of all DKMS modules, so it'll get
an adequate beating by britney (according to Martin Pitt).
[REGRESSION POTENTIAL]
DKMS package builds will fail.
---
Feature Freeze Exception Request:
build ordering to bu
zfs order because it uses
the new BUILD_DEPENDS directive.
Note: The upload will trigger the testing of all DKMS modules, so it'll get
an adequate beating by britney (according to Martin Pitt).
[REGRESSION POTENTIAL]
DKMS package builds will fail.
---
Feature F
** Changed in: unity-settings-daemon (Ubuntu)
Status: Won't Fix => In Progress
** Also affects: linux (Ubuntu Trusty)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: unity-settings-daemon (Ubuntu Trusty)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** No longer affects: linux
Nothing to do with util-linux. Ctrl+Alt+F1 is handled directly by the
kernel AFAIK. Does "sudo chvt 2" work for you?
** Package changed: util-linux (Ubuntu) => linux (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu
** Information type changed from Private to Public Security
** Changed in: dkms (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Triaged
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to dkms in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1303275
Title:
dkms_
** Changed in: dkms (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged => Fix Committed
** Changed in: dkms (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Martin Pitt (pitti)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to dkms in Ubuntu.
** Also affects: linux (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2049689
Title:
linux-image-5.15.0-94-generic breaks partprobe o
** Also affects: linux (Ubuntu Jammy)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: linux-signed (Ubuntu Jammy)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.
ht
** Tags added: jammy regression-release
** Tags removed: regression-release
** Tags added: regression-update
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux-signed in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2049689
Title:
linux-i
** Changed in: fatrace (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1861053
Title:
no fatrace output in focal
Status in fatrace package in Ub
Yes, of course. Heck, this is over 10 years old. Any bug which is still
left by now probably counts as "API" now 😅
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux in
501 - 536 of 536 matches
Mail list logo
