[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1409425] Re: lxc-start-ephemeral stops working with kernel 3.18 - overlayfs change?

2015-01-12 Thread Martin Pitt
It seems Serge knows what's going on, so tentatively closing the linux task. ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bug

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1409425] Re: lxc-start-ephemeral stops working with kernel 3.18 - overlayfs change?

2015-01-12 Thread Martin Pitt
hallyn | stgraber: i was thinking lcx-start-ephemeral used the api more than it does. hallyn | stgraber: lcx-start-ephemeral needs to be updated the same way the api did, for the new overlayfs options -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is su

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1350947] Re: apparmor: no working rule to allow making a mount private

2015-01-15 Thread Martin Pitt
** No longer affects: linux (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1350947 Title: apparmor: no working rule to allow making a mount private Status in AppArmor Linux app

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1233466] Re: Hot-Add Memory failing for lack of udev rule

2015-01-22 Thread Martin Pitt
Reopening the kernel task here. We've carried the "temporary" udev rule workaround for three releases now; it seems we all agree that it's wrong (unconditional "unbreak my kernel rule") and makes things even worse under memory pressure. Is there any better solution in sight? Thanks! ** Changed in:

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1414930] Re: Buttons of Synaptics trackpad doesn't work

2015-02-01 Thread Martin Pitt
systemd 219 is planned in about two weeks which will contain this. ** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Medium ** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Committed ** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Martin Pitt (pitti)

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1574727] Re: [SRU] Enforce using signed kernels and modules on UEFI

2016-06-28 Thread Martin Pitt
Hello Mathieu, or anyone else affected, Accepted grub2 into trusty-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/2.02~beta2-9ubuntu1.10 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See http

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1574727] Please test proposed package

2016-06-28 Thread Martin Pitt
Hello Mathieu, or anyone else affected, Accepted grub2-signed into trusty-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2-signed/1.34.12 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See https

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1574727] Re: [SRU] Enforce using signed kernels and modules on UEFI

2016-06-30 Thread Martin Pitt
Hello Mathieu, or anyone else affected, Accepted shim-signed into xenial-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/shim- signed/1.16~16.04.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See h

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1587686] Re: ZFS: Running ztest repeatedly for long periods of time eventually results in "zdb: can't open 'ztest': No such file or directory"

2016-07-01 Thread Martin Pitt
Colin, please fix this in yakkety so that the SRU can be released. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to zfs-linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1587686 Title: ZFS: Running ztest repeatedly for long periods of tim

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1581594] Re: constantly shows wrong temperature (99°C )

2016-07-01 Thread Martin Pitt
** Changed in: libatasmart (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to libatasmart in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1581594 Title: constantly shows wrong temperature (99°C

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1594871] Update Released

2016-07-04 Thread Martin Pitt
The verification of the Stable Release Update for zfs-linux has completed successfully and the package has now been released to -updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In the event that you encounter

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1587686] Update Released

2016-07-04 Thread Martin Pitt
The verification of the Stable Release Update for zfs-linux has completed successfully and the package has now been released to -updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In the event that you encounter

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1436940] Update Released

2016-07-04 Thread Martin Pitt
The verification of the Stable Release Update for linux-firmware has completed successfully and the package has now been released to -updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In the event that you enco

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1531768] Re: [arm64] lockups some time after booting

2016-07-08 Thread Martin Pitt
Thanks Colin, great work! I'll deploy this ASAP. FYI, at least some of the VM hosts in scalingstack got updated to a 4.4 kernel. Not sure how much that changes your investigations. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1531768] Re: [arm64] lockups some time after booting

2016-07-11 Thread Martin Pitt
lxd-armhf1 (on swirlix01) has run without any lockup since the host kernel update to 4.4. I created a new lxd-armhf2 yesterday (on swirlix08) which also survived without any workaround. At the same time I created a new lxd-armhf3 (on swirlix16) which has locked up pretty well every < 15 minutes (I

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1531768] Re: [arm64] lockups some time after booting

2016-07-11 Thread Martin Pitt
[hloeung@ragnar tmp]$ for i in {01..09} 16; do ssh swirlix${i}.bos01.scalingstack "uname -a"; done Linux swirlix01 4.4.0-30-generic #49~14.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Thu Jun 30 22:20:09 UTC 2016 aarch64 aarch64 aarch64 GNU/Linux Linux swirlix02 4.4.0-30-generic #49~14.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Thu Jun 30 22:20:09 UTC

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1531768] Re: [arm64] lockups some time after booting

2016-07-11 Thread Martin Pitt
hloeung | pitti: yeah, I believe work was done to get swirlix01-09 to 4.4 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1531768 Title: [arm64] lockups some time after booting Status in

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1531768] Re: [arm64] lockups some time after booting

2016-07-12 Thread Martin Pitt
> can you try using the following kernel parameters on the VM and see if this > helps: > rcu_nocb_poll rcutree.kthread_prio=90 rcuperf.verbose=1 the instance on swirlix16 (on 4.2 kernel) hung again (twice), with the attached console log. This now has the above kernel parameters, but I'm afraid it

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1589997] Re: The device on /dev/sdx is not created when inserting new devices

2016-06-07 Thread Martin Pitt
** Package changed: udev (Ubuntu) => linux (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1589997 Title: The device on /dev/sdx is not created when inserting new devices Status

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1233466] Re: Hot-Add Memory failing for lack of udev rule

2016-06-08 Thread Martin Pitt
Maintaining an ever-growing list of vendors is error-prone and TBH quite silly. Are there any CPUs where we *don't* want hot-add? If not, why can't the kernel just default to enabling this, instead of userspace unconditionally turning this on? But if hot-add is supposed to work everywhere, then for

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1584124] Re: revisit /etc/init.d/ondemand

2016-06-08 Thread Martin Pitt
Thanks Colin! So this confirms that we really should let the kernel be in "performance" during boot. But from https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1579278/comments/9 it actually sounds like we should leave it to "performance" all the time at least for processors which are ≤ 5 years

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1579278] Re: Consider changing default CPU frequency scaling governor back to "performance" (Ubuntu Server)

2016-06-08 Thread Martin Pitt
So it seems we should make the "ondemand" init script a no-op if /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/scaling_driver contains "intel_pstate", since in this case "ondemand" is worse than "performance"? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subs

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1584124] Re: revisit /etc/init.d/ondemand

2016-06-08 Thread Martin Pitt
So it seems we should make the "ondemand" init script a no-op if /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/scaling_driver contains "intel_pstate", since in this case "ondemand" is worse than "performance"? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subs

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1584124] Re: revisit /etc/init.d/ondemand

2016-06-08 Thread Martin Pitt
** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Martin Pitt (pitti) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1584124 Title: revisit /etc/init.d/ondemand Status

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1584124] Re: revisit /etc/init.d/ondemand

2016-06-08 Thread Martin Pitt
Closing the kernel task, as it's now obvious that we want to keep the "performance" default there, and only do the "ondemand" thing for older processors. ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Invalid ** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => In Progress -- Yo

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1579278] Re: Consider changing default CPU frequency scaling governor back to "performance" (Ubuntu Server)

2016-06-08 Thread Martin Pitt
ew => In Progress ** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu Xenial) Assignee: (unassigned) => Martin Pitt (pitti) ** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Medium ** Changed in: sysvinit (Ubuntu Xenial) Importance: Undecided => Medium ** Summary changed: - Consid

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1584124] Re: revisit /etc/init.d/ondemand

2016-06-08 Thread Martin Pitt
@dino99: That's fine, the script has AVAILABLE="/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu$FIRSTCPU/cpufreq/scaling_available_governors" [ -f $AVAILABLE ] || exit 0 thus it's a no-op for those cases. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linu

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1579278] Re: Keep powersave CPU frequency scaling governor for CPUs that support intel_pstate

2016-06-08 Thread Martin Pitt
http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg- systemd/systemd.git/commit/?id=2558ca88 ** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpa

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1584124] Re: revisit /etc/init.d/ondemand

2016-06-08 Thread Martin Pitt
http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg- systemd/systemd.git/commit/?id=2558ca88 ** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpa

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1233466] Re: Hot-Add Memory failing for lack of udev rule

2016-06-10 Thread Martin Pitt
> I would be happy to unconditionally turning hot-add on and SRU the udev rule back to Ubuntu 14.04. As I (and Kay) said, this is okay for an SRU, but unconditionally second-guessing/changing the kernel defaults is just wrong and inefficient too. For yakkety and onwards this *really* should be fix

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1591189] [NEW] missing python-yaml autopkgtest dependency

2016-06-10 Thread Martin Pitt
Public bug reported: linux' tests have recently started to fail differently in y than they were failing before: https://objectstorage.prodstack4-5.canonical.com/v1/AUTH_77e2ada1e7a84929a74ba3b87153c0ac /autopkgtest-yakkety/yakkety/ppc64el/l/linux/20160610_110617%40/log.gz Cloning into 'autotest-

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1531768] Re: [arm64] locks up some time after booting

2016-06-13 Thread Martin Pitt
This happens without any --user-data or any particular interaction, just by plainly booting a standard image. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1531768 Title: [arm64] locks

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1531768] Re: [arm64] locks up some time after booting

2016-06-13 Thread Martin Pitt
Neither did this trigger on two trusty 4-cpu instances so far. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1531768 Title: [arm64] locks up some time after booting Status in Auto Pack

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1531768] Re: [arm64] locks up some time after booting

2016-06-13 Thread Martin Pitt
Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: auto-package-testing Status: New => Triaged ** Changed in: auto-package-testing Importance: Undecided => Medium ** Changed in: auto-package-testing Assignee: (unassigned) => Martin Pitt (pitti) -- You received this bug notif

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1531768] Re: [arm64] locks up some time after booting

2016-06-13 Thread Martin Pitt
ing Assignee: Martin Pitt (pitti) => (unassigned) ** Summary changed: - [arm64] locks up some time after booting + [arm64] locks up some time after booting when idle if tickless (nohz=on) is used ** Summary changed: - [arm64] locks up some time after booting when idle if tickless (nohz=

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1531768] Re: [arm64] lockups when idle if tickless (nohz=on) is used

2016-06-14 Thread Martin Pitt
Oh noes! I'm still getting "task * blocked for more than 120 seconds" hangs even with nohz=off :-( Is there another option which I could try? ** Changed in: auto-package-testing Status: Fix Released => Triaged -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packag

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1592585] Re: radeon.ko not loads automatically after updates

2016-06-14 Thread Martin Pitt
** Package changed: systemd (Ubuntu) => linux (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1592585 Title: radeon.ko not loads automatically after updates Status in linux pack

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1531768] Re: [arm64] lockups when idle if tickless (nohz=on) is used

2016-06-15 Thread Martin Pitt
> It may be worth trying nohz=off on the host as well Junien did that on the nova compute host, and no change. Processes in the instance still freeze. This is actually also consistent with the observation that this apparently does not happen with the trusty kernel. -- You received this bug noti

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1531768] Re: [arm64] lockups when idle if tickless (nohz=on) is used

2016-06-16 Thread Martin Pitt
Hang still occurs with xenial kernel and one instance of nice -n 19 dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/null bs=1024 & I have now rebooted and started four dd's, so that all four CPUs should remain busy constantly. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1531768] Re: [arm64] lockups when idle if tickless (nohz=on) is used

2016-06-16 Thread Martin Pitt
FTR, running the trusty kernel on xenial userspace does not work: http://paste.ubuntu.com/17392362/ cking | pitti, syscall 384 on aarch64 is getrandom() and that does not exist on trusty -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to lin

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1593291] Re: USB 2 vs. 3 device mapping is inconsistent

2016-06-16 Thread Martin Pitt
** Package changed: udev (Ubuntu) => linux (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1593291 Title: USB 2 vs. 3 device mapping is inconsistent Status in linux package in U

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1531768] Re: [arm64] lockups when idle if tickless (nohz=on) is used

2016-06-16 Thread Martin Pitt
Further notekeeping: - 4 dd's (xenial+nohz=off) has survived for half a day, then the instance crashed on something else. - trusty and vivid kernels with nohz=off have survived for a full day without any lockups. lxd on trusty kernel causes a lot of leaked "FREEZED/FREEZING" containers, but th

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1574727] Re: [SRU] Enforce using signed kernels and modules on UEFI

2016-06-17 Thread Martin Pitt
Hello Mathieu, or anyone else affected, Accepted grub2 into xenial-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/2.02~beta2-36ubuntu3.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See http

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1574727] Please test proposed package

2016-06-17 Thread Martin Pitt
Hello Mathieu, or anyone else affected, Accepted grub2-signed into xenial-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2-signed/1.66.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See https:

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1574727] Please test proposed package

2016-06-17 Thread Martin Pitt
Hello Mathieu, or anyone else affected, Accepted dkms into xenial-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dkms/2.2.0.3-2ubuntu11.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See https://w

Re: [Kernel-packages] [Bug 1531768] Re: [arm64] lockups when idle if tickless (nohz=on) is used

2016-06-17 Thread Martin Pitt
Colin Ian King [2016-06-17 10:50 -]: > I'm trying to get a reliable reproducer on a similarly sized aarch64 > host. Just so that I'm not missing anything, what is the entire command > line being used on the host to run the VM? I can't determine this. I asked Junien on IRC to put it here. > A

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1531768] Re: [arm64] lockups when idle if tickless (nohz=on) is used

2016-06-17 Thread Martin Pitt
>- trusty and vivid kernels with nohz=off have survived for a full day without any lockups. They both hung last night. So in summary: Neither nohz=off nor older kernels help here. This really seems to be a matter of luck/what's going on on the host system. ** Summary changed: - [arm64] lockups

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1588946] Update Released

2016-06-20 Thread Martin Pitt
The verification of the Stable Release Update for initramfs-tools has completed successfully and the package has now been released to -updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In the event that you enc

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1574727] Re: [SRU] Enforce using signed kernels and modules on UEFI

2016-06-21 Thread Martin Pitt
Meh, I meant to release grub2{,-signed} for trusty, fat-fingered this. I removed the copy into -updates, as this is premature. ** Changed in: grub2 (Ubuntu Xenial) Status: Fix Released => Fix Committed ** Changed in: grub2-signed (Ubuntu Xenial) Status: Fix Released => Fix Committed

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1436940] Please test proposed package

2016-06-24 Thread Martin Pitt
Hello Brian, or anyone else affected, Accepted linux-firmware into xenial-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux- firmware/1.157.2 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See ht

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1574727] Re: [SRU] Enforce using signed kernels and modules on UEFI

2016-06-24 Thread Martin Pitt
Hello Mathieu, or anyone else affected, Accepted shim-signed into trusty-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/shim- signed/1.15~14.04.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See h

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1574727] Please test proposed package

2016-06-24 Thread Martin Pitt
Hello Mathieu, or anyone else affected, Accepted shim-signed into precise-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/shim- signed/1.15~12.04.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1574727] Please test proposed package

2016-06-24 Thread Martin Pitt
Hello Mathieu, or anyone else affected, Accepted dkms into trusty-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dkms/2.2.0.3-1.1ubuntu5.14.04.6 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See ht

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1574727] Please test proposed package

2016-06-24 Thread Martin Pitt
Hello Mathieu, or anyone else affected, Accepted grub2-signed into trusty-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2-signed/1.34.10 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See https

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1574727] Please test proposed package

2016-06-24 Thread Martin Pitt
Hello Mathieu, or anyone else affected, Accepted grub2 into trusty-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/2.02~beta2-9ubuntu1.9 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See https

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1603578] Re: unable to enumerate USB device

2016-07-17 Thread Martin Pitt
** Package changed: udisks2 (Ubuntu) => linux (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1603578 Title: unable to enumerate USB device Status in linux package in Ubuntu:

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1603715] Re: bluetooth unavailable after rfkill hard (or soft) unblocking and after suspend/resume

2016-07-17 Thread Martin Pitt
** Package changed: systemd (Ubuntu) => bluez (Ubuntu) ** Project changed: systemd => bluez -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to bluez in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1603715 Title: bluetooth unavailable after rfk

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1586169] Update Released

2016-07-18 Thread Martin Pitt
The verification of the Stable Release Update for ubuntu-fan has completed successfully and the package has now been released to -updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In the event that you encounte

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1584692] Update Released

2016-07-18 Thread Martin Pitt
The verification of the Stable Release Update for ubuntu-fan has completed successfully and the package has now been released to -updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In the event that you encounte

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1586176] Update Released

2016-07-18 Thread Martin Pitt
The verification of the Stable Release Update for ubuntu-fan has completed successfully and the package has now been released to -updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In the event that you encounte

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1551747] Update Released

2016-07-18 Thread Martin Pitt
The verification of the Stable Release Update for ubuntu-fan has completed successfully and the package has now been released to -updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In the event that you encounte

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1535054] Update Released

2016-07-18 Thread Martin Pitt
The verification of the Stable Release Update for ubuntu-fan has completed successfully and the package has now been released to -updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In the event that you encounte

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1584092] Update Released

2016-07-18 Thread Martin Pitt
The verification of the Stable Release Update for ubuntu-fan has completed successfully and the package has now been released to -updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In the event that you encounte

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1584775] Update Released

2016-07-18 Thread Martin Pitt
The verification of the Stable Release Update for ubuntu-fan has completed successfully and the package has now been released to -updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In the event that you encounte

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1582956] Update Released

2016-07-18 Thread Martin Pitt
The verification of the Stable Release Update for ubuntu-fan has completed successfully and the package has now been released to -updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In the event that you encounte

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1584150] Update Released

2016-07-18 Thread Martin Pitt
The verification of the Stable Release Update for ubuntu-fan has completed successfully and the package has now been released to -updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In the event that you encounte

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1584878] Update Released

2016-07-18 Thread Martin Pitt
The verification of the Stable Release Update for ubuntu-fan has completed successfully and the package has now been released to -updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In the event that you encounte

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1528230] Re: [ADT test failure] linux: ubuntu_qrt_apparmor.test-apparmor.py -- ONEXEC - check current 'unconfined' != expected

2016-07-29 Thread Martin Pitt
Hello Andy, or anyone else affected, Accepted apparmor into xenial-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apparmor/2.10.95-0ubuntu2.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See https

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1607920] Re: zfs services fail on firstboot if zfs-utils is integrated into the deployment image

2016-07-31 Thread Martin Pitt
Confirmed. /etc/mtab is dead, dead, dead, and an ill-conceived and broken concept. Don't ever use it please ☺ -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to zfs-linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1607920 Title: zfs servic

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1600124] Re: Adjust KBL PCI-ID's

2016-09-06 Thread Martin Pitt
** Changed in: mesa (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1600124 Title: Adjust KBL PCI-ID's Status in libdrm package in Ubuntu: F

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1584456] Re: apparmor denial using ptmx char device

2016-09-06 Thread Martin Pitt
Hello Pedro, or anyone else affected, Accepted snap-confine into xenial-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/snap- confine/1.0.38-0ubuntu0.16.04.10 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new pac

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1623194] Re: Permanent I/O from kworker and ecryptfs

2016-09-13 Thread Martin Pitt
** Summary changed: - Permanent I/O from kworker since migrated to systemd + Permanent I/O from kworker and ecryptfs ** Package changed: systemd (Ubuntu) => linux (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1579278] Re: Keep powersave CPU frequency scaling governor for CPUs that support intel_pstate

2016-09-16 Thread Martin Pitt
> The preferred governor with the intel_pstate driver is powersave. Do you have some references/proof for that? This is contrary to what kernel developers say, see comment 1. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1579278] Re: Keep powersave CPU frequency scaling governor for CPUs that support intel_pstate

2016-09-19 Thread Martin Pitt
Thanks Doug! Ack, I'll change it to use "powersave" again then. ** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Released => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/15

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1579278] Re: Keep powersave CPU frequency scaling governor for CPUs that support intel_pstate

2016-09-19 Thread Martin Pitt
With https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg- systemd/systemd.git/commit/?id=94a70093 it uses powersave on intel_pstate again, like in xenial. > pitti, can we please have a config option to disable "ondemand"? Indeed, right now it is statically enabled, so it can only be disabled with "systemctl mask

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1579278] Re: Keep powersave CPU frequency scaling governor for CPUs that support intel_pstate

2016-09-19 Thread Martin Pitt
> I'll make it dynamically enabled https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg- systemd/systemd.git/commit/?id=19e67c70 ** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to l

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1625100] Re: systemd 231-6 ADT test failure with linux 4.8.0-11.12

2016-09-19 Thread Martin Pitt
** Also affects: linux (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1625100 Title: systemd 231-6 ADT test failure with linux 4.8.0-

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1625100] Re: systemd test failure with linux 4.8.0-11.12: scsi_debug missing in ppc64el, systemd-tmpfiles crash

2016-09-19 Thread Martin Pitt
** Summary changed: - systemd 231-6 ADT test failure with linux 4.8.0-11.12 + systemd test failure with linux 4.8.0-11.12: scsi_debug missing in ppc64el, systemd-tmpfiles crash -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubu

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1625100] Re: systemd test failure with linux 4.8.0-11.12: scsi_debug missing in ppc64el, systemd-tmpfiles crash

2016-09-19 Thread Martin Pitt
I tried to reproduce the full boot-and-services test log on scalingstack, and upon rebooting into the 4.8 kernel I got the attached kernel oops. This does everytime, though. ** Attachment added: "4.8/ppc64el kernel crash log" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/1625100/+atta

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1625100] Re: systemd test failure with linux 4.8.0-11.12: scsi_debug missing in ppc64el, systemd-tmpfiles crash

2016-09-19 Thread Martin Pitt
> [kernel oops] This does everytime, though. This was supposed to mean: This does *not happen* every time. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1625100 Title: systemd test fai

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1625100] Re: systemd test failure with linux 4.8.0-11.12: scsi_debug missing in ppc64el, systemd-tmpfiles crash

2016-09-19 Thread Martin Pitt
FTR, I ran the full boot-and-services test against the current PPA which has kernel -11.12 and could not reproduce the crash. Could it be that this was a regression in -10.11 (the test runs in the description) which got fixed in -11.12 again? So the only concrete thing here that I can see is the m

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1624844] Re: Ubuntu 16.04 breaks boot with wrong zpool.cache

2016-09-19 Thread Martin Pitt
** Package changed: systemd (Ubuntu) => zfs-linux (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to zfs-linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1624844 Title: Ubuntu 16.04 breaks boot with wrong zpool.cache Status in zf

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1625100] Re: systemd test failure with linux 4.8.0-11.12: scsi_debug missing in ppc64el, systemd-tmpfiles crash

2016-09-19 Thread Martin Pitt
** Tags added: bot-stop-nagging ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => New ** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1626394] [NEW] 4.8 update breaks systemd's TEST-08-ISSUE-2730 upstream test

2016-09-21 Thread Martin Pitt
(Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Confirmed ** Affects: systemd (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Assignee: Martin Pitt (pitti) Status: In Progress ** Tags: bot-stop-nagging ** Also affects: systemd (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Ch

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1626429] [NEW] [4.8 regression][ThinkPad X230] brightness change keys do not work any more

2016-09-22 Thread Martin Pitt
Public bug reported: With yakkety's recent update from linux 4.4 to 4.8 my brightness keys stopped working. They are not handled in software via evdev events (on most platforms you just get a KEY_BRIGHTNESS{UP ../../../:00:02.0 -r--r--r-- 1 root root 4096 Sep 22 09:45 max_brightness drwxr-xr-x

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1626436] [NEW] [4.8 regression] boot has become very slow

2016-09-22 Thread Martin Pitt
Public bug reported: With yakkety's recent update from linux 4.4 to 4.8 booting has become a lot slower. It's not one service in particular, but without "quiet" and "splash" you can now easily read every single line instead of that whole wall of text zipping by. It now takes over 20s instead of ~1

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1626436] Re: [4.8 regression] boot has become very slow

2016-09-22 Thread Martin Pitt
Confirmed with 4.8.0-14.15-generic from yakkety-proposed. Immediately after boot the system load is also reported as ~ 250, and then slowly goes down towards zero. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu. https://b

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1626436] Re: [4.8 regression] boot has become very slow

2016-09-22 Thread Martin Pitt
I do not see this in QEMU (even with -smp 4), only on my laptop. At this point I'm not sure if it is specific to my ThinkPad X230 or happens for others too. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.laun

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1626394] Re: 4.8/amd64 dropped CONFIG_ATA=y (breaks systemd's TEST-08-ISSUE-2730 upstream test)

2016-09-22 Thread Martin Pitt
This is the first test that boots the root disk without an initrd. Indeed booting it with debug shows that the kernel detects no hard disks then (in particular not /dev/sda1), thus the boot fails like that. With 4.4, or with 4.8 and booting with an initrd it detects the sda hard drive again: [

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1626394] Re: 4.8 dropped CONFIG_ATA=y (breaks systemd's TEST-08-ISSUE-2730 upstream test)

2016-09-22 Thread Martin Pitt
> This only happens on amd64, i386 and ppc64el are fine. FTR, this is because we run the qemu tests only on amd64. i386 also has CONFIG_ATA=m now. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1626394] Re: 4.8 dropped CONFIG_ATA=y (breaks systemd's TEST-08-ISSUE-2730 upstream test)

2016-09-22 Thread Martin Pitt
Talked to Andy on IRC, and dropping these drivers was not intended. I agree we should keep the most common ones built in, especially for cloud instances; there it would really be beneficial to drop initrds completely (see bug 1592684), as they are just bloat there. ** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu)

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1626158] Re: image won't boot after upgrading to yakkety's 4.8 kernel because efi

2016-09-22 Thread Martin Pitt
> CONFIG_FAT_DEFAULT_IOCHARSET somehow got changed to utf8 instead of iso8859-1. Related: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=833238 TL;DR: Use this: CONFIG_FAT_DEFAULT_IOCHARSET="ascii" FAT_DEFAULT_UTF8=y ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #833238 http://bugs.debian.org

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1608499] Update Released

2016-09-22 Thread Martin Pitt
The verification of the Stable Release Update for dkms has completed successfully and the package has now been released to -updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In the event that you encounter a reg

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1625100] Re: systemd test failure with linux 4.8.0-11.12: scsi_debug missing in ppc64el, systemd-tmpfiles crash

2016-09-22 Thread Martin Pitt
http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/s/systemd/yakkety/ppc64el passed a few times again, and that tmpfiles crash never reproduced. ** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Fix Released ** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Released => Invalid -- You received th

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1625100] Re: systemd test failure with linux 4.8.0-11.12: scsi_debug missing in ppc64el, systemd-tmpfiles crash

2016-09-22 Thread Martin Pitt
This was fixed in -14, scsi_debug is back. ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1625100 Title: systemd t

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1626651] Re: brightness keys are handled slower in Yakkety than Xenial

2016-09-22 Thread Martin Pitt
Oh, forgot: for evtest you might need to try with several devices, such as "ThinkPad Extra Buttons" and the actual keyboard. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1626651 Title:

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1626651] Re: brightness keys are handled slower in Yakkety than Xenial

2016-09-22 Thread Martin Pitt
This looks like one keypress would cause a massive spew of uevents and/or evdev events. Can you please run "sudo evtest" and "udevadm monitor -e", then press a brightness key once, then ^C both and copy&paste the output? I don't get this on my ThinkPad X230, I have the opposite problem (brightnes

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1626429] Re: [4.8 regression][ThinkPad X230] brightness change keys do not work any more

2016-09-22 Thread Martin Pitt
** Attachment added: "pitti's x230 acpidump" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1626429/+attachment/4746382/+files/acpidump-x230.log -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launch

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1626429] Re: [4.8 regression][ThinkPad X230] brightness change keys do not work any more

2016-09-22 Thread Martin Pitt
So this did break with -10 and -11, but was fixed again in -14. ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/162642

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1626651] Re: brightness keys are handled slower in Yakkety than Xenial

2016-09-22 Thread Martin Pitt
I just dist-upgraded again, and with 4.8.0-14 my brightness keys work again (bug 1626429). Under i3 (no unity-settings-daemon), I get a tame and immediate reaction: UDEV [38372.886325] change /devices/pci:00/:00:02.0/backlight/acpi_video0 (backlight) ACTION=change DEVPATH=/devices/pci0

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   >