[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1205639] [NEW] bcmwl-kernel-source 6.20.155.1+bdcom-0ubuntu6: bcmwl kernel module failed to build

2013-07-27 Thread Ewen
Public bug reported: DKMS make.log for bcmwl-6.20.155.1+bdcom for kernel 3.10.2-031002-generic (x86_64) samedi 27 juillet 2013, 15:16:56 (UTC+0200) make: entrant dans le répertoire « /usr/src/linux-headers-3.10.2-031002-generic » CFG80211 API is prefered for this kernel version Using CFG80211 AP

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1842447] Re: Kernel Panic with linux-image-4.15.0-60-generic when specifying nameserver in docker-compose

2019-09-08 Thread Ewen McNeill
versioned packages that didn't have that version in their package name (ie, to find the generic metapackages). Ewen PS: Reboots (due to kernel panic, and kernel.panic=15 sysctl) over the weekend: -=- cut here -=- ewen@naosr620:~$ last | grep reboot reboot system boot 4.15.0-62-generi Mon S

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1842447] Re: Kernel Panic with linux-image-4.15.0-60-generic when specifying nameserver in docker-compose

2019-09-08 Thread Ewen McNeill
FTR, I think this is the fix in -62: https://kernel.ubuntu.com/git/ubuntu/ubuntu-bionic.git/commit/?h=master- next&id=b502cfeffec81be8564189e5498fd3f252b27900 and it appears to be the only change from -60 to -62: -=- cut here -=- ewen@naosr620:~$ zcat /usr/share/doc/linux-headers-4.15.

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1843152] Re: Kernel Panic with linux kernel 4.15.0-60 possibly related to network subsystem

2019-09-08 Thread Ewen McNeill
62: https://kernel.ubuntu.com/git/ubuntu/ubuntu-bionic.git/commit/?h=master- next&id=b502cfeffec81be8564189e5498fd3f252b27900 Ewen -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1843152 T

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1842447] Re: Kernel Panic with linux-image-4.15.0-60-generic when specifying nameserver in docker-compose

2019-09-08 Thread Ewen McNeill
FTR, 4.15.0-62 seems *much* better than 4.15.0-60. With 4.15.0-60 this system was kernel panic restarting every 75-90 minutes; now it's been up since I installed 4.15.0-62, over 5 hours ago: -=- cut here -=- ewen@naosr620:~$ uname -r 4.15.0-62-generic ewen@naosr620:~$ uptime 16:09:54 up

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2018960] Re: linux-image-5.4.0-149-generic (regression): 0 at net/core/stream.c:212 sk_stream_kill_queues+0xcf/0xe0

2023-05-28 Thread Ewen McNeill
e process reported, although it seems the last one was a couple of hours ago, so I guess it's traffic dependent/timing dependent. ewen@naosr620:~$ uptime 16:27:32 up 5:19, 1 user, load average: 0.08, 0.14, 0.06 ewen@naosr620:~$ dmesg -t | grep WARNING | sed 's/CPU: [0-9]*/

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2018960] Re: linux-image-5.4.0-149-generic (regression): 0 at net/core/stream.c:212 sk_stream_kill_queues+0xcf/0xe0

2023-05-28 Thread Ewen McNeill
our. (I don't have time at present, due to my day job being excessively busy, to try to troubleshoot what Ubuntu changed between 5.4.0-148.165 and 5.4.0-149.166; but if the problem remains unfixed in a month when I'll hopefully have some more time I might try to review the diff between those two v

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2018960] Re: linux-image-5.4.0-149-generic (regression): 0 at net/core/stream.c:212 sk_stream_kill_queues+0xcf/0xe0

2023-06-01 Thread Ewen McNeill
to be a pointer actually isn't used/used as a pointer (presumably hence 0). Which makes me think "improperly back ported" (most likely by the Linux kernel "stable" process) is the most likely cause, and a state check got missed. Ewen -- You received this bug notification becau

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2018960] Re: linux-image-5.4.0-149-generic (regression): 0 at net/core/stream.c:212 sk_stream_kill_queues+0xcf/0xe0

2023-06-18 Thread Ewen McNeill
5f55c3a33512dbab613f7). Yet Ubuntu Linux released the buggy version in April 2023 :-/ Anyway I'm fairly confident that Ubuntu 5.4.0-152 should be okay. I'll update my server later this month, and if there are no more reports by about mid July 2023 I'll close this issue. Ewen ** Bug wat

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2018960] [NEW] linux-image-5.4.0-149-generic (focal-proposed): 0 at net/core/stream.c:212 sk_stream_kill_queues+0xcf/0xe0

2023-05-08 Thread Ewen McNeill
the process reported, although it seems the last one was a couple of hours ago, so I guess it's traffic dependent/timing dependent. ewen@naosr620:~$ uptime 16:27:32 up 5:19, 1 user, load average: 0.08, 0.14, 0.06 ewen@naosr620:~$ dmesg -t | grep WARNING | sed 's/CPU: [0-9]*/CPU: N/; s/PI

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2018960] Re: linux-image-5.4.0-149-generic (focal-proposed): 0 at net/core/stream.c:212 sk_stream_kill_queues+0xcf/0xe0

2023-05-09 Thread Ewen McNeill
above (WARNING: CPU: 10 PID: 0 at net/core/stream.c:212 sk_stream_kill_queues+0xcf/0xe0) have continued overnight, but coming in bursts -- some hours had no reports, and other hours had 5-10 reports. So definitely feels like a race condition of some sort. Ewen -- You received this bug notification be

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2018960] Re: linux-image-5.4.0-149-generic (regression): 0 at net/core/stream.c:212 sk_stream_kill_queues+0xcf/0xe0

2023-07-09 Thread Ewen McNeill
x Kernel Stable Team fixes being copied out to various kernel versions (and then pulled into Ubuntu's kernel updates). So I'm going to close the issue as "fixed released" for both linux-image and linux-image-kvm. I believe the fix was released about 1 month ago (mid June 2023).

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2018960] Re: linux-image-5.4.0-149-generic (regression): 0 at net/core/stream.c:212 sk_stream_kill_queues+0xcf/0xe0

2023-07-09 Thread Ewen McNeill
the process reported, although it seems the last one was a couple of hours ago, so I guess it's traffic dependent/timing dependent. ewen@naosr620:~$ uptime 16:27:32 up 5:19, 1 user, load average: 0.08, 0.14, 0.06 ewen@naosr620:~$ dmesg -t | grep WARNING | sed 's/CPU: [0-9

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2018960] Re: linux-image-5.4.0-149-generic (regression): 0 at net/core/stream.c:212 sk_stream_kill_queues+0xcf/0xe0

2023-07-09 Thread Ewen McNeill
the process reported, although it seems the last one was a couple of hours ago, so I guess it's traffic dependent/timing dependent. ewen@naosr620:~$ uptime 16:27:32 up 5:19, 1 user, load average: 0.08, 0.14, 0.06 ewen@naosr620:~$ dmesg -t | grep WARNING | sed 's/CPU: [0-9]*/CPU: N/