Understood. Thanks for investigating the possibility.
On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 10:43 AM, Colin Ian King
<1578...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote:
> @Jeff, the backport to the much older 2.x version of smbios is just too
> intrusive and risky for me to deem this worthwhile; this is more like
> adding a f
On 19/05/16 16:49, Jeff Lane wrote:
> Can this also be SRUd to Trusty?
>
Backporting it maybe non-trivial, I will have a look and see what is
required.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to dmidecode in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.lau
2 matches
Mail list logo
