** Package changed: libftdi (Ubuntu) => libftdi1 (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to libftdi in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1912371
Title:
[MIR] flashrom + libftdi
Status in flashrom package in Ubuntu:
yes, disabling lto explicitly for the build seems reasonable
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to libftdi in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1912371
Title:
[MIR] flashrom + libftdi
Status in flashrom package in Ubunt
This debdiff corrects the accidentally left in debug statement and adds
`optimize=-lto` to DEB_BUILD_MAINT_OPTIONS. Tests are succeeding again.
** Patch added: "lp1912371_v2.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/flashrom/+bug/1912371/+attachment/5498808/+files/lp1912371_v2.debdiff
Hi,
I thought we had deactivated the github bugtracker because flashrom
development does not happen at github.
The github mirror of flashrom is there purely for people who are
unwilling or unable (due to corporate restrictions etc.) to download the
source code from our self-hosted git trees. I'll
On Wed, 19 May 2021 06:52:55 -
Alex Murray <1912...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote:
> These failures of the mocked tests have been reported upstream at
> https://github.com/flashrom/flashrom/issues/186 by others but no
> response
Hi there,
I was the flashrom maintainer till a few years ago. While
These failures of the mocked tests have been reported upstream at
https://github.com/flashrom/flashrom/issues/186 by others but no
response - however I am pretty sure this is due to the use of LTO in
impish - cmocka is known to fail with LTO due to the use of --wrap which
doesn't play nicely with L
I am trying to do the security review of flashrom for this MIR but
currently it FTBFS with the attached debdiff in comment 9 - the build
log is attached. Can this please be resolved (along with removing the
'WILLIAM we're doing tests!' part of the output :)
** Attachment added: "flashrom_1.2-5ubun
I have reviewed flashrom along with fwupd and I don't see anything that
looks like it will cause problems. The flashrom documentation recommends
using vendors' flashing utilities when possible for laptops, and there
is a link to that page of the documentation in the manpage.
I have attached a debd
** Changed in: libftdi (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Matthieu Clemenceau (mclemenceau) => Ubuntu Security Team
(ubuntu-security)
** Changed in: libftdi (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to l
[Summary]
This package is safe to include in main.
This does need a security review, so I'll assign ubuntu-security
List of specific binary packages to be promoted to main:
* ftdi-eeprom
* libftdi1-2
* libftdi1-dev
* libftdi1-doc
* libftdipp1-3
* libftdipp1-dev
* python3-ftdi1
[Dupli
@paelzer, Sorry for dropping this, I saw the ping this morning on
ubuntu-meeting,
I'll put this in front of the team for review. I missed the notification.
Thanks for the reminder.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to libftdi
11 matches
Mail list logo
