--- Comment From danie...@br.ibm.com 2017-04-10 09:03 EDT---
> Hi,
> thank you a lot Daniel to identify the potentially missing two patches.
> I wonder thou if we really need all 7 then, or maybe just the two new ones.
> While the extra 5 are valid fixes in general I'm not sure they are 100
--- Comment From danie...@br.ibm.com 2017-04-04 14:08 EDT---
(In reply to comment #38)
> - do you think there are more than the 5 you identified?
> - Given the report that the 2.6.1 from yakkety works there must be something
> between 2.5 to 2.6.1 that we miss not from 2.7 as the identified
--- Comment From achen...@us.ibm.com 2017-03-28 20:05 EDT---
Hi all,
Just an update, we did get a similar machine set up, but so far I dont
have a recreate. I will see if I can find a copy of the same test case
and try that and see if I have better luck. Thx all!
--
You received this b
--- Comment From achen...@us.ibm.com 2017-03-17 13:59 EDT---
Hi all,
I am looking though patches to see if there might have been others. Is
there a way we can log into the machine to look around? We are looking
to see if we can find a similar machine to use as well. Thanks!
--
You rec
--- Comment From lagar...@br.ibm.com 2017-01-25 17:21 EDT---
Mike,
If you are running the modified QEMU in a host, you are correct.
You only need to patch the guest kernel if the QEMU in the host does not
contain the patches I pointed here.
I suggest the inclusion of both QEMU and kernel
5 matches
Mail list logo
