--- Comment From cdead...@us.ibm.com 2015-10-22 20:35 EDT---
State: Verify by: lieder on 22 October 2015 15:30:54
#=#=# 2015-10-22 15:30:42 (CDT) #=#=#
New Fix_Potential = [P810.00D]
#=#=#=#=#=#=#=#=#=#=#=#=#=#=#=#=#=#=#
--
You received this bug notification because you are a m
--- Comment From cdead...@us.ibm.com 2015-10-22 14:54 EDT---
State: Verify by: anitrap on 22 October 2015 09:38:53
Gavin added patched kernel to my system and EEH on bluefin worked. I'm
waiting for official fix before verifying.
--
You received this bug notification because yo
--- Comment From gws...@au1.ibm.com 2015-10-15 04:58 EDT---
Hi Canonical, those two patches are very critical for EEH functionality to work
properly. If it's possible, could you please include them in next release
cycle, which is 10/17 as I was told.
If there are any assistance needed, p
--- Comment From gws...@au1.ibm.com 2015-10-14 21:34 EDT---
Yes, all above 3 patches are required. Otherwise, error recovery can't work on
PE#0. Also, error injection to PE#0 just fail. For this particular bug, I think
it's just tracking the backporting for those 2 Linux patches from upst
--- Comment From cdead...@us.ibm.com 2015-10-14 21:15 EDT---
State: Verify by: trantow on 14 October 2015 16:08:58
Are Three patches required?
one for skiboot firmware (in OPAL) ... delivered in 5.1.5 -> op810 1539G ?
two Linux ones, and when available for 14.04.3 kernel 3.19 ?
--- Comment From cdead...@us.ibm.com 2015-10-14 17:35 EDT---
State: Verify by: trantow on 14 October 2015 12:26:47
Need to understand from Seq 19 & 20
commit 2aa5cf9 ("powerpc/eeh: Fix missed PE#0 on P7IOC")
commit 433185d2 ("powerpc/eeh: Fix PE#0 check in eeh_add_to_parent_p
--- Comment From gws...@au1.ibm.com 2015-10-12 13:36 EDT---
There is another related fix that needs backporting as well. So there're two
patches in total:
commit 2aa5cf9 ("powerpc/eeh: Fix missed PE#0 on P7IOC")
commit 433185d2 ("powerpc/eeh: Fix PE#0 check in eeh_add_to_parent_pe()")
On Fri, Oct 09, 2015 at 02:01:18PM -, bugproxy wrote:
> --- Comment From cdead...@us.ibm.com 2015-10-09 13:55 EDT---
> State: Verify by: anitrap on 09 October 2015 08:45:31
> Sorry about password confusion...So unless something has changed, I
> thought we were not supposed to
--- Comment From cdead...@us.ibm.com 2015-10-09 13:55 EDT---
State: Verify by: anitrap on 09 October 2015 08:45:31
Sorry about password confusion...So unless something has changed, I
thought we were not supposed to put lab passwords in defect.
You can request access to the passw
--- Comment From gws...@au1.ibm.com 2015-10-07 23:51 EDT---
*** Bug 128309 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1502982
Ti
--- Comment From cha...@us.ibm.com 2015-10-07 22:20 EDT---
Hello Tim,
This may have been asked before, but by the patch being committed to
Vivid, this also means it is automatically picked up for an upcoming
linux-lts-vivid kernel for Trusty (14.04), right?
--
You received this bug notif
11 matches
Mail list logo
