** CVE removed: http://www.cve.mitre.org/cgi-
bin/cvename.cgi?name=2013-2140
** CVE removed: http://www.cve.mitre.org/cgi-
bin/cvename.cgi?name=2013-2888
** CVE removed: http://www.cve.mitre.org/cgi-
bin/cvename.cgi?name=2013-2889
** CVE removed: http://www.cve.mitre.org/cgi-
bin/cvename.cgi?nam
This bug was fixed in the package linux - 3.2.0-57.87
---
linux (3.2.0-57.87) precise; urgency=low
[Steve Conklin]
* Release Tracking Bug
- LP: #1250622
[ Andy Whitcroft ]
* tools -- upgrade to common generic helper
- LP: #1205284
[ Kees Cook ]
* SAUCE: backpo
This bug was fixed in the package linux - 3.2.0-57.87
---
linux (3.2.0-57.87) precise; urgency=low
[Steve Conklin]
* Release Tracking Bug
- LP: #1250622
[ Andy Whitcroft ]
* tools -- upgrade to common generic helper
- LP: #1205284
[ Kees Cook ]
* SAUCE: backpo
flag@flag-desktop:~/seccomp/tests$ ./seccomp_bpf_tests
[==] Running 31 tests from 1 test cases.
[ RUN ] global.mode_strict_support
[ OK ] global.mode_strict_support
[ RUN ] global.mode_strict_cannot_call_prctl
[ OK ] global.mode_strict_cannot_call_prctl
[ RUN ] gl
My testing was with a Debian userspace. I don't have a functional Ubuntu
ARM environment. I can boot rebuilt kernels in KVM.
Can you just adjust the header file to get it compiled? I have no idea
why __NR_time is stripped out like that. It's a valid syscall.
--
You received this bug notification
as i said on irc, this code ATM doesn't compile:
flag@flag-desktop:~/seccomp/tests$ lsb_release -a
No LSB modules are available.
Distributor ID: Ubuntu
Description:Ubuntu 12.04.3 LTS
Release:12.04
Codename: precise
flag@flag-desktop:~/seccomp/tests$ uname -a
Linux flag-desktop 3.
This bug is awaiting verification that the kernel in -proposed solves
the problem. Please test the kernel and update this bug with the
results. If the problem is solved, change the tag 'verification-needed-
precise' to 'verification-done-precise'.
If verification is not done by 5 working days from
** Description changed:
While seccomp-bpf was backported into precise, it was only for x86. Now
that the ARM support is upstream too, it would be great to have the same
level of support on ARM in the LTS kernel.
I'll prepare patches.
+
+ [Impact]
+ ARM devices lack seccomp-bpf protecti
8 matches
Mail list logo