[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2019968] Re: Add missing feature bits in EPYC-Milan model

2025-02-09 Thread Markus Schade
Hi Christian and Lukas, For qemu, I can confirm that the patch works as expected: # qemu-system-x86_64 -cpu ? | grep Milan x86 EPYC-Milan(alias configured by machine type) x86 EPYC-Milan-v1 AMD EPYC-Milan Processor x86 EPYC-Milan-v2 AMD EPYC-Milan-v2 Processor Since t

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2019968] Re: Add missing feature bits in EPYC-Milan model

2025-02-07 Thread Markus Schade
Thank you for looking into this. If you are planning to do a SRU for this and the missing Genoa model , please consider the whole patch series: https://mail.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2023-05/msg01202.html Since you have applied the patch with the updated cache info, you can also cherry pi

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2025987] Re: 5.15.0-76: Qemu live migration causes VMs to crash but works with HWE kernel

2023-09-29 Thread Markus Schade
It looks like this bug is related to leaking of the PKRU bit. Applying the patch from Proxmox mentioned in https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/2036675 resolves the issue ** Summary changed: - 5.15.0-76: Qemu live migration causes VMs to crash but works with HWE kernel + 5.15.0-7

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1887490] Re: [FFe/SRU] Add/Backport EPYC-v3 and EPYC-Rome CPU model

2021-02-17 Thread Markus Schade
Hi Juul, these two flags are only present when SVM is enabled (which is unfortunately default in Ubuntu). We worked around this issue by modifying the target domain XML in live migration to disable both flags if they are not present on the source side (e.g. host running with older kernel). I am

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1896578] Re: raid10: Block discard is very slow, causing severe delays for mkfs and fstrim operations

2020-12-09 Thread Markus Schade
On focal (5.4.0-56-generic) we are starting to see massive file system corruptions on systems updated to this kernel version. These systems are using LVM with discards and thin provisioning on 6 or 8 NVMe drives in a RAID10 near configuration. We are currently downgrading all systems back to 5.4

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1904823] [NEW] device-mapper: btree spine: node_check failed: csum

2020-11-18 Thread Markus Schade
Public bug reported: While I have found previous reports of this check failing, they are all resolved years ago. So I guess this is something for upstream. device-mapper: btree spine: node_check failed: csum 544691913 != wanted 1983069109 [ cut here ] kernel BUG at drive

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1887490] Re: [FFe/SRU] Add/Backport EPYC-v3 and EPYC-Rome CPU model

2020-11-10 Thread Markus Schade
It seems one of the patches also introduced a regression: * lp-1887490-cpu_map-Add-missing-AMD-SVM-features.patch adds various SVM-related flags. Specifically npt and nrip-save are now expected to be present by default as shown in the updated testdata. This however breaks migration from instances

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1887490] Re: [FFe/SRU] Add/Backport EPYC-v3 and EPYC-Rome CPU model

2020-10-28 Thread Markus Schade
Same tests as above. Still working as intended ** Tags removed: patch verification-needed verification-needed-focal ** Tags added: verification-done verification-done-focal -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1887490] Re: [FFe/SRU] Add/Backport EPYC-v3 and EPYC-Rome CPU model

2020-10-21 Thread Markus Schade
Well, for me it's more or less a noop because we have been running a version with these patches for some time now. But nevertheless I haven't encountered any problems using your build/patch series. Host capabilities are correctly detected as EPYC-Rome and I can (still) start an instance with the EP

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1887490] Re: [FFe/SRU] Add/Backport EPYC-v3 and EPYC-Rome CPU model

2020-10-08 Thread Markus Schade
Note the fixup patch removing monitor flag: https://gitlab.com/libvirt/libvirt/-/commit/3bf6f9fe22dfbd3c1dcc614b31f2f4fe8b71a2f2 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1887490 Tit

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1887490] Re: Add/Backport EPYC-v3 and EPYC-Rome CPU model

2020-10-02 Thread Markus Schade
The new qemu version works as expected together with 5.4.0-49 kernel required for xsaves # grep -e 'model name' -e 'flags' /proc/cpuinfo model name : AMD EPYC-Rome Processor flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush mmx fxsr sse sse2 h

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1887490] Re: Add/Backport EPYC-v3 and EPYC-Rome CPU model

2020-09-29 Thread Markus Schade
Thanks. It does not look like the "regression" preventing proposed migration is caused by the qemu changes. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1887490 Title: Add/Backport EPY

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1887490] Re: Add/Backport EPYC-v3 and EPYC-Rome CPU model

2020-09-24 Thread Markus Schade
The second one is: https://bugs.launchpad.net/qemu/+bug/1849644 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1887490 Title: Add/Backport EPYC-v3 and EPYC-Rome CPU model Status in libv

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1887490] Re: Add/Backport EPYC-v3 and EPYC-Rome CPU model

2020-09-24 Thread Markus Schade
Actually no. It builds and does not have any downsides, but does not resolve the issue. Sorry for that. When I looked at the history of cpu_map and this patch, I did not see that it would require further patches to actually make it work. So that would leave it at these four patches: Add-pschange-m

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1887490] Re: Add/Backport EPYC-v3 and EPYC-Rome CPU model

2020-09-23 Thread Markus Schade
Thanks for the update. It looks like your libvirt build fails. Most likely due to the following patch missing: https://github.com/libvirt/libvirt/commit/58691208e2063285d981a620873d48ddf8df8be5 That patch adds the CooperLake test data (wrongly as CascadeLake- Server), which is later fixed in ht

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1887490] Re: Add/Backport EPYC-v3 and EPYC-Rome CPU model

2020-09-22 Thread Markus Schade
With the 5.4.0-49 from focal-proposed the xsaves flag can now be passed into instances. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1887490 Title: Add/Backport EPYC-v3 and EPYC-Rome C

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1887490] Re: Add/Backport EPYC-v3 and EPYC-Rome CPU model

2020-09-22 Thread Markus Schade
** Tags removed: verification-needed-focal ** Tags added: verification-done-focal -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1887490 Title: Add/Backport EPYC-v3 and EPYC-Rome CPU mod

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1887490] Re: Add/Backport EPYC-v3 and EPYC-Rome CPU model

2020-09-11 Thread Markus Schade
Is there anything I can do, regarding the backport of 52297436199d into focal kernel? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1887490 Title: Add/Backport EPYC-v3 and EPYC-Rome CPU

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1887490] Re: Add/Backport EPYC-v3 and EPYC-Rome CPU model

2020-08-02 Thread Markus Schade
Plain qemu with the EPYC-Rome model works without any problems. I already get xsave, xsaveopt, xsavec and xsaveerptr with the current focal kernel, which also means that gcc finally uses znver1 (for v3) and znver2 (for Rome) optimizations. Libvirt would require cherrypicking a number of commits to

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1777398] Re: dm thin block allocation failure

2020-04-08 Thread Markus Schade
fix was included in 4.4.0-177.207 (xenial), 4.15.0-92.93 (bionic), 5.3.0-46.38 (eoan), 5.4.0-15.18 (focal) ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubu

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1777398] Re: dm thin block allocation failure

2020-02-11 Thread Markus Schade
Patch has been backported to all stable kernel releases, e.g. 4.19: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/commit/?h=linux-4.19.y&id=1fac9f574cd2536abcdd645ee23d35c0e819d7ec -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subs

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1777398] Re: dm thin block allocation failure

2020-01-30 Thread Markus Schade
The patch is merged upstream and will be in 5.6. https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/device-mapper/linux-dm.git/commit/?h=dm-5.6&id=4feaef830de7ffdd8352e1fe14ad3bf13c9688f8 https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/drivers/md?id=e9f8ca0ae7b7bc9a032b42992

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1777398] Re: dm thin block allocation failure

2020-01-13 Thread Markus Schade
Patch posted at https://www.redhat.com/archives/dm-devel/2020-January/msg00021.html -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1777398 Title: dm thin block allocation failure Status

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1777398] Re: dm thin block allocation failure

2019-05-12 Thread Markus Schade
Unfortunately still present in mainline 5.0.13 kernel: [ cut here ] kernel BUG at drivers/md/persistent-data/dm-space-map-disk.c:178! invalid opcode: [#1] SMP PTI CPU: 5 PID: 1675751 Comm: kworker/u128:1 Not tainted 5.0.13-050013-generic #201905051330 Hardware name: Q

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1777398] Re: dm thin block allocation failure

2019-04-29 Thread Markus Schade
Still present in 4.15.0-47-generic even though a number of dm/thin fixes have been backported kernel: [1120717.622665] Modules linked in: cpuid xt_CHECKSUM xt_nat iptable_nat nf_nat_ipv4 dm_snapshot veth dummy bridge nf_conntrack_ipv6 nf_defrag_ipv6 ip6table_filter ip6_tables xt_CT iptable_raw i

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1777398] Re: dm thin block allocation failure

2019-04-29 Thread Markus Schade
Currently testing 5.0.10 as we think the issue is related to thin trying to reallocate a discarded block not working correctly https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/drivers/md?id=cffd425b90147296c627dfb13f7ea8f361d962b2 ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Sta

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1777398] Re: dm thin block allocation failure

2018-11-18 Thread Markus Schade
This issue is still present. Possibly fixed by upstream commit https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/drivers/md?id=a685557fbbc3122ed11e8ad3fa63a11ebc5de8c3 https://www.redhat.com/archives/dm-devel/2018-April/msg00022.html kernel: [8860597.921484] kernel BUG at

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1788563] Re: L1TF mitigation not effective in some CPU and RAM combinations

2018-09-14 Thread Markus Schade
proposed kernel for trusty still resolves this like test-kernel from #7 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1788563 Title: L1TF mitigation not effective in some CPU and RAM co

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1778475] Re: i40e: restore workaround for removing default MAC filter

2018-09-12 Thread Markus Schade
still unresolved in 4.19rc3 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1778475 Title: i40e: restore workaround for removing default MAC filter Status in linux package in Ubuntu: I

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1788563] Re: L1TF mitigation not effective in some CPU and RAM combinations

2018-09-11 Thread Markus Schade
kernel from #7 resolves this on trusty as well (according to sysfs) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1788563 Title: L1TF mitigation not effective in some CPU and RAM combin

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1789834] Re: off-by-one bug in L1TF mitigation

2018-09-05 Thread Markus Schade
This happens pretty much on all Ubuntu kernels with the initial L1TF implementation, so xenial, bionic and cosmic are also affected. https://cdn.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/ChangeLog-4.4.154 https://cdn.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/ChangeLog-4.18.6 -- You received this bug notification

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1789834] Re: off-by-one bug in L1TF mitigation

2018-08-30 Thread Markus Schade
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1789834 Title: off-by-one bug in L1TF mitigation Status in linux package in

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1789834] [NEW] off-by-one bug in L1TF mitigation

2018-08-30 Thread Markus Schade
Public bug reported: due to an off-by-one bug in the L1TF patch, the "rare" case of systems still vulnerable is more frequent. This typically happens on Nehalem+ destop/entry-level server systems with 32G memory installed. Originally this was reported in OpenSUSE, but I can confirm this is also

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1778486] Re: x86/kvm: fix LAPIC timer drift when guest uses periodic mode

2018-08-15 Thread Markus Schade
If I'm not mistaken, the fix has been released with the latest kernel update that was pushed for the L1TF issue. So this bug should be "fix released" -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.n

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1778486] Re: x86/kvm: fix LAPIC timer drift when guest uses periodic mode

2018-08-09 Thread Markus Schade
** Tags removed: verification-needed-bionic ** Tags added: verification-done-bionic -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1778486 Title: x86/kvm: fix LAPIC timer drift when gues

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1778486] Re: x86/kvm: fix LAPIC timer drift when guest uses periodic mode

2018-06-27 Thread Markus Schade
Thanks Joseph. I tested the kernel with OpenBSD and FreeBSD virtual machines and this patch seems to fix the timing issues. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1778486 Title:

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1778475] Re: i40e: restore workaround for removing default MAC filter

2018-06-27 Thread Markus Schade
Apparently not, but this was the only mentioning of this bug and the it can be reproduced just the same way (bonding + vlan) But after trying the mainline 4.18rc2 kernel, the bug is still present their. So it needs to be fixed upstream first (again). For reference: # uname -a Linux hostname 4.18

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1778486] [NEW] x86/kvm: fix LAPIC timer drift when guest uses periodic mode

2018-06-25 Thread Markus Schade
Public bug reported: OpenBSD guests encounter timing issues when running under bionic kernel. This issue is actually present since 4.10 and is fixed by: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10411125/ See also https://www.spinics.net/lists/kvm/msg161311.html ** Affects: linux (Ubuntu) Impor

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1778475] [NEW] i40e: restore workaround for removing default MAC filter

2018-06-25 Thread Markus Schade
Public bug reported: Ubuntu Bionic kernel (4.15.0-23) lacks upstream patch for i40e which results in forced promiscous mode when adding a vlan. [ 10.847381] i40e :3d:00.0: Error I40E_AQ_RC_EINVAL adding RX filters on PF, promiscuous mode forced on Steps to reproduce and patch here: http

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1777398] Re: dm thin block allocation failure

2018-06-20 Thread Markus Schade
Hi Joseph, sure, but running an rc- kernel is not ideal for production systems, so I can only give this limited exposure on a few canary systems. I hope we can find a way to deterministically trigger this, to confirm a fix. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kern

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1777398] Re: dm thin block allocation failure

2018-06-18 Thread Markus Schade
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1777398 Title: dm thin block allocation failure Status in linux packa

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1777398] Re: dm thin block allocation failure

2018-06-18 Thread Markus Schade
Also present in HWE kernel 4.15.0-23-generic #25~16.04.1-Ubuntu for xenial kernel: [450194.803852] [ cut here ] kernel: [450194.803855] kernel BUG at /build/linux-hwe-edge-ew4Cb4/linux-hwe-edge-4.15.0/drivers/md/persistent-data/dm-space-map-disk.c:178! kernel: [450194.803

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1777398] [NEW] dm thin block allocation failure

2018-06-18 Thread Markus Schade
Public bug reported: When using the bionic kernel (hwe-edge) on xenial we randomly trigger a kernel bug when creating or querying a thin provisioned lvm volume. kernel: [146487.421278] [ cut here ] kernel: [146487.421281] kernel BUG at /build/linux-hwe-edge-eBL7So/linux-

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1744244] Re: linux: 4.4.0-112.135 -proposed tracker

2018-01-22 Thread Markus Schade
fix confirmed spec-ctrl cpu flag is now visible inside kvm guest -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1744244 Title: linux: 4.4.0-112.135 -proposed tracker Status in Kernel SR

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1411350] Re: routing table does not show dynamic routes

2017-07-03 Thread Markus Schade
Since upgrading to 16.04 I have not seen this problem again. So I would consider this issue resolved. ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1568729] Re: divide error: 0000 [#1] SMP in task_numa_migrate - handle_mm_fault

2016-08-05 Thread Markus Schade
The -31 Kernel from Stefan's PPA with the patch has been running stable for 2 weeks and the previous version based on -29 for 3 weeks. So if that patch will make its way into Ubuntu kernel via the 4.4.16 stable series update, the bug can be closed from my side at that point -- You received this b

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1568729] Re: divide error: 0000 [#1] SMP in task_numa_migrate - handle_mm_fault

2016-07-27 Thread Markus Schade
But that is not the -31 from the PPA. Could you please try the kernel from the PPA that Stefan has posted? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1568729 Title: divide error: 000

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1568729] Re: divide error: 0000 [#1] SMP in task_numa_migrate - handle_mm_fault

2016-07-25 Thread Markus Schade
I have been running the -29 kernel from http://people.canonical.com/~smb/lp1568729/ for about two weeks now, so far without triggering the bug. With the kernel from Tim, the bug could still be triggered. So it seems there were different patches. I'll try the -33 kernel from ppa as well, to see if

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1568729] Re: divide error: 0000 [#1] SMP in task_numa_migrate - handle_mm_fault

2016-04-13 Thread Markus Schade
Unfortunately, the issue is still present. Apr 14 00:34:43 cnode17 kernel: [204922.475156] divide error: [#1] SMP Apr 14 00:34:43 cnode17 kernel: [204922.475185] Modules linked in: cpuid arc4 md4 nls_utf8 cifs vhost_net vhost macvtap macvlan nfnetlink_queue nfnetlink xt_CHECKSUM xt_nat ipt

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1568729] Re: divide error: 0000 [#1] SMP in task_numa_migrate - handle_mm_fault

2016-04-11 Thread Markus Schade
Thanks. Will test and report back in a few days. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1568729 Title: divide error: [#1] SMP in task_numa_migrate - handle_mm_fault Status

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1568729] Re: divide error: 0000 [#1] SMP in task_numa_migrate - handle_mm_fault

2016-04-11 Thread Markus Schade
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1568729 Title: divide error: [#1] SMP in task_numa_migrate - hand

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1568729] [NEW] divide error: 0000 [#1] SMP in task_numa_migrate - handle_mm_fault

2016-04-11 Thread Markus Schade
Public bug reported: While running qemu 2.5 on a trusty host running 4.4.0-15.31~14.04.1 the host system has crashed (load > 200) 3 times in the last 3 days. Always with this stack trace: Apr 9 19:01:09 cnode9.0 kernel: [197071.195577] divide error: [#1] SMP Apr 9 19:01:09 cnode9.0 kerne

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1411350] Re: routing table does not show dynamic routes

2016-02-02 Thread Markus Schade
I have encountered this behaviour on the wily lts kernel in 14.04 (4.2.0-23-generic #28~14.04.1-Ubuntu) However, i have manually added the route via ip route command, e.g. # ip r a 192.168.100.1/32 dev br-ext ip route show shows nothing, but ip route get displays the route. # ip route show | gr