ike we should probably add a patch in tcp_rto_delta_us() to
check that the skb is non-null b/f trying to read the timestamp.
Possibly something like this:
Author: Josh Hunt
Date: Tue Jul 30 19:45:43 2024 -0400
workaround empty rtx queue
diff --git a/include/net/tcp.h b/include/
mit queues. Additionally I
feel like we should probably add a patch in tcp_rto_delta_us() to
check that the skb is non-null b/f trying to read the timestamp.
Possibly something like this:
Author: Josh Hunt
Date: Tue Jul 30 19:45:43 2024 -0400
workaround empty rtx queue
ta_us() to
check that the skb is non-null b/f trying to read the timestamp.
Possibly something like this:
Author: Josh Hunt
Date: Tue Jul 30 19:45:43 2024 -0400
workaround empty rtx queue
diff --git a/include/net/tcp.h b/include/net/tcp.h
index 2aac11e7e1cc..d1e2ecbce536 100644
following may be more
appropriate:
Author: Josh Hunt
Date: Tue Jul 30 19:45:43 2024 -0400
tcp: check skb is non-NULL before using in tcp_rto_delta_us()
There have been multiple occassions where we have crashed in this path
because
packets_out suggested there were packets
her still packets in the write or retransmit queues. Additionally I
feel like we should probably add a patch in tcp_rto_delta_us() to
check that the skb is non-null b/f trying to read the timestamp.
Possibly something like this:
Author: Josh Hunt
Date: Tue Jul 30 19:45:43 2024 -0400
wo
her still packets in the write or retransmit queues. Additionally I
feel like we should probably add a patch in tcp_rto_delta_us() to
check that the skb is non-null b/f trying to read the timestamp.
Possibly something like this:
Author: Josh Hunt
Date: Tue Jul 30 19:45:43 2024 -
a_us() to check that
the skb is non-null b/f trying to read the timestamp. Possibly something
like this:
Author: Josh Hunt
Date: Tue Jul 30 19:45:43 2024 -0400
workaround empty rtx queue
diff --git a/include/net/tcp.h b/include/net/tcp.h
index 2aac11e7e1cc..d1e2ecbce536 100644
--- a/incl
7 matches
Mail list logo