[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1136700] Re: [Gigabyte H77M-D3H] cpufreq ondemand governor problem

2013-11-12 Thread James Hochschild
I downloaded the latest (as of last night 11/11/13) 32-bit Trusty desktop ISO and booted with the intel_pstate=disable option so that I could test the ondemand governor, and it does not have the bug, confirming Viresh Kumar's previous comment. The kernel version is 3.12.0-2. Thanks to all for res

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1136700] Re: cpufreq ondemand governor problem

2013-08-06 Thread James Hochschild
OK, I submitted the problem report as requested. I CC'd 1136...@bugs.launchpad.net, and I received this error: An error occurred while processing a mail you sent to Launchpad's email interface. Error message: The message you sent included commands to modify the bug report, but you didn't sign

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1136700] Re: cpufreq ondemand governor problem

2013-08-05 Thread James Hochschild
Until I upgraded my system last February I didn't have a system that was fast enough to trigger the bug. My previous system had a low enough CPU clock frequency that it didn't cause overflow in the frequency calculation, so the ondemand governor worked fine. When I upgraded the system, I already

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1136700] Re: cpufreq ondemand governor problem

2013-08-04 Thread James Hochschild
I tested the 32-bit version of the v3.11-rc3 kernel, and the ondemand governor still has the bug. This kernel uses the intel_pstate driver as the default and the ondemand governor isn't available in this case, so I booted with the intel_pstate=disable option to be able to test the ondemand governo