KDE PIM Split?

Hi Pim devels, I've received a slew of tickets which appears to be laying the ground work for splitting out all the PIM libraries into separate repositories. Before this happens can we: 1) Confirm this is the appropriate way to split it 2) Confirm the code is ready to build independently, and th

Re: KDE PIM Split?

On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 6:50 PM, laurent Montel wrote: > Le lundi 30 novembre 2015, 22:43:36 CET Ben Cooksley a écrit : >> Hi Pim devels, > > Hi, > So I reorganized source yesterday. > I verified that all was ok > So how I do now to split ? The splitting of the repositorie

Re: KDE PIM Split?

On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 9:46 PM, laurent Montel wrote: > Le mardi 1 décembre 2015, 21:10:57 CET Ben Cooksley a écrit : >> On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 6:50 PM, laurent Montel wrote: >> > Le lundi 30 novembre 2015, 22:43:36 CET Ben Cooksley a écrit : >> >> Hi Pim d

Re: Jenkins scripts broken?

On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 6:09 AM, David Faure wrote: > On Sunday 10 January 2016 14:32:01 no-re...@kde.org wrote: >> >> GENERAL INFO >> >> BUILD FAILURE >> Build URL: >> https://build.kde.org/job/kded%20master%20kf5-qt5/PLATFORM=Linux,compiler=gcc/40/ >> Project: PLATFORM=Linux,compiler=gcc >> Dat

Re: Reporting bugs to frameworks

On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 9:06 PM, David Faure wrote: > On Friday 15 January 2016 13:39:12 Christoph Feck wrote: >> On Friday 15 January 2016 12:55:47 Aleix Pol wrote: >> > Hi, >> > I've recently found a bug in kded. I've been trying to report it >> > but didn't manage to find it on the list [1]. >>

polkit-qt-1 does not build

Hi all, I've been hammering away at some of the builds on our Jenkins Sandbox, and have found it isn't possible to get polkit-qt-1 to build. This blocks the entire KDE 4 chain, among other things. Could someone please investigate? https://build-sandbox.kde.org/job/polkit-qt-1%20master%20latest-q

Re: polkit-qt-1 does not build

On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 11:13 PM, Martin Graesslin wrote: > On Friday, February 26, 2016 10:37:10 PM CET Ben Cooksley wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> I've been hammering away at some of the builds on our Jenkins Sandbox, >> and have found it isn't possible to get po

Re: Review Request 127251: [KUnitConversion] Fix downloading currency exchange rates

lease ensure you handle redirects properly and completely. Any software which fails to do so is considered unsupported even before it is released in regards to accessing KDE.org infrastructure. Workarounds will not be implemented on our systems in response to incorrect usage of QNAM. - Ben Cooksley

Re: Jenkins-kde-ci: kio master kf5-qt5 » Linux,gcc - Build # 259 - Still Unstable!

On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 7:42 AM, Christoph Cullmann wrote: > Hi, Hi Christoph, > > perhaps I am confused, but this looks strange to me. > > The TestSuite.kiocore-threadtest fails randomly (it worked in the previous > build with the patch inside) > and the favicons tests worked with my first try

Re: Jenkins and XDG_DATA_DIRS

On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 7:56 PM, Martin Graesslin wrote: > On Saturday, March 19, 2016 10:27:38 PM CET David Faure wrote: >> It appears that something regressed in the jenkins setup. >> >> Almost all of the current failures in the "Frameworks kf5-qt5" group come >> from XDG_DATA_DIRS not being set

Re: Jenkins and XDG_DATA_DIRS

On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 1:09 AM, David Faure wrote: > On Tuesday 22 March 2016 18:46:50 Ben Cooksley wrote: >> >> From what i've been told, the necessary changes to the scripts should >> now have been made to correct this. > > It's better, but not perfect y

Re: Jenkins and XDG_DATA_DIRS

On Sat, Apr 2, 2016 at 2:13 AM, David Faure wrote: > On Thursday 31 March 2016 22:16:57 Ben Cooksley wrote: >> The file >> /srv/jenkins/install/ubuntu/x86_64/g++/kf5-qt5/frameworks/kcoreaddons/inst/usr/share/mime/packages/kde5.xml >> exists > > OK. > >> I can

Re: Jenkins and XDG_DATA_DIRS

On Sun, Apr 3, 2016 at 2:49 AM, David Faure wrote: > On Saturday 02 April 2016 11:48:12 Ben Cooksley wrote: >> On Sat, Apr 2, 2016 at 2:13 AM, David Faure wrote: >> > On Thursday 31 March 2016 22:16:57 Ben Cooksley wrote: >> >> The file >> >> /srv

Re: Delaying KF 5.21

On Sun, Apr 3, 2016 at 9:09 PM, David Faure wrote: > I don't feel good releasing KF 5.21 with 14 failing builds in the CI. > Let's fix CI first, then we can release. Virtually all of those were networking faults on the part of the CI system - sorry about those. We'll need to come up with some way

[sysadmin/ci-master-config] docker/ubuntu-wily-slave: Setup environment for UTF-8 builds.

Git commit e11db4488e22e3338ab7ad48682020829823c065 by Ben Cooksley. Committed on 04/04/2016 at 07:11. Pushed by bcooksley into branch 'master'. Setup environment for UTF-8 builds. CCMAIL: cullm...@absint.com CCMAIL: kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org CCMAIL: sgcl...@kde.org M +2-0

Re: Encoding Issues?

On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 6:45 AM, Christoph Cullmann wrote: > Hi, > >> This is likely something I can fix, but I am heading off to my grandsons >> first birthday, will have to be later. >> Thanks for understanding. >> Scarlett > no problem at all. > > I fixed the tests to work again, its not the CI'

Re: MimeType issues on CI (Was: Re: Delaying KF 5.21)

On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 12:16 AM, Daniel Vrátil wrote: > On Sunday, April 3, 2016 12:58:24 PM CEST David Faure wrote: >> On Sunday 03 April 2016 12:43:27 Daniel Vrátil wrote: >> > Turns out when you include /usr/share in XDG_DATA_DIRS, all mime types >> > that >> > might have been provided by other

Re: MimeType issues on CI

On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 3:45 AM, Scarlett Clark wrote: > Right. For whatever reason several builds worked before it went boom... > reverted that commit. > Scarlett Hi, Based on my examination of the changes which were finally settled on, this should work properly now following a rebuild of all th

[sysadmin/repo-metadata] projects/frameworks/kwayland: Move KWayland to Frameworks.

Git commit 1b1ae307f2fa13e0a5e58228a9ca31758b649a82 by Ben Cooksley. Committed on 21/04/2016 at 07:39. Pushed by bcooksley into branch 'master'. Move KWayland to Frameworks. CCMAIL: kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org CCMAIL: mgraess...@kde.org R +0-0projects/frameworks/kwayland

[sysadmin/ci-builder-tools] build/qt5: Force qtwebkit to be dragged in for all Qt 5 builds, as we have things that hard require it to be available.

Git commit d923b21a4fc32954a6fb96061a96dad004b4f10e by Ben Cooksley. Committed on 22/04/2016 at 09:21. Pushed by bcooksley into branch 'master'. Force qtwebkit to be dragged in for all Qt 5 builds, as we have things that hard require it to be available. This option (much like many par

Re: kdewebkit?

On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 7:53 PM, Jan Kundrát wrote: > On Thursday, 21 April 2016 18:33:51 CEST, David Edmundson wrote: >> >> -postCheckoutCommand=./init-repository -f >> +postCheckoutCommand=./init-repository -f --module-subest=default,qtwebkit > > > That parameter is called --module-subset, not -

Re: Jenkins-kde-ci: kdbusaddons master kf5-qt5 » Linux, gcc - Build # 11 - Still Unstable!

On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 11:11 PM, David Faure wrote: > On Thursday 21 April 2016 14:57:52 no-re...@kde.org wrote: >> >> GENERAL INFO >> >> BUILD UNSTABLE >> Build URL: >> https://build.kde.org/job/kdbusaddons%20master%20kf5-qt5/PLATFORM=Linux,compiler=gcc/11/ > > Wow, ASAN detected a real bug in

Re: Jenkins-kde-ci: kdbusaddons master kf5-qt5 » Linux, gcc - Build # 11 - Still Unstable!

On Sat, Apr 23, 2016 at 1:04 PM, Daniel Vrátil wrote: > On Saturday, April 23, 2016 1:44:16 AM CEST Ben Cooksley wrote: >> On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 11:11 PM, David Faure wrote: >> > On Thursday 21 April 2016 14:57:52 no-re...@kde.org wrote: >> >> GENERAL I

Re: Jenkins-kde-ci: kdbusaddons master kf5-qt5 » Linux, gcc - Build # 11 - Still Unstable!

On Sat, Apr 23, 2016 at 8:35 PM, Martin Graesslin wrote: > On Saturday, April 23, 2016 1:09:00 PM CEST Ben Cooksley wrote: >> On Sat, Apr 23, 2016 at 1:04 PM, Daniel Vrátil wrote: >> > On Saturday, April 23, 2016 1:44:16 AM CEST Ben Cooksley wrote: >> >> On Fri, A

Re: Jenkins-kde-ci: kdbusaddons master kf5-qt5 » Linux, gcc - Build # 11 - Still Unstable!

On Sun, Apr 24, 2016 at 11:46 AM, Michael Pyne wrote: > On Sat, April 23, 2016 13:09:00 Ben Cooksley wrote: >> On Sat, Apr 23, 2016 at 1:04 PM, Daniel Vrátil wrote: >> > any chance to get this patch into our Qt build on the CI since it has been >> > integrated upst

Re: Jenkins-kde-ci: kdbusaddons master kf5-qt5 » Linux, gcc - Build # 11 - Still Unstable!

On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 10:36 AM, Albert Astals Cid wrote: > El dilluns, 25 d’abril de 2016, a les 9:05:58 CEST, Ben Cooksley va escriure: >> On Sun, Apr 24, 2016 at 11:46 AM, Michael Pyne wrote: >> > On Sat, April 23, 2016 13:09:00 Ben Cooksley wrote: >> >> O

Re: Jenkins-kde-ci: kdbusaddons master kf5-qt5 » Linux, gcc - Build # 11 - Still Unstable!

On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 5:59 PM, Martin Graesslin wrote: > On Saturday, April 23, 2016 8:48:17 PM CEST Ben Cooksley wrote: >> On Sat, Apr 23, 2016 at 8:35 PM, Martin Graesslin > wrote: >> > On Saturday, April 23, 2016 1:09:00 PM CEST Ben Cooksley wrote: >> >>

Re: Jenkins-kde-ci: kdbusaddons master kf5-qt5 » Linux, gcc - Build # 11 - Still Unstable!

d* thing, not a bad thing. I'll agree that it's a good thing. What's bad is that we have to deal with Qt, who as far as i'm concerned at least are not responsive enough to our complaints, and are far too slow. > > > Let's not move backwards. > > Cheers, >

[sysadmin/ci-master-config] /: Disable new_delete_type_mismatch ASAN checks, due to defective Qt code.

Git commit 8bdb20f0189da74e9875be45822e7f9aa872543e by Ben Cooksley. Committed on 26/04/2016 at 06:41. Pushed by bcooksley into branch 'master'. Disable new_delete_type_mismatch ASAN checks, due to defective Qt code. We've little choice but to disable this for the next few w

Re: Jenkins-kde-ci: kdbusaddons master kf5-qt5 » Linux, gcc - Build # 11 - Still Unstable!

On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 8:51 AM, Albert Astals Cid wrote: > El dilluns, 25 d’abril de 2016, a les 19:14:00 CEST, Ben Cooksley va escriure: >> On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 5:59 PM, Martin Graesslin > wrote: >> > On Saturday, April 23, 2016 8:48:17 PM CEST Ben Cooksley wrote: >&

Re: solving 'KSycoca database corruption!'

On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 10:01 AM, Jos van den Oever wrote: > Hi all, Hi Jos, > > A few days back dvratil reported errors in the KDE PIM unit tests. The tests > were writing > > QWARN : TestBlogger1::testNetwork() kf5.kservice.sycoca: ERROR: KSycoca > database corruption! > > On my laptop, I w

Re: Jenkins-kde-ci: frameworkintegration master kf5-qt5 » Linux,gcc - Build # 50 - Still Unstable!

On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 7:26 PM, wrote: > > GENERAL INFO > > BUILD UNSTABLE > Build URL: > https://build.kde.org/job/frameworkintegration%20master%20kf5-qt5/PLATFORM=Linux,compiler=gcc/50/ > Project: PLATFORM=Linux,compiler=gcc > Date of build: Wed, 04 May 2016 07:23:41 + > Build duration: 1

Re: Review Request 127756: Remove platformtheme plugin

s any objections in the next 24 hours. - Ben Cooksley On April 27, 2016, 11:16 a.m., Martin Gräßlin wrote: > > --- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://git.reviewboard

Re: Jenkins-kde-ci: kbookmarks master stable-kf5-qt5 » Linux, gcc - Build # 17 - Failure!

On Sat, May 7, 2016 at 9:02 PM, David Faure wrote: > On Saturday 07 May 2016 04:19:37 no-re...@kde.org wrote: >> >> GENERAL INFO >> >> BUILD FAILURE >> Build URL: >> https://build.kde.org/job/kbookmarks%20master%20stable-kf5-qt5/PLATFORM=Linux,compiler=gcc/17/ > > Something's quite unstable with

Re: Jenkins-kde-ci (many CI failures)

re communication with the Docker management daemons, and to permit easy+secure access to the Windows VMs. - Public network access is handled on the host (not the VPN server) using NAT. > > On Saturday 07 May 2016 23:51:43 Ben Cooksley wrote: >> >> We're exposing some flaws t

Re: Review Request 127747: Create a new script that generate the documentation for all projects following the syntax I proposed

> On April 28, 2016, 8:02 a.m., Olivier Churlaud wrote: > > Any other feedback? What should I do? > > Allen Winter wrote: > I suppose I need to find the time to test this out on the actual > api.kde.org machine. can I run it on the old KDE4 kdelibs KDE/4.14 branch? > > Olivier Churlaud wr

Re: dbus-less frameworks on osx

On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 6:39 PM, Kevin Funk wrote: > On Wednesday, May 11, 2016 7:38:58 AM CEST Martin Graesslin wrote: >> On Wednesday, May 11, 2016 4:00:45 AM CEST Nick Shaforostoff wrote: >> > hi all! I'm investigating possibility of getting some kde apps to build on >> > osx with vanilla Qt wi

Re: Jenkins-kde-ci (many CI failures)

On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 7:39 PM, David Faure wrote: > On Sunday 08 May 2016 23:06:02 Ben Cooksley wrote: >> On Sun, May 8, 2016 at 2:44 AM, David Faure wrote: >> > kdewebkit just failed with "Broken pipe" (the TCP error you mentionned) >> > (and kxmlrpcclie

Re: Review Request 127747: Create a new script that generate the documentation for all projects following the syntax I proposed

> On May 20, 2016, 1:50 a.m., Michael Pyne wrote: > > I've looked at the code itself and it seems reasonable, so from that > > perspective and given the length of time there's been no -1's, I think it's > > safe to commit. > > > > However you mentioned in the description that this isn't safe t

Continuous Integration

Hi folks, As you've probably observed, the CI system sent a large number of mails to this list over the past few hours. This was fallout from an extremely binary incompatible change affecting virtually all frameworks. I would suggest that maintainers please check the build logs for each of the f

Repository rename and consequences

- however custom scripts and procedures will need to be adjusted by hand. If anyone has any objections, please let us know. This change will be made in 48 hours. Thanks, Ben Cooksley KDE Sysadmin ___ Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list Kde-frameworks-devel

Re: Review Request 115613: Drop platform name from default user agent string

On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 10:21 PM, David Faure wrote: > On Monday 10 February 2014 09:15:23 Martin Gräßlin wrote: > > --- > > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > > https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115613/ > > --

Re: Repository rename and consequences

On Sat, Feb 8, 2014 at 10:58 AM, Ben Cooksley wrote: > Hello all, > > Sysadmin has received a request to rename the repository "kwallet" > (currently located at kde/kdeutils) to "kwalletmanager" in order to > free this name up. > > Once that has been com

Frameworkification of kactivities and plasma-framework

Hi all, Can someone please frameworkify KActivities? The CI system needs this due to a dependency loop. The new KRunner framework depends on, among others plasma-framework, which in turn depends on kactivities. Previously both these two escaped the need to be fully fledged frameworks, however as

Re: Review Request 115478: Add QFileDialog unit autotest for filters (which reveals a QPA bug)

> On Feb. 4, 2014, 5:17 p.m., Alex Merry wrote: > > Has the Qt patch been submitted upstream? > > Dominik Haumann wrote: > Meanwhile yes: https://codereview.qt-project.org/#change,77390 > > Alex Merry wrote: > I don't think it's useful to have tests that fail because of upstream > issu

Binary incompatible changes

Hi all, As there still seem to be remnants of the last BIC change to Frameworks around i've now commenced a force rebuild of all Frameworks on the CI system. Apologies in advance for any noise this creates - but it is necessary for this to be fixed to allow for other Frameworks dependent projects

Re: kprintutils - next steps

On Sat, Mar 1, 2014 at 7:32 AM, John Layt wrote: > On 28 February 2014 14:14, Alex Merry wrote: > >> Given the alpha1 time constraints, I just pushed this. >> >> I'll leave dealing with the old repo to you (which I guess involves >> filing a sysadmin request to remove it). >> >> David: kprintutil

Re: KActivities/master is now KF5/Qt5

On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 9:50 PM, Ivan Čukić wrote: > Hi all, > > Now that the 4.13 has been branched out, the master branch of KActivities is > for Qt5/KF5 development. > > I have updated the branch name in kf5-frameworks-build-include (I guess > David had something else in mind, so I'm CC-ing him

Re: Binary incompatible changes

On Sun, Mar 2, 2014 at 5:03 AM, Albert Astals Cid wrote: > El Dissabte, 1 de març de 2014, a les 16:53:28, David Faure va escriure: >> On Saturday 01 March 2014 16:39:56 Albert Astals Cid wrote: >> > Every time someone commits to okular, which may a bit too much, no? >> >> This is not what I sugg

Re: Binary incompatible changes

On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 9:30 PM, David Faure wrote: > On Tuesday 04 March 2014 12:08:07 Ben Cooksley wrote: >> On Sun, Mar 2, 2014 at 5:03 AM, Albert Astals Cid wrote: >> > El Dissabte, 1 de març de 2014, a les 16:53:28, David Faure va escriure: >> >> On Saturday

Re: kde4support => kdelibs4support[Was: Re: Releasing Deprecated modules and Tier 4 Definition]

On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 7:15 AM, Kevin Ottens wrote: > Hello, Hi, > > On Monday 17 March 2014 22:53:25 Mario Fux KDE ML wrote: >> Am Montag, 17. März 2014, 18.15:09 schrieb Kevin Ottens: >> > Porting Aids: >> > * kde4support (obvious); >> >> Just that it doesn't get forgotten I'd like to second

Re: [kdesrc-build] /: kf5: Port rc files to use branch-groups consistently.

On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 12:45 PM, David Faure wrote: > On Wednesday 05 March 2014 10:44:24 Kevin Ottens wrote: >> Hello, >> >> On Tuesday 04 March 2014 22:54:42 David Faure wrote: >> > On Tuesday 04 March 2014 01:32:14 Michael Pyne wrote: >> > It wasn't that transparent at all - a number of module

Problems found by the CI system

Hi all, It seems lately that people have been breaking builds and not fixing the results, and some builds are extremely unreliable. It would be appreciated if these could be fixed. Frameworks folks, when pushing binary incompatible changes, please ensure you push them to the frameworks in the cor

Re: Problems found by the CI system

On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 12:37 AM, Vishesh Handa wrote: > On Monday, March 24, 2014 06:59:24 PM Ben Cooksley wrote: >> >> Baloo developers, please take a look at the failure in this log - >> http://build.kde.org/view/FAILED/job/baloo_stable/80/console. When >> referencin

Re: build qt5 stable (changed subject from: qt5 stable: qengineio: fatal: remote error: access denied or repository not exported)

On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 5:38 AM, Gregor Mi wrote: > > > On 30/03/14 12:41, Aleix Pol wrote: >> On Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 12:02 PM, Gregor Mi >> mailto:codeminis...@publicstatic.de>> wrote: >> >> >> >> On 30/03/14 11:29, Gregor Mi wrote: >> > Hi, >> > >> > has anyone recently build qt

Re: build qt5 stable (changed subject from: qt5 stable: qengineio: fatal: remote error: access denied or repository not exported)

On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 9:34 AM, Dominik Haumann wrote: > On Monday 31 March 2014 17:27:33 Ben Cooksley wrote: >> On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 5:38 AM, Gregor Mi > wrote: >> > On 30/03/14 12:41, Aleix Pol wrote: >> >> On Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 12:02 PM, Grego

Re: Re: build qt5 stable (changed subject from: qt5 stable: qengineio: fatal: remote error: access denied or repository not exported)

On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 9:23 PM, Dominik Haumann wrote: > On Monday, March 31, 2014 23:24:09 Albert Astals Cid wrote: >> El Dilluns, 31 de març de 2014, a les 22:34:21, Dominik Haumann va escriure: >> > On Monday 31 March 2014 17:27:33 Ben Cooksley wrote: >> > > O

Re: Where to put kglobalacceld?

On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 9:12 PM, Àlex Fiestas wrote: > On Friday 04 April 2014 15:41:07 Martin Gräßlin wrote: >> Given that kglobalaccel is only intended for the kde-workspaces anyway my >> suggestion is to move it into plasma-workspace repository instead of merging >> with the framework. Please no

Re: kde4support => kdelibs4support[Was: Re: Releasing Deprecated modules and Tier 4 Definition]

On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 8:53 PM, Kevin Ottens wrote: > Hello, Hi all, > > On Thursday 03 April 2014 09:50:24 Jos Poortvliet wrote: >> On Wednesday 19 March 2014 10:41:15 Ben Cooksley wrote: >> > On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 7:15 AM, Kevin Ottens wrote: >> > >

Re: RFC: Do we want the entire commit history to be pushed if code is moved to another repository?

On Sat, Apr 26, 2014 at 7:20 PM, Frank Reininghaus wrote: > Hi everyone, > > when kdelibs was split into the different frameworks repositories, the > git history was dropped. I think that this was a good idea - splitting > the history properly would have been an extremely complex task, and > every

Re: KF5 Maintainers: Please get ready for release

On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 1:45 AM, Alex Merry wrote: > On 29/04/14 14:35, John Layt wrote: >> Using "rbt post" has the same result, but at least has more verbose >> error messages: >> >> One or more fields had errors (HTTP 400, API Error 105) >> path: error: unable to find 1db2612bdc625b7267

Re: Keeping CI green

On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 8:08 AM, Alex Merry wrote: > There are currently four frameworks that are yellow (for between 6 hours and 8 > days). kdelibs4support has had 3 commits (not counting those by scripty) since > it broke that have done nothing to fix the issue. > > If we claim that our release

Re: Issues for Qt5/KF5/KDE/CI system on OSX/MacPorts

On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 3:59 AM, wrote: > Hi Alex, > > On 24 May 2014, at 14:57 , Alex Merry wrote: >> Where *is* kconfig_compiler_kf5 installed? > > thanks again for pointing that out! > > I’ve found it here: > --- > $ find /opt/kde -name kconfig_compiler_kf5.app > $ find /Users/marko/WC/KDECI-

Re: Issues for Qt5/KF5/KDE/CI system on OSX/MacPorts

On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 7:32 PM, wrote: > Hi Ben, Hi Marko, > > On 26 May 2014, at 09:03 , Ben Cooksley wrote: >> This is because it was installed to /Applications/ within the >> installation jail (located at >> /Users/marko/WC/KDECI-builds/kconfig/local-in

Re: Issues for Qt5/KF5/KDE/CI system on OSX/MacPorts

On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 7:38 PM, wrote: > On 26 May 2014, at 09:35 , Ben Cooksley wrote: >> For reasons stated above, application packages cannot reside within >> /Applications. >> If they need to reside within a separate directory, we'll need to >> arrange this

Re: Issues for Qt5/KF5/KDE/CI system on OSX/MacPorts

On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 6:37 AM, wrote: > Hi Alex & Ben, Hi Marko, > > On 26 May 2014, at 11:04 , Alex Merry wrote: >> -DCMAKE_INSTALL_BUNDLEDIR=some/relative/path > > thanks to your hint I was able to insert a temporary workaround here on my CI > system > by supplying an additional configura

Re: Issues for Qt5/KF5/KDE/CI system on OSX/MacPorts

On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 9:04 PM, Alex Merry wrote: > On Monday 26 May 2014 19:41:33 Ben Cooksley wrote: >> On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 7:38 PM, wrote: >> > On 26 May 2014, at 09:35 , Ben Cooksley wrote: >> >> For reasons stated above, application packages cannot res

Re: Issues for Qt5/KF5/KDE/CI system on OSX/MacPorts

On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 5:53 PM, Marko Käning wrote: > On 27 May 2014, at 07:29 , Ben Cooksley wrote: > >> Please try the following syntax instead. >> Note that I recommend you override this in >> config/build/darwin-mavericks.cfg instead to ensure all CMake projects &g

Re: Issues for Qt5/KF5/KDE/CI system on OSX/MacPorts

On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 5:59 PM, Marko Käning wrote: > On 27 May 2014, at 07:29 , Ben Cooksley wrote: >> configurePlatformArgs=-DCMAKE_INSTALL_BUNDLEDIR="{installPrefix}/Applications” > > I ran into stg I had seen with my own trials to access the installPrefix

Re: Issues for Qt5/KF5/KDE/CI system on OSX/MacPorts

On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 9:55 PM, Alex Merry wrote: > On Monday 26 May 2014 20:37:23 mk-li...@email.de wrote: >> I hope that Ben can give me a hint about how to make use of proper variable >> substitution in that cfg file, since the following unfortunately doesn’t >> work: >> --- >> #configureExtra

Re: Issues for Qt5/KF5/KDE/CI system on OSX/MacPorts

On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 9:59 PM, Alex Merry wrote: > On Tuesday 27 May 2014 17:30:56 Ben Cooksley wrote: >> On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 9:04 PM, Alex Merry wrote: >> > On Monday 26 May 2014 19:41:33 Ben Cooksley wrote: >> >> On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 7:38 PM, wrote: &g

Re: Issues for Qt5/KF5/KDE/CI system on OSX/MacPorts

On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 8:08 AM, Marko Käning wrote: > Hi Ben, > Hi Olivier, Hi Marko, > > On 28 May 2014, at 08:48 , Ben Cooksley wrote: >> Hmm. What about "Application Support" which kdoctools appears to use? > > as documented on [1] I have reconfigured th

Re: Issues for Qt5/KF5/KDE/CI system on OSX/MacPorts

Hi all, Going to respond to everything in one email. > to kdoctools’ search path on the KDE/CI system. > > Question is, how to achieve it? > Will we indeed have to patch its sources? Patching of the sources by the CI system is considered unacceptable for KDE projects. Particularly as these are p

Re: Issues for Qt5/KF5/KDE/CI system on OSX/MacPorts

On 31 May 2014 11:37, Marko Käning wrote: > So, I have figured that kdoctools has found docbook and docbook-xsl just fine > when installing it via MacPorts: > --- > -- Performing Test _OFFT_IS_64BIT - Success > -- Found LibXslt: /opt/local/lib/libxslt.dylib (found version "1.1.28") > -- Found LibX

Re: Issues for Qt5/KF5/KDE/CI system on OSX/MacPorts

On 3 June 2014 09:08, Marko Käning wrote: > Hi Ben, > > On 01 Jun 2014, at 23:05 , Ben Cooksley wrote: >> That is caused by the patch. It assumes you have kdoctools installed >> within the sources of kconfigwidgets. This won't work. > I see. > >> The solutio

Re: KCoreAddons does not install most of its headers on my system

On 19 June 2014 07:19, Kevin Ottens wrote: > On Monday 16 June 2014 20:55:10 Michael Pyne wrote: >> On Mon, June 16, 2014 13:14:47 Kevin Ottens wrote: >> > On Monday 16 June 2014 12:58:30 Àlex Fiestas wrote: >> > > I encountered this yesterday, for a quick workaround rollback to cmake >> > > 3.0 >

Re: KCoreAddons does not install most of its headers on my system

On 19 June 2014 08:50, Kevin Ottens wrote: > On Thursday 19 June 2014 08:21:30 Ben Cooksley wrote: >> On 19 June 2014 07:19, Kevin Ottens wrote: >> > On Monday 16 June 2014 20:55:10 Michael Pyne wrote: >> >> On Mon, June 16, 2014 13:14:47 Kevin Ottens wrote: >&g

Re: Frameworks Overview

On Sep 24, 2013 7:33 AM, "Alexander Neundorf" wrote: > > On Monday 23 September 2013, Sebastian Kügler wrote: > > Hey, > > > > On Monday, September 23, 2013 00:27:21 Cornelius Schumacher wrote: > > > On Thursday 19 September 2013 Sebastian Kügler wrote: > > > > http://community.kde.org/Frameworks/

Re: Frameworks Overview

On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 8:22 AM, Alexander Neundorf wrote: > On Tuesday 24 September 2013, Ben Cooksley wrote: >> On Sep 24, 2013 7:33 AM, "Alexander Neundorf" wrote: >> > On Monday 23 September 2013, Sebastian Kügler wrote: >> > > Hey, >> >

Re: Frameworks Overview

On Sat, Sep 28, 2013 at 8:35 AM, Alexander Neundorf wrote: > On Friday 27 September 2013, Ben Cooksley wrote: > ... >> Yep. At the moment there are no real contenders as such - which is why >> it has not yet been replaced. >> Phabricator is being monitored for progress on

Re: Switch build.kde.org to Qt stable branch

Hi all, I have now made the change - until a new Qt 5 build completes, all projects which depend on Qt 5 will fail to build from source however. Regards, Ben ___ Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman

Re: Qt 5.2, test failures and rebuilds

On Sat, Oct 5, 2013 at 2:12 AM, Aurélien Gâteau wrote: > Hi, Hi Aurélien, > > I spent a bit of time this morning investigating why the khtmlparttest was > failing on build.kde.org after its Qt copy was switched to 5.2 [1]. > > Error looked very strange: > > QMetaType::registerType: Binary compat

Projects adding dependencies without clear indication of requirements

Hi all, It seems that plasma-framework (a dependency of kde-workspace master) has now added a dependency on kactivities. However kactivities itself depends on nepomuk-core and soprano - and there is no frameworks / Qt 5 branch for either of those. How do we proceed here? I'd appreciate it if mor

Re: Projects adding dependencies without clear indication of requirements

On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 6:59 PM, Ivan Čukić wrote: > The dependency is kactivities/frameworks branch which does not depend on > nepomuk-core nor soprano. > > Deps for kactivities are: > > -- The following OPTIONAL packages have been found: > > * KDBusAddons > * KWindowSystem > * KCoreAddons >

Include path issues in CMake

Hi all, It seems after the recent activation of KActivities that the usual issue of include/ and include/KDE/ has once again reared it's head. Do we have a proper solution for this which can be broadly applied across all frameworks, no matter if they are included in kdelibs[frameworks] or other s

Re: build.kde.org and `ping`

On Sun, Nov 3, 2013 at 12:27 PM, David Faure wrote: > This error: > > http://build.kde.org/job/kdelibs_stable/886/testReport/(root)/TestSuite/kptyprocesstest/ > > is caused by this: > > jenkins@slave1:/srv/jenkins/workspace/kdelibs_master/build> ping -i 0.5 > localhost > ping: icmp open socket: O

Re: Use kde-runtime[frameworks]!

On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 3:45 AM, Sebastian Kügler wrote: > Hey all, > Hi Sebas, > > In order to achieve more consistency across repositories, we've renamed the > branch frameworks-scratch to frameworks in kde-runtime. Please do not push > to > frameworks-scratch anymore. (Ben, could you block t

Re: Having a Tier 0 for cmake and git submodules

On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 10:48 PM, David Faure wrote: > On Monday 11 November 2013 01:06:33 Michael Pyne wrote: > > On Sun, November 10, 2013 20:11:07 David Faure wrote: > > > On Sunday 10 November 2013 13:44:09 Michael Pyne wrote: > > > > I would highly recommend doing something similar to what w

Re: Review Request 113506: Add a sb_all target and sb_$framework targets to make it easier to build frameworks standalone

> On Nov. 12, 2013, 5:11 p.m., Aleix Pol Gonzalez wrote: > > CMakeLists.txt, line 18 > > > > > > I don't think we want that, superbuild shouldn't be used after the > > splitting but the kde build script. We will n

Re: Superbuild in kdelibs

On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 3:52 AM, Aurélien Gâteau wrote: > Hi, > Hi, > > This morning I merged my superbuild changes in the frameworks branch. > > Superbuild support was originally enabled by default, but I turned it > off because it broke on build.kde.org. You can turn it on by passing > -DSUP

Re: Review Request 114052: Skip tests which need a window manager running

> On Nov. 23, 2013, 4:19 p.m., Albert Astals Cid wrote: > > Have you talked to with the build.kde.org guys to see if we can get such a > > window manager running? > > Martin Gräßlin wrote: > [12:21] bcooksley: fyi > https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/114052/ > [12:22] mgraesslin: oki,

Re: Superbuild in kdelibs

On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 2:33 AM, Aurélien Gâteau wrote: > Le vendredi 22 novembre 2013 19:55:52 Ben Cooksley a écrit : > > On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 3:52 AM, Aurélien Gâteau > wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > Hi, > > > > > This morning I merge

Re: Superbuild in kdelibs

On Nov 28, 2013 7:26 AM, "Aurélien Gâteau" wrote: > > Le mercredi 27 novembre 2013 10:16:57 Ben Cooksley a écrit : > > Hi, > > > > > I just disabled it, so that you can give it a try. Can you modify kdelibs > > > job > > > definition so tha

Re: Superbuild in kdelibs

On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 9:10 AM, Aurélien Gâteau wrote: > Le jeudi 28 novembre 2013 07:41:19 Ben Cooksley a écrit : > > On Nov 28, 2013 7:26 AM, "Aurélien Gâteau" wrote: > > > Le mercredi 27 novembre 2013 10:16:57 Ben Cooksley a écrit : > > > > Hi, >

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: kdelibs_frameworks_qt5 #1806

On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 1:28 PM, David Faure wrote: > On Sunday 01 December 2013 23:43:02 KDE CI System wrote: > > -- Performing Test __KDE_HAVE_W_OVERLOADED_VIRTUAL > > -- Performing Test __KDE_HAVE_W_OVERLOADED_VIRTUAL - Success > > -- Performing Test COMPILER_HAS_HIDDEN_VISIBILITY > > -- Perfor

Changes to the CI system

es the build to fail, indicating a behaviour change has taken place. I have patched around this to allow those projects dependent on opencv to compile successfully. If there are any issues with these changes, please let sysadmin know through the usual mechanisms. Thanks, Ben C

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: kdelibs_frameworks_qt5 #1806

On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 10:55 AM, Daniele E. Domenichelli < daniele.domeniche...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello Ben, > Hi Daniele, > > On 02/12/13 08:25, Ben Cooksley wrote: > > As a temporary workaround, to keep the CI system functional I have > > reverted to the las

Re: Let's get in release mode!

On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 10:18 AM, Kevin Ottens wrote: > On Sunday 15 December 2013 10:58:35 Alex Merry wrote: > > On 14/12/13 19:30, Kevin Ottens wrote: > > > Now we're really getting there! Epics and review board are clean, > thanks > > > to > > > everyone who helped to get there. Now it's the t

Re: Let's get in release mode!

On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 1:04 PM, Ben Cooksley wrote: > On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 10:18 AM, Kevin Ottens wrote: > >> On Sunday 15 December 2013 10:58:35 Alex Merry wrote: >> > On 14/12/13 19:30, Kevin Ottens wrote: >> > > Now we're really getting there! Epics

Re: Let's get in release mode!

On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 9:37 PM, David Faure wrote: > On Tuesday 17 December 2013 14:10:56 Ben Cooksley wrote: > > I do have some reservations as to the name of quite a few of those > > repositories however as they are very generic - and thus tread on common > > names

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >