Kevin Ottens wrote:
> On Sunday 04 December 2011 23:53:14 Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
>> this should be bumped imho to reflect that this is the "5.0" version.
>> should we do the usual "4.90"?
>
> Sounds good to me, I even stupidly assumed it was already the case but
> didn't check. :-)
>
> Regards.
On Monday 05 December 2011 15:00:17 Mario Fux wrote:
> Am Sonntag 04 Dezember 2011, 23.53:14 schrieb Aaron J. Seigo:
> > hi..
>
> Morning
>
> > currently in the top level CMakeLists.txt file in frameworks we have this:
> I've now idea if this is complete bullshit and not necessary at all but I
>
Am Sonntag 04 Dezember 2011, 23.53:14 schrieb Aaron J. Seigo:
> hi..
Morning
> currently in the top level CMakeLists.txt file in frameworks we have this:
I've now idea if this is complete bullshit and not necessary at all but I dare
to mention it nonetheless...
> set (KDE_VERSION_MAJOR 4)
> se
On Sunday 04 December 2011 23:53:14 Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> this should be bumped imho to reflect that this is the "5.0" version. should
> we do the usual "4.90"?
Sounds good to me, I even stupidly assumed it was already the case but didn't
check. :-)
Regards.
--
Kévin Ottens, http://ervin.ipsqua
hi..
currently in the top level CMakeLists.txt file in frameworks we have this:
set (KDE_VERSION_MAJOR 4)
set (KDE_VERSION_MINOR 7)
set (KDE_VERSION_RELEASE 40)
set (KDE_VERSION "${KDE_VERSION_MAJOR}.${KDE_VERSION_MINOR}.
${KDE_VERSION_RELEASE}" )
set (KDE_VERSION_STRING "${KDE_VERSION} (4.7.40
