Hello,
On Saturday 17 March 2012 19:23:27 Stephen Kelly wrote:
> Am I the only person who values browsable history? Repositories where you
> can run gitk and see something useful.
No, you can count me partly in. :-)
That said, you shouldn't make the issue worse than it really is. Part of that
is
On Friday 16 March 2012 21:31:11 Alexander Neundorf wrote:
> Sounds good.
> But OTOH, having one workflow for KDE frameworks (i.e. not even all of KDE
> SC) would be also a really good thing to have. It will make contributing
> easier.
That's pretty much Aaron's point yes. And I clearly see the va
On Friday 16 March 2012, Kevin Ottens wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Wednesday 14 March 2012 14:38:19 Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> > [...]
> > this is what really piques my interest: merge based workflow.
> >
> > an integration branch would be fantastic. that branch should rebase
> > periodically off of maste
Hello,
There's an ongoing discussion on the plasma-devel list about workflows and
especially git. Since that's a topic we touched during Platform11, and that my
thinking there evolved quite a bit since I'm forwarding my contribution to the
thread here as well, at least for reference purpose.
I
