On Thursday 29 January 2015 11:56:51 Kevin Ottens wrote:
> On Thursday 29 January 2015 09:49:58 Ivan Čukić wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > So, the thread died out again.
> >
> > Who is in favour of the following:
> > - Require MSVC10 like (aka status quo)
> > - Require MSVC11
> > - Require MSVC12
>
>
> My opinion is still the same on this matter: VS2012 (aka MSVC11).
I guessed as much. Just wanted to get the ball rolling again so that
we can reach a decision, instead of just talking about it.
I also think that (while insufficient for the most fun things of
c++11) MSVC11 (VS12) is the currentl
On Thursday 29 January 2015 09:49:58 Ivan Čukić wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> So, the thread died out again.
>
> Who is in favour of the following:
> - Require MSVC10 like (aka status quo)
> - Require MSVC11
> - Require MSVC12
My opinion is still the same on this matter: VS2012 (aka MSVC11).
Regards.
--
+1 for VC12 (I'm using msvc 2013)
--
Andrius.
2015-01-29 6:49 GMT-02:00 Ivan Čukić :
> Hi all,
>
> So, the thread died out again.
>
> Who is in favour of the following:
> - Require MSVC10 like (aka status quo)
> - Require MSVC11
> - Require MSVC12
>
> (it would be nice to get the input from kde
Hi all,
So, the thread died out again.
Who is in favour of the following:
- Require MSVC10 like (aka status quo)
- Require MSVC11
- Require MSVC12
(it would be nice to get the input from kde windows guys as well)
Cheerio,
Ivan
On 17 November 2014 at 14:41, Kai Uwe Broulik wrote:
>
>> > > -
> > > - initializer lists
> > Unsupported on VS2012.
>
> Again, seems to be that CTP thingie, damn. (though, again, the initializer
> lists should also be tested - maybe they also work if the number of arguments
> is less than ...)
I've had problems with them even on VS2013, like return QHash({
El domingo, 16 de noviembre de 2014, Ivan Čukić
escribió:
> Hi,
>
> The topic of increasing the compiler versions we require might have been
> started for the specific issue one of the frameworks had, but I think it
> shouldn't have died out when the issue in question got patched.
>
The issue in
> El 17/11/2014, a las 06:03, Ivan Čukić escribió:
>
>> On Monday, 17 November 2014 07:33:00 Kevin Ottens wrote:
>>> On Sunday 16 November 2014 18:01:04 Ivan Čukić wrote:
>>> - initializer lists
>> Unsupported on VS2012.
>
> Again, seems to be that CTP thingie, damn. (though, again, the initial
> Yeah, it looks like I've been looking at the CTP from November 2012 - for
> VS11 [1]. It would be awesome if somebody who has VS11 actually
> investigated this. Namely, the 11.0 proper should support variadics up to
> some number of arguments (yes, sounds really daft and hackish). If true, it
>
On Monday, 17 November 2014 07:33:00 Kevin Ottens wrote:
> On Sunday 16 November 2014 18:01:04 Ivan Čukić wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > The topic of increasing the compiler versions we require might have been
> > started for the specific issue one of the frameworks had, but I think it
> > shouldn't have
On Sunday 16 November 2014 18:01:04 Ivan Čukić wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The topic of increasing the compiler versions we require might have been
> started for the specific issue one of the frameworks had, but I think it
> shouldn't have died out when the issue in question got patched.
>
> IMO, this topic
Hi,
The topic of increasing the compiler versions we require might have been
started for the specific issue one of the frameworks had, but I think it
shouldn't have died out when the issue in question got patched.
IMO, this topic requires more consideration.
Some of the features that we could us
2014-11-05 15:18 GMT-03:00 Nicolás Alvarez :
> 2014-11-05 10:35 GMT-03:00 Kevin Ottens :
>> VS2012 hits the sweet spot of being relatively widespread while starting to
>> have a useful subset of C++11 (case in point ktexteditor which prompted this
>> thread builds with it).
>
> Actually I just foun
> Actually I just found it doesn't build with VS2012 either, ugh. And I
> expected the fixes to be easier, but it seems I still have to fix the
> unit test full of brace initializers for 2012 to work.
I will fix that, after all it's my fault it looks like this. Just tell
me what features I can't us
2014-11-05 10:35 GMT-03:00 Kevin Ottens :
> VS2012 hits the sweet spot of being relatively widespread while starting to
> have a useful subset of C++11 (case in point ktexteditor which prompted this
> thread builds with it).
Actually I just found it doesn't build with VS2012 either, ugh. And I
exp
On Wednesday 05 November 2014 14:35:07 Kevin Ottens wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Wednesday 05 November 2014 09:25:27 Mirko Boehm wrote:
> > > On 05 Nov 2014, at 09:02, Kevin Ottens wrote:
> > >> I propose to bump the required compiler versions across the board to
> > >> compilers that fully 100% implem
Hello,
On Wednesday 05 November 2014 09:25:27 Mirko Boehm wrote:
> > On 05 Nov 2014, at 09:02, Kevin Ottens wrote:
> >> I propose to bump the required compiler versions across the board to
> >> compilers that fully 100% implement C++11. It is 2014 and C++14 is
> >> finalised. And we are a Free So
On Wednesday, November 05, 2014 12:33:58 AM Nicolás Alvarez wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> According to https://community.kde.org/Frameworks/C++11, KDE
> Frameworks support MSVC2010 and later versions. Since ktexteditor is
> part of KF5, it is supposed to work on MSVC2010. It currently doesn't;
> several un
> 2014-11-05 9:58 GMT+02:00 Martin Graesslin :
> > On Wednesday 05 November 2014 08:53:42 Mirko Boehm wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> > On 05 Nov 2014, at 04:33, Nicolás Alvarez
> >> > wrote:
> >> >
> >> > So, I hereby propose making an exception and bumping the minimum
> >> > compiler version *for ktex
2014-11-05 9:58 GMT+02:00 Martin Graesslin :
> On Wednesday 05 November 2014 08:53:42 Mirko Boehm wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> > On 05 Nov 2014, at 04:33, Nicolás Alvarez
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> > So, I hereby propose making an exception and bumping the minimum
>> > compiler version *for ktexteditor only* to M
On Wed, Nov 5, 2014 at 9:07 PM, Kevin Ottens wrote:
> Hello,
Hi all,
>
> On Wednesday 05 November 2014 08:58:04 Martin Graesslin wrote:
>> So in stead of adding one exception after the other, just go the full way
>> and raise the requirement.
>
> I'm rather against per framework exception too. T
Hi!
> On 05 Nov 2014, at 09:02, Kevin Ottens wrote:
>
>> I propose to bump the required compiler versions across the board to
>> compilers that fully 100% implement C++11. It is 2014 and C++14 is
>> finalised. And we are a Free Software project and none of our compilers
>> have any problems with
On Wednesday 05 November 2014 09:05:19 Milian Wolff wrote:
> On Wednesday 05 November 2014 00:33:58 Nicolás Alvarez wrote:
> > So, I hereby propose making an exception and bumping the minimum
> > compiler version *for ktexteditor only* to MSVC2012. Opinions?
>
> OK from my side, but I'd say Christ
Hello,
On Wednesday 05 November 2014 08:58:04 Martin Graesslin wrote:
> So in stead of adding one exception after the other, just go the full way
> and raise the requirement.
I'm rather against per framework exception too. That said, raising the
requirement should be done responsibly regarding t
On Wednesday 05 November 2014 00:33:58 Nicolás Alvarez wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> According to https://community.kde.org/Frameworks/C++11, KDE
> Frameworks support MSVC2010 and later versions. Since ktexteditor is
> part of KF5, it is supposed to work on MSVC2010. It currently doesn't;
> several unsuppo
On Wednesday 05 November 2014 08:53:42 Mirko Boehm wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > On 05 Nov 2014, at 04:33, Nicolás Alvarez
> > wrote:
> >
> > So, I hereby propose making an exception and bumping the minimum
> > compiler version *for ktexteditor only* to MSVC2012. Opinions?
>
> I propose to bump the requir
On Wednesday 05 November 2014 08:53:42 Mirko Boehm wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > On 05 Nov 2014, at 04:33, Nicolás Alvarez
> > wrote:
> >
> > So, I hereby propose making an exception and bumping the minimum
> > compiler version *for ktexteditor only* to MSVC2012. Opinions?
>
> I propose to bump the requir
Hi,
> On 05 Nov 2014, at 04:33, Nicolás Alvarez wrote:
>
> So, I hereby propose making an exception and bumping the minimum
> compiler version *for ktexteditor only* to MSVC2012. Opinions?
I propose to bump the required compiler versions across the board to compilers
that fully 100% implemen
Hi all,
According to https://community.kde.org/Frameworks/C++11, KDE
Frameworks support MSVC2010 and later versions. Since ktexteditor is
part of KF5, it is supposed to work on MSVC2010. It currently doesn't;
several unsupported C++11 features were introduced to the library in
the past few months.
29 matches
Mail list logo
