---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/129607/
---
(Updated Dec. 9, 2016, 7:08 a.m.)
Status
--
This change has been mar
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/129607/#review101330
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Sebastian Kügler
On Dec. 7, 2016,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/129607/
---
(Updated Dec. 7, 2016, 11:31 a.m.)
Review request for KDE Frameworks, KDE
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/129607/
---
(Updated Dec. 7, 2016, 11:30 a.m.)
Review request for KDE Frameworks, KDE
> On Дек. 3, 2016, 6:48 след обяд, Martin Klapetek wrote:
> > How about "Using" for the title of the tab and then removing the "Using"
> > label from inside the tab?
> >
> > Also, +1 to putting the version front.
>
> Thomas Pfeiffer wrote:
> Hm, "Using" sounds a bit weird without context,
> On Dec. 3, 2016, 4:48 p.m., Martin Klapetek wrote:
> > How about "Using" for the title of the tab and then removing the "Using"
> > label from inside the tab?
> >
> > Also, +1 to putting the version front.
>
> Thomas Pfeiffer wrote:
> Hm, "Using" sounds a bit weird without context, but "
> On Dec. 3, 2016, 5:48 p.m., Martin Klapetek wrote:
> > How about "Using" for the title of the tab and then removing the "Using"
> > label from inside the tab?
> >
> > Also, +1 to putting the version front.
>
> Thomas Pfeiffer wrote:
> Hm, "Using" sounds a bit weird without context, but "
> On Dec. 3, 2016, 4:48 p.m., Martin Klapetek wrote:
> > How about "Using" for the title of the tab and then removing the "Using"
> > label from inside the tab?
> >
> > Also, +1 to putting the version front.
Hm, "Using" sounds a bit weird without context, but "Libraries" or maybe
"Libraries u
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/129607/#review101247
---
How about "Using" for the title of the tab and then removing
> On Dec. 3, 2016, 2:29 p.m., Sebastian Kügler wrote:
> > I understand the problem, but I don't like the duplication you're
> > introducing with this patch: The version number is now on the screen two
> > times when you open the versions tab, and also, why have a versions tab,
> > when the ver
> On Dic. 3, 2016, 2:29 p.m., Sebastian Kügler wrote:
> > I understand the problem, but I don't like the duplication you're
> > introducing with this patch: The version number is now on the screen two
> > times when you open the versions tab, and also, why have a versions tab,
> > when the ver
> On Dec. 3, 2016, 2:29 p.m., Sebastian Kügler wrote:
> > I understand the problem, but I don't like the duplication you're
> > introducing with this patch: The version number is now on the screen two
> > times when you open the versions tab, and also, why have a versions tab,
> > when the ver
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/129607/
---
(Updated Dec. 3, 2016, 1:39 p.m.)
Review request for KDE Frameworks, KDE
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/129607/
---
(Updated Dec. 3, 2016, 1:39 p.m.)
Review request for KDE Frameworks, KDE
> On Dic. 3, 2016, 2:29 p.m., Sebastian Kügler wrote:
> > I understand the problem, but I don't like the duplication you're
> > introducing with this patch: The version number is now on the screen two
> > times when you open the versions tab, and also, why have a versions tab,
> > when the ver
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/129607/#review101235
---
I understand the problem, but I don't like the duplication y
> On Dic. 3, 2016, 1:28 p.m., Martin Gräßlin wrote:
> > As the one who did the mentioned change: -1 to this
> >
> > Please note that this change was done in coordination with the usability
> > group. So please add our usability experts to this review request.
>
> Martin Gräßlin wrote:
> I
> On Dec. 3, 2016, 1:28 p.m., Martin Gräßlin wrote:
> > As the one who did the mentioned change: -1 to this
> >
> > Please note that this change was done in coordination with the usability
> > group. So please add our usability experts to this review request.
>
> Martin Gräßlin wrote:
> I
> On Dec. 3, 2016, 1:28 p.m., Martin Gräßlin wrote:
> > As the one who did the mentioned change: -1 to this
> >
> > Please note that this change was done in coordination with the usability
> > group. So please add our usability experts to this review request.
I think I should explain a little
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/129607/#review101229
---
As the one who did the mentioned change: -1 to this
Please
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/129607/#review101228
---
+1, I also find the additional click annoying.
Though with
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/129607/
---
Review request for KDE Frameworks.
Repository: kxmlgui
Description
22 matches
Mail list logo
