Re: Review Request 127959: Adding missing license

2016-07-22 Thread Maximiliano Curia
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/127959/ --- (Updated July 22, 2016, 9:49 a.m.) Status -- This change has been ma

Re: Review Request 127959: Adding missing license

2016-06-12 Thread Martin Tobias Holmedahl Sandsmark
> On May 19, 2016, 3:35 p.m., Martin Gräßlin wrote: > > I would prefer that we properly investigate each of the cases. E.g. > > plasma-framework showed that the files are just incorrectly licensed. this would probably be optimal, and there's some of those files that could probably be removed (

Re: Review Request 127959: Adding missing license

2016-06-12 Thread Martin Tobias Holmedahl Sandsmark
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/127959/#review96370 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Martin Tobias Holmedahl Sandsmark O

Re: Review Request 127959: Adding missing license

2016-05-19 Thread Martin Gräßlin
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/127959/#review95623 --- I would prefer that we properly investigate each of the cases

Review Request 127959: Adding missing license

2016-05-19 Thread Maximiliano Curia
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/127959/ --- Review request for KDE Frameworks and Martin Tobias Holmedahl Sandsmark.