> On Мај 1, 2016, 6:40 по п., Chusslove Illich wrote:
> > To have localized numbers is the expected behavior (and documented as
> > such). But it was "temporarily" disabled between kdelibs and KF5, until
> > replacements for KLocale were decided. I don't remember why I didn't switch
> > to %L1
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/127800/
---
(Updated Feb. 8, 2017, 2:10 nachm.)
Status
--
This change has been d
> On Мај 1, 2016, 6:40 по п., Chusslove Illich wrote:
> > To have localized numbers is the expected behavior (and documented as
> > such). But it was "temporarily" disabled between kdelibs and KF5, until
> > replacements for KLocale were decided. I don't remember why I didn't switch
> > to %L1
> On Mai 1, 2016, 4:40 nachm., Chusslove Illich wrote:
> > To have localized numbers is the expected behavior (and documented as
> > such). But it was "temporarily" disabled between kdelibs and KF5, until
> > replacements for KLocale were decided. I don't remember why I didn't switch
> > to %L
> On Мај 1, 2016, 6:40 по п., Chusslove Illich wrote:
> > To have localized numbers is the expected behavior (and documented as
> > such). But it was "temporarily" disabled between kdelibs and KF5, until
> > replacements for KLocale were decided. I don't remember why I didn't switch
> > to %L1
> On Mai 1, 2016, 4:40 nachm., Chusslove Illich wrote:
> > To have localized numbers is the expected behavior (and documented as
> > such). But it was "temporarily" disabled between kdelibs and KF5, until
> > replacements for KLocale were decided. I don't remember why I didn't switch
> > to %L
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/127800/#review95056
---
To have localized numbers is the expected behavior (and docum
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/127800/
---
Review request for KDE Frameworks.
Repository: ki18n
Description
--
