Re: Review Request 125936: Update KProtocolManager after configuration change.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/125936/ --- (Updated Nov. 11, 2015, 7:30 p.m.) Status -- This change has been ma

Re: Review Request 125936: Update KProtocolManager after configuration change.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/125936/#review88251 --- Ship it! OK, that explains it. I was assuming this process wo

Re: Review Request 125936: Update KProtocolManager after configuration change.

> On Nov. 6, 2015, 8:02 a.m., David Faure wrote: > > src/kcms/kio/cache.cpp, line 91 > > > > > > Isn't this done by the call to updateRunningIOSlaves just below, which > > sends the DBus signal "reparseSlaveConfi

Re: Review Request 125936: Update KProtocolManager after configuration change.

> On Nov. 6, 2015, 8:02 a.m., David Faure wrote: > > src/kcms/kio/cache.cpp, line 91 > > > > > > Isn't this done by the call to updateRunningIOSlaves just below, which > > sends the DBus signal "reparseSlaveConfi

Re: Review Request 125936: Update KProtocolManager after configuration change.

> On Nov. 6, 2015, 8:02 vorm., David Faure wrote: > > src/kcms/kio/cache.cpp, line 91 > > > > > > Isn't this done by the call to updateRunningIOSlaves just below, which > > sends the DBus signal "reparseSlaveConf

Re: Review Request 125936: Update KProtocolManager after configuration change.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/125936/#review88081 --- src/kcms/kio/cache.cpp (line 91)

Re: Review Request 125936: Update KProtocolManager after configuration change.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/125936/ --- (Updated Nov. 4, 2015, 6:28 a.m.) Review request for KDE Frameworks and D