Re: Review Request 125259: Support multiple X servers in the NETWM classes

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/125259/ --- (Updated Sept. 30, 2015, 5:39 a.m.) Status -- This change has been m

Re: Review Request 125259: Support multiple X servers in the NETWM classes

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/125259/#review86140 --- Only going to push the autotest change now that the Thomas's p

Re: Review Request 125259: Support multiple X servers in the NETWM classes

> On Sept. 18, 2015, 12:21 nachm., Thomas Lübking wrote: > > src/platforms/xcb/netwm_p.h, line 31 > > > > > > errrhemmm ... the idea was actually to keep things more in sync and not > > have to match variable, st

Re: Review Request 125259: Support multiple X servers in the NETWM classes

> On Sept. 18, 2015, 2:21 p.m., Thomas Lübking wrote: > > src/platforms/xcb/netwm_p.h, line 31 > > > > > > errrhemmm ... the idea was actually to keep things more in sync and not > > have to match variable, strin

Re: Review Request 125259: Support multiple X servers in the NETWM classes

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/125259/#review85619 --- src/platforms/xcb/netwm_p.h (line 31)

Re: Review Request 125259: Support multiple X servers in the NETWM classes

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/125259/ --- (Updated Sept. 18, 2015, 10:19 a.m.) Review request for KDE Frameworks.

Re: Review Request 125259: Support multiple X servers in the NETWM classes

> On Sept. 16, 2015, 4:23 nachm., Thomas Lübking wrote: > > would one want to use the occasion to get rid of the bazillion variables > > mapped to a struct array and have atom(Atom a) and atomString(Atom a) for > > an array of atoms a matching string - maybe including some namespaces so > > th

Re: Review Request 125259: Support multiple X servers in the NETWM classes

> On Sept. 16, 2015, 6:23 p.m., Thomas Lübking wrote: > > would one want to use the occasion to get rid of the bazillion variables > > mapped to a struct array and have atom(Atom a) and atomString(Atom a) for > > an array of atoms a matching string - maybe including some namespaces so > > that

Re: Review Request 125259: Support multiple X servers in the NETWM classes

> On Sept. 16, 2015, 4:23 p.m., Thomas Lübking wrote: > > would one want to use the occasion to get rid of the bazillion variables > > mapped to a struct array and have atom(Atom a) and atomString(Atom a) for > > an array of atoms a matching string - maybe including some namespaces so > > that

Re: Review Request 125259: Support multiple X servers in the NETWM classes

> On Sept. 16, 2015, 6:23 p.m., Thomas Lübking wrote: > > would one want to use the occasion to get rid of the bazillion variables > > mapped to a struct array and have atom(Atom a) and atomString(Atom a) for > > an array of atoms a matching string - maybe including some namespaces so > > that

Re: Review Request 125259: Support multiple X servers in the NETWM classes

> On Sept. 16, 2015, 4:23 nachm., Thomas Lübking wrote: > > would one want to use the occasion to get rid of the bazillion variables > > mapped to a struct array and have atom(Atom a) and atomString(Atom a) for > > an array of atoms a matching string - maybe including some namespaces so > > th

Re: Review Request 125259: Support multiple X servers in the NETWM classes

> On Sept. 16, 2015, 6:23 p.m., Thomas Lübking wrote: > > would one want to use the occasion to get rid of the bazillion variables > > mapped to a struct array and have atom(Atom a) and atomString(Atom a) for > > an array of atoms a matching string - maybe including some namespaces so > > that

Re: Review Request 125259: Support multiple X servers in the NETWM classes

> On Sept. 16, 2015, 4:23 nachm., Thomas Lübking wrote: > > would one want to use the occasion to get rid of the bazillion variables > > mapped to a struct array and have atom(Atom a) and atomString(Atom a) for > > an array of atoms a matching string - maybe including some namespaces so > > th

Re: Review Request 125259: Support multiple X servers in the NETWM classes

> On Sept. 16, 2015, 6:23 p.m., Thomas Lübking wrote: > > would one want to use the occasion to get rid of the bazillion variables > > mapped to a struct array and have atom(Atom a) and atomString(Atom a) for > > an array of atoms a matching string - maybe including some namespaces so > > that

Re: Review Request 125259: Support multiple X servers in the NETWM classes

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/125259/#review85501 --- would one want to use the occasion to get rid of the bazillion

Review Request 125259: Support multiple X servers in the NETWM classes

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/125259/ --- Review request for KDE Frameworks and kwin. Repository: kwindowsystem D