On Sun, Sep 14, 2014 at 4:42 PM, Matthew Dawson wrote:
> On September 12, 2014 03:19:13 AM Ben Cooksley wrote:
>> > On Sept. 8, 2014, 10:22 p.m., Ben Cooksley wrote:
>> > Matthew Dawson wrote:
>> > I don't think upstream would be happy with the patch, as it hijacks
>> > the moderator email
On September 12, 2014 03:19:13 AM Ben Cooksley wrote:
> > On Sept. 8, 2014, 10:22 p.m., Ben Cooksley wrote:
> > Matthew Dawson wrote:
> > I don't think upstream would be happy with the patch, as it hijacks
> > the moderator emails (which should link to the admin page) to send
> > out no
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119991/
---
(Updated Sept. 12, 2014, 9:24 a.m.)
Status
--
This change has been m
> On Sept. 8, 2014, 10:22 p.m., Ben Cooksley wrote:
> > What is the status of this? Is there anything blocking it being shipped and
> > made available on api.kde.org?
>
> Denis Steckelmacher wrote:
> It works locally, so I'm just waiting for a ship-it or other comments :-)
>
> Aleix Pol Go
> On Sept. 8, 2014, 6:22 p.m., Ben Cooksley wrote:
> > What is the status of this? Is there anything blocking it being shipped and
> > made available on api.kde.org?
>
> Denis Steckelmacher wrote:
> It works locally, so I'm just waiting for a ship-it or other comments :-)
>
> Aleix Pol Gon
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119991/#review66315
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Matthew Dawson
On Aug. 29, 2014, 10:16
> On Sept. 8, 2014, 10:22 p.m., Ben Cooksley wrote:
> > What is the status of this? Is there anything blocking it being shipped and
> > made available on api.kde.org?
>
> Denis Steckelmacher wrote:
> It works locally, so I'm just waiting for a ship-it or other comments :-)
>
> Aleix Pol Go
> On Sept. 8, 2014, 6:22 p.m., Ben Cooksley wrote:
> > What is the status of this? Is there anything blocking it being shipped and
> > made available on api.kde.org?
>
> Denis Steckelmacher wrote:
> It works locally, so I'm just waiting for a ship-it or other comments :-)
>
> Aleix Pol Gon
> On Sept. 8, 2014, 10:22 p.m., Ben Cooksley wrote:
> > What is the status of this? Is there anything blocking it being shipped and
> > made available on api.kde.org?
>
> Denis Steckelmacher wrote:
> It works locally, so I'm just waiting for a ship-it or other comments :-)
>
> Aleix Pol Go
> On Sept. 8, 2014, 10:22 p.m., Ben Cooksley wrote:
> > What is the status of this? Is there anything blocking it being shipped and
> > made available on api.kde.org?
>
> Denis Steckelmacher wrote:
> It works locally, so I'm just waiting for a ship-it or other comments :-)
Let's see if we
> On Sept. 8, 2014, 10:22 p.m., Ben Cooksley wrote:
> > What is the status of this? Is there anything blocking it being shipped and
> > made available on api.kde.org?
It works locally, so I'm just waiting for a ship-it or other comments :-)
- Denis
--
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119991/#review66088
---
What is the status of this? Is there anything blocking it bein
> On Aug. 29, 2014, 2:42 p.m., Matthew Dawson wrote:
> > This looks really awesome. Is there some way for maintainers (or other
> > interested parties) to watch their framework's comments, to be on the look
> > out for any interesting conversation? Users may make comments about the
> > API's
> On Aug. 29, 2014, 2:42 p.m., Matthew Dawson wrote:
> > This looks really awesome. Is there some way for maintainers (or other
> > interested parties) to watch their framework's comments, to be on the look
> > out for any interesting conversation? Users may make comments about the
> > API's
> On Aug. 29, 2014, 2:42 p.m., Matthew Dawson wrote:
> > This looks really awesome. Is there some way for maintainers (or other
> > interested parties) to watch their framework's comments, to be on the look
> > out for any interesting conversation? Users may make comments about the
> > API's
> On Aug. 29, 2014, 2:42 p.m., Matthew Dawson wrote:
> > This looks really awesome. Is there some way for maintainers (or other
> > interested parties) to watch their framework's comments, to be on the look
> > out for any interesting conversation? Users may make comments about the
> > API's
> On Aug. 29, 2014, 2:42 p.m., Matthew Dawson wrote:
> > This looks really awesome. Is there some way for maintainers (or other
> > interested parties) to watch their framework's comments, to be on the look
> > out for any interesting conversation? Users may make comments about the
> > API's
> On Aug. 29, 2014, 2:42 p.m., Matthew Dawson wrote:
> > This looks really awesome. Is there some way for maintainers (or other
> > interested parties) to watch their framework's comments, to be on the look
> > out for any interesting conversation? Users may make comments about the
> > API's
> On Aug. 29, 2014, 2:42 p.m., Matthew Dawson wrote:
> > This looks really awesome. Is there some way for maintainers (or other
> > interested parties) to watch their framework's comments, to be on the look
> > out for any interesting conversation? Users may make comments about the
> > API's
> On ago. 29, 2014, 2:42 p.m., Matthew Dawson wrote:
> > This looks really awesome. Is there some way for maintainers (or other
> > interested parties) to watch their framework's comments, to be on the look
> > out for any interesting conversation? Users may make comments about the
> > API's
> On Aug. 29, 2014, 2:42 p.m., Matthew Dawson wrote:
> > This looks really awesome. Is there some way for maintainers (or other
> > interested parties) to watch their framework's comments, to be on the look
> > out for any interesting conversation? Users may make comments about the
> > API's
> On Aug. 29, 2014, 2:42 p.m., Matthew Dawson wrote:
> > This looks really awesome. Is there some way for maintainers (or other
> > interested parties) to watch their framework's comments, to be on the look
> > out for any interesting conversation? Users may make comments about the
> > API's
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119991/#review65506
---
This looks really awesome. Is there some way for maintainers
> On Aug. 29, 2014, 2:23 p.m., Aleix Pol Gonzalez wrote:
> > Do we have any identification system? How do we know the comments are from
> > human?
The user provides a pseudo and an e-mail, but no registration is needed.
Akismet is a big online database of spamming IPs and also (I think) an ant
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119991/#review65504
---
Do we have any identification system? How do we know the comme
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119991/
---
Review request for KDE Frameworks and Aurélien Gâteau.
Repository: kapido
26 matches
Mail list logo
