---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/106970/#review22580
---
This review has been submitted with commit
7500c995162ac56dd62
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/106970/#review22394
---
Ship it!
I'm not an ECM expert, but this looks good to me.
I'd
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/106970/
---
(Updated Nov. 3, 2012, 8:26 a.m.)
Review request for KDE Frameworks and Ph
> On Oct. 31, 2012, 4:58 p.m., David Faure wrote:
> > The circular dependency (due to libinqt5 being in kdelibs currently) will
> > make building a bit harder though. Shouldn't ECM be fixed NOT to require
> > libinqt5?
>
> Jon Severinsson wrote:
> There is no circular dependency, as libinq
> On Oct. 31, 2012, 4:58 p.m., David Faure wrote:
> > The circular dependency (due to libinqt5 being in kdelibs currently) will
> > make building a bit harder though. Shouldn't ECM be fixed NOT to require
> > libinqt5?
>
> Jon Severinsson wrote:
> There is no circular dependency, as libinq
> On Oct. 31, 2012, 4:58 p.m., David Faure wrote:
> > The circular dependency (due to libinqt5 being in kdelibs currently) will
> > make building a bit harder though. Shouldn't ECM be fixed NOT to require
> > libinqt5?
There is no circular dependency, as libinqt5 does not depend on Phonon. The
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/106970/#review21251
---
The circular dependency (due to libinqt5 being in kdelibs curre
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/106970/#review21244
---
Over a week and still no comments. If no one objects in the nex
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/106970/
---
Review request for KDE Frameworks and Phonon.
Description
---
This pa