On Tuesday, 30 December 2014 09:32:08 CEST, David Faure wrote:
Ideally every released minor version since 5.2 :-)
i.e. 5.2, 5.3, 5.4. Possibly even dev.
Hi,
the CI which is plugged into Gerrit now checks the following combinations:
- Qt 5.2.1, GCC 4.8.2 (RHEL7), release mode
- Qt 5.3.2, clang
On Tuesday 30 December 2014 10:02:38 David Faure wrote:
> On Tuesday 30 December 2014 21:50:40 Ben Cooksley wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 30, 2014 at 9:47 PM, David Faure wrote:
> > > On Tuesday 30 December 2014 21:41:10 Ben Cooksley wrote:
> > >> We test the variants noted by "kf5-qt5" and "stable-kf5-q
On Tue, Dec 30, 2014 at 10:02 PM, David Faure wrote:
> On Tuesday 30 December 2014 21:50:40 Ben Cooksley wrote:
>> On Tue, Dec 30, 2014 at 9:47 PM, David Faure wrote:
>> > On Tuesday 30 December 2014 21:41:10 Ben Cooksley wrote:
>> >> We test the variants noted by "kf5-qt5" and "stable-kf5-qt5" i
On Tuesday 30 December 2014 21:50:40 Ben Cooksley wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 30, 2014 at 9:47 PM, David Faure wrote:
> > On Tuesday 30 December 2014 21:41:10 Ben Cooksley wrote:
> >> We test the variants noted by "kf5-qt5" and "stable-kf5-qt5" in the
> >> build metadata for Qt.
> >
> > Yes - the (impli
On Tue, Dec 30, 2014 at 9:47 PM, David Faure wrote:
> On Tuesday 30 December 2014 21:41:10 Ben Cooksley wrote:
>> We test the variants noted by "kf5-qt5" and "stable-kf5-qt5" in the
>> build metadata for Qt.
>
> Yes - the (implicit) question was, what version of Qt do these point to ;-)
kf5-qt5 =
On Tuesday 30 December 2014 21:41:10 Ben Cooksley wrote:
> We test the variants noted by "kf5-qt5" and "stable-kf5-qt5" in the
> build metadata for Qt.
Yes - the (implicit) question was, what version of Qt do these point to ;-)
--
David Faure, fa...@kde.org, http://www.davidfaure.fr
Working on K
On Tue, Dec 30, 2014 at 9:32 PM, David Faure wrote:
> On Monday 29 December 2014 17:46:03 Jan Kundrát wrote:
>> Hi,
>> is there a minimal required Qt version which applies to all of KF5? I see
>> that most of the modules I currently have checked out say that they need
>> 5.2.0 while polkit-qt-1 de
On Monday 29 December 2014 17:46:03 Jan Kundrát wrote:
> Hi,
> is there a minimal required Qt version which applies to all of KF5? I see
> that most of the modules I currently have checked out say that they need
> 5.2.0 while polkit-qt-1 declares itself compatible with 5.1.0.
polkit-qt-1 isn't a K
Hi,
is there a minimal required Qt version which applies to all of KF5? I see
that most of the modules I currently have checked out say that they need
5.2.0 while polkit-qt-1 declares itself compatible with 5.1.0.
- Is that information correct? Is 5.2.0 universally supported?
- Is there any va
