Re: Removing WinCE support

2013-02-09 Thread Alexander Neundorf
On Thursday 10 May 2012, Alexander Neundorf wrote: > On Thursday 10 May 2012, Volker Krause wrote: > > On Wednesday 09 May 2012 16:47:17 Stephen Kelly wrote: > > > Alexander Neundorf wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > KDAB made kdelibs in some way work with Win CE. > > > > > > > > Now Win CE is a

Re: Removing WinCE support

2012-05-10 Thread Alexander Neundorf
On Thursday 10 May 2012, Volker Krause wrote: > On Wednesday 09 May 2012 16:47:17 Stephen Kelly wrote: > > Alexander Neundorf wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > KDAB made kdelibs in some way work with Win CE. > > > > > > Now Win CE is a very different OS, and IMO we should not even strive to > > > port

Re: Removing WinCE support

2012-05-09 Thread Volker Krause
On Wednesday 09 May 2012 16:47:17 Stephen Kelly wrote: > Alexander Neundorf wrote: > > Hi, > > > > KDAB made kdelibs in some way work with Win CE. > > > > Now Win CE is a very different OS, and IMO we should not even strive to > > port KDE to such OSs (limitations in address space per process, st

Re: Removing WinCE support

2012-05-09 Thread Stephen Kelly
Alexander Neundorf wrote: > Hi, > > KDAB made kdelibs in some way work with Win CE. > > Now Win CE is a very different OS, and IMO we should not even strive to > port KDE to such OSs (limitations in address space per process, static > linking only, etc.). This is not anti-MS, this also applies f

Removing WinCE support

2012-05-08 Thread Alexander Neundorf
Hi, KDAB made kdelibs in some way work with Win CE. Now Win CE is a very different OS, and IMO we should not even strive to port KDE to such OSs (limitations in address space per process, static linking only, etc.). This is not anti-MS, this also applies for other embedded OSs like e.g. eCos.