Re: building Solid

2014-02-26 Thread Michael Pyne
On Wed, February 26, 2014 13:51:52 Dominik Haumann wrote: > PS: It's never (!) a good idea to add a custom type that has Q* naming > style. It leads to totally unnecessary issues like this one ;) I agree completely with this. If we add a typedef it should always be with a symbol under our own

Re: Re: Re: building Solid

2014-02-26 Thread Dominik Haumann
On Wednesday, February 26, 2014 07:52:21 Martin Gräßlin wrote: > On Tuesday 25 February 2014 21:27:02 Dominik Haumann wrote: > > On Tuesday 25 February 2014 20:34:38 Dominik Haumann wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > a fresh Qt5 from stable branch, and a fresh frameworks build results in > > > this er

Re: Re: building Solid

2014-02-25 Thread Martin Gräßlin
On Tuesday 25 February 2014 21:27:02 Dominik Haumann wrote: > On Tuesday 25 February 2014 20:34:38 Dominik Haumann wrote: > > Hi, > > > > a fresh Qt5 from stable branch, and a fresh frameworks build results in > > this error when building solid: > > > > $ make > > [ 0%] Automatic moc for target

Re: building Solid

2014-02-25 Thread Dominik Haumann
On Tuesday 25 February 2014 20:34:38 Dominik Haumann wrote: > Hi, > > a fresh Qt5 from stable branch, and a fresh frameworks build results in this > error when building solid: > > $ make > [ 0%] Automatic moc for target KF5Solid > [ 0%] Built target KF5Solid_automoc > [ 1%] Building CXX object