On Monday 14 October 2013 17:38:42 John Layt wrote:
> On 14 October 2013 12:55, Kevin Ottens wrote:
> > Giving it a closer look, I'm wondering: are you sure about this course of
> > action?
> > KDateTimeEdit is basically a KDateComboBox and a KTimeComboBox layouted
> > together. So deprecating tho
On 14 October 2013 12:55, Kevin Ottens wrote:
> Giving it a closer look, I'm wondering: are you sure about this course of
> action?
> KDateTimeEdit is basically a KDateComboBox and a KTimeComboBox layouted
> together. So deprecating those two without deprecating KDateTimeEdit sounds
> weird to me.
On 14 October 2013 12:55, Kevin Ottens wrote:
> Giving it a closer look, I'm wondering: are you sure about this course of
> action?
> KDateTimeEdit is basically a KDateComboBox and a KTimeComboBox layouted
> together. So deprecating those two without deprecating KDateTimeEdit sounds
> weird to me
Hello,
On Thursday 03 October 2013 18:15:22 John Layt wrote:
> KDateTimeEdit
> - My new widget to replace many local widgets, added in last kdelibs release
> - Can replace KDateComboBox, KTimeComboBox, api is almost the same - Not
> used anywhere!?!
> - API uses QDate, QTime, KDateTime, KCalendarS
Hello,
On Thursday 03 October 2013 18:15:22 John Layt wrote:
> On 24 September 2013 19:24, Kevin Ottens wrote:
> > On Tuesday 24 September 2013 19:03:21 John Layt wrote:
> >> I'll do some analysis on the use of all the widgets and what ones are
> >> worth keeping, and look at the Qt widgets to se
On 24 September 2013 19:24, Kevin Ottens wrote:
> On Tuesday 24 September 2013 19:03:21 John Layt wrote:
>> I'll do some analysis on the use of all the widgets and what ones are
>> worth keeping, and look at the Qt widgets to see if they're worth
>> switching to, if not before then at Qt Dev Days
On 27 September 2013 16:52, Kevin Ottens wrote:
> On Wednesday 25 September 2013 11:28:54 John Layt wrote:
>> Started to look at the number of uses, but lxr hardly shows any. Does
>> lxr include .ui files, or do I need to grep?
>
> I don't think it does unfortunately.
No, doesn't appear to, I'm
On 25 September 2013 17:21, Mark wrote:
>
>>
>> I've been
>> talking to the QML component guys and they will have a new calendar
>> component for 5.3 that they need QCalendarSystem for as well.
>
>
>
> Hi John,
>
> What you said there sounds very interesting to me! Do you have any link for
> me
On Wednesday 25 September 2013 11:28:54 John Layt wrote:
> On 24 September 2013 19:24, Kevin Ottens wrote:
> > On Tuesday 24 September 2013 19:03:21 John Layt wrote:
> >> I'll do some analysis on the use of all the widgets and what ones are
> >> worth keeping, and look at the Qt widgets to see if
> I've been
> talking to the QML component guys and they will have a new calendar
> component for 5.3 that they need QCalendarSystem for as well.
Hi John,
What you said there sounds very interesting to me! Do you have any link for
me where i can read about that or where current code in that a
On 24 September 2013 19:24, Kevin Ottens wrote:
> On Tuesday 24 September 2013 19:03:21 John Layt wrote:
>> I'll do some analysis on the use of all the widgets and what ones are
>> worth keeping, and look at the Qt widgets to see if they're worth
>> switching to, if not before then at Qt Dev Days
On Tuesday 24 September 2013 19:03:21 John Layt wrote:
> I'll do some analysis on the use of all the widgets and what ones are
> worth keeping, and look at the Qt widgets to see if they're worth
> switching to, if not before then at Qt Dev Days / Qt Contributors Day.
OK, I'll ignore this part of K
On 24 September 2013 12:11, Kevin Ottens wrote:
>> OK, let's attempt to move KLocale, KDateTime and friends to kde4support now.
>> With some luck we'll be able to completely get rid of KDE4Attic before
>> release.
>
> Hmm, looking at that closer... indeed it looks like we can get rid of
> K*TimeZo
On Monday 23 September 2013 09:33:54 Kevin Ottens wrote:
> On Monday 23 September 2013 09:06:33 John Layt wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I am extremely relived to announce that QTimeZone finally got merged
> > late late last night, thanks to the efforts of Thiago in fighting the
> > CI system :-) Combine
On Monday 23 September 2013 09:06:33 John Layt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am extremely relived to announce that QTimeZone finally got merged
> late late last night, thanks to the efforts of Thiago in fighting the
> CI system :-) Combined with other changes in QDateTime, this should
> mean we're free of K
Hi,
I am extremely relived to announce that QTimeZone finally got merged
late late last night, thanks to the efforts of Thiago in fighting the
CI system :-) Combined with other changes in QDateTime, this should
mean we're free of KDateTime and KTimeZone, albeit with a few caveats.
I'll be doing
16 matches
Mail list logo