Re: QTimeZone merged for 5.2

2013-10-14 Thread Kevin Ottens
On Monday 14 October 2013 17:38:42 John Layt wrote: > On 14 October 2013 12:55, Kevin Ottens wrote: > > Giving it a closer look, I'm wondering: are you sure about this course of > > action? > > KDateTimeEdit is basically a KDateComboBox and a KTimeComboBox layouted > > together. So deprecating tho

Re: QTimeZone merged for 5.2

2013-10-14 Thread John Layt
On 14 October 2013 12:55, Kevin Ottens wrote: > Giving it a closer look, I'm wondering: are you sure about this course of > action? > KDateTimeEdit is basically a KDateComboBox and a KTimeComboBox layouted > together. So deprecating those two without deprecating KDateTimeEdit sounds > weird to me.

Re: QTimeZone merged for 5.2

2013-10-14 Thread John Layt
On 14 October 2013 12:55, Kevin Ottens wrote: > Giving it a closer look, I'm wondering: are you sure about this course of > action? > KDateTimeEdit is basically a KDateComboBox and a KTimeComboBox layouted > together. So deprecating those two without deprecating KDateTimeEdit sounds > weird to me

Re: QTimeZone merged for 5.2

2013-10-14 Thread Kevin Ottens
Hello, On Thursday 03 October 2013 18:15:22 John Layt wrote: > KDateTimeEdit > - My new widget to replace many local widgets, added in last kdelibs release > - Can replace KDateComboBox, KTimeComboBox, api is almost the same - Not > used anywhere!?! > - API uses QDate, QTime, KDateTime, KCalendarS

Re: QTimeZone merged for 5.2

2013-10-07 Thread Kevin Ottens
Hello, On Thursday 03 October 2013 18:15:22 John Layt wrote: > On 24 September 2013 19:24, Kevin Ottens wrote: > > On Tuesday 24 September 2013 19:03:21 John Layt wrote: > >> I'll do some analysis on the use of all the widgets and what ones are > >> worth keeping, and look at the Qt widgets to se

Re: QTimeZone merged for 5.2

2013-10-03 Thread John Layt
On 24 September 2013 19:24, Kevin Ottens wrote: > On Tuesday 24 September 2013 19:03:21 John Layt wrote: >> I'll do some analysis on the use of all the widgets and what ones are >> worth keeping, and look at the Qt widgets to see if they're worth >> switching to, if not before then at Qt Dev Days

Re: QTimeZone merged for 5.2

2013-09-27 Thread John Layt
On 27 September 2013 16:52, Kevin Ottens wrote: > On Wednesday 25 September 2013 11:28:54 John Layt wrote: >> Started to look at the number of uses, but lxr hardly shows any. Does >> lxr include .ui files, or do I need to grep? > > I don't think it does unfortunately. No, doesn't appear to, I'm

Re: QTimeZone merged for 5.2

2013-09-27 Thread John Layt
On 25 September 2013 17:21, Mark wrote: > >> >> I've been >> talking to the QML component guys and they will have a new calendar >> component for 5.3 that they need QCalendarSystem for as well. > > > > Hi John, > > What you said there sounds very interesting to me! Do you have any link for > me

Re: QTimeZone merged for 5.2

2013-09-27 Thread Kevin Ottens
On Wednesday 25 September 2013 11:28:54 John Layt wrote: > On 24 September 2013 19:24, Kevin Ottens wrote: > > On Tuesday 24 September 2013 19:03:21 John Layt wrote: > >> I'll do some analysis on the use of all the widgets and what ones are > >> worth keeping, and look at the Qt widgets to see if

Re: QTimeZone merged for 5.2

2013-09-25 Thread Mark
> I've been > talking to the QML component guys and they will have a new calendar > component for 5.3 that they need QCalendarSystem for as well. Hi John, What you said there sounds very interesting to me! Do you have any link for me where i can read about that or where current code in that a

Re: QTimeZone merged for 5.2

2013-09-25 Thread John Layt
On 24 September 2013 19:24, Kevin Ottens wrote: > On Tuesday 24 September 2013 19:03:21 John Layt wrote: >> I'll do some analysis on the use of all the widgets and what ones are >> worth keeping, and look at the Qt widgets to see if they're worth >> switching to, if not before then at Qt Dev Days

Re: QTimeZone merged for 5.2

2013-09-24 Thread Kevin Ottens
On Tuesday 24 September 2013 19:03:21 John Layt wrote: > I'll do some analysis on the use of all the widgets and what ones are > worth keeping, and look at the Qt widgets to see if they're worth > switching to, if not before then at Qt Dev Days / Qt Contributors Day. OK, I'll ignore this part of K

Re: QTimeZone merged for 5.2

2013-09-24 Thread John Layt
On 24 September 2013 12:11, Kevin Ottens wrote: >> OK, let's attempt to move KLocale, KDateTime and friends to kde4support now. >> With some luck we'll be able to completely get rid of KDE4Attic before >> release. > > Hmm, looking at that closer... indeed it looks like we can get rid of > K*TimeZo

Re: QTimeZone merged for 5.2

2013-09-24 Thread Kevin Ottens
On Monday 23 September 2013 09:33:54 Kevin Ottens wrote: > On Monday 23 September 2013 09:06:33 John Layt wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I am extremely relived to announce that QTimeZone finally got merged > > late late last night, thanks to the efforts of Thiago in fighting the > > CI system :-) Combine

Re: QTimeZone merged for 5.2

2013-09-23 Thread Kevin Ottens
On Monday 23 September 2013 09:06:33 John Layt wrote: > Hi, > > I am extremely relived to announce that QTimeZone finally got merged > late late last night, thanks to the efforts of Thiago in fighting the > CI system :-) Combined with other changes in QDateTime, this should > mean we're free of K

QTimeZone merged for 5.2

2013-09-23 Thread John Layt
Hi, I am extremely relived to announce that QTimeZone finally got merged late late last night, thanks to the efforts of Thiago in fighting the CI system :-) Combined with other changes in QDateTime, this should mean we're free of KDateTime and KTimeZone, albeit with a few caveats. I'll be doing