On Monday 09 December 2013 12:23:47 Martin Klapetek wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 12:22 PM, Martin Klapetek
>
> wrote:
> > In tier3 there are some frameworks with "KDE" prefix (kded, kdewebkit,
> > kdewidgets), what should happend with these? I'd change it for kf5 for
> > webkit and widgets -->
On Monday 09 December 2013 12:22:17 Martin Klapetek wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 8, 2013 at 7:03 PM, Kevin Ottens wrote:
> > Hello everyone,
> >
> > It is now really time to gear up toward the split. So from now on please
> > don't
> > create any new patches for the frameworks branch of kdelibs and put a
On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 12:22 PM, Martin Klapetek
wrote:
>
> In tier3 there are some frameworks with "KDE" prefix (kded, kdewebkit,
> kdewidgets), what should happend with these? I'd change it for kf5 for
> webkit and widgets --> kf5webkit and kf5widgets, not sure about kded.
> There's also KCMUtil
On Sun, Dec 8, 2013 at 7:03 PM, Kevin Ottens wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> It is now really time to gear up toward the split. So from now on please
> don't
> create any new patches for the frameworks branch of kdelibs and put all
> effort
> and priority toward getting the existing open patches in
On Sunday 08 December 2013 19:03:36 Kevin Ottens wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> It is now really time to gear up toward the split. So from now on please
> don't create any new patches for the frameworks branch of kdelibs and put
> all effort and priority toward getting the existing open patches in
>
Hello everyone,
It is now really time to gear up toward the split. So from now on please don't
create any new patches for the frameworks branch of kdelibs and put all effort
and priority toward getting the existing open patches in reviewboard properly
reviewed and pushed. We have to move fast i