Hi,
2012/7/9 Иван Комиссаров:
> I answered to them. They disagree with them in that case. For me is biggest
> priority is to port as much kde as code as possible.
getting code upstream into Qt is good, of course, but you can't expect
that the Qt people will accept KDE code without modifications.
On Monday 09 July 2012 18:05:07 Иван Комиссаров wrote:
> Ok, if KDE devs can live without tis signal, i can live too. However we
> could just rename it to something less specific than 'newTabrequested" but
> not confusing with doublClicked().
And we can also add an if() in the apps when porting th
Ok, that's very interesting, but i asked two questions and still don't see any
answer. No offence, Kevin, i just prefer discuss code, not my communication
skiils.
09.07.2012, в 18:34, Kevin Ottens написал(а):
On Monday 09 July 2012 15:46:25 David Faure wrote:
> PS: calling people stupid won't g
On Monday 09 July 2012 15:46:25 David Faure wrote:
> PS: calling people stupid won't get you far in terms of respect within the
> Qt community.
Or the KDE community for that matter: http://www.kde.org/code-of-conduct/
Regards.
--
Kévin Ottens, http://ervin.ipsquad.net
KDAB - proud patron of KDE,
Hm, previos message was rejected as spam:)
Ok, if KDE devs can live without tis signal, i can live too. However we
could just rename it to something less specific than 'newTabrequested" but
not confusing with doublClicked().
So, before i start other work with tabbar i would like to ask some
quest
On Monday 09 July 2012 17:26:46 Иван Комиссаров wrote:
> I answered to them. They disagree with them in that case. For me is biggest
> priority is to port as much kde as code as possible. And i didn't even try
> to port d'n'd related signals for same reasons as Jeremy says - API should
> be minimal
I answered to them. They disagree with them in that case. For me is biggest
priority is to port as much kde as code as possible. And i didn't even try
to port d'n'd related signals for same reasons as Jeremy says - API should
be minimal.
2012/7/9 Frank Reininghaus
> Hi,
>
> 2012/7/9 Иван Комисса
Hi,
2012/7/9 Иван Комиссаров:
> Hm, it seems that Qt guys are not very happy seeing KDE features in qt.
> I would like someone from KDE to participate in discussions about changes.
> For example, they insist that KTabBar functionality is not needed "as it can
> be easily implemented in subclass":)
Hm, it seems that Qt guys are not very happy seeing KDE features in qt.
I would like someone from KDE to participate in discussions about changes.
For example, they insist that KTabBar functionality is not needed "as it
can be easily implemented in subclass":)
https://codereview.qt-project.org/#cha
Hello,
On Thursday 28 June 2012 15:30:20 Иван Комиссаров wrote:
> On a qt5 mailing lists we've discussed possibility of adding come
> kde widgets to Qt5.
>
> I made a list of widgets i can try to add myself:
> [...]
It all sounds good to me, that's really nice to see you show up with such a
plan!
On Thursday 28 June 2012 13:30:20 Иван Комиссаров wrote:
> Hello. On a qt5 mailing lists we've discussed possibility of adding
> come kde widgets to Qt5.
>
> I made a list of widgets i can try to add myself:
>
> 1)
> http://api.kde.org/4.x-api/kdelibs-apidocs/kdeui/html/classKIntSpin
> Box.html"b
Hello. On a qt5 mailing lists we've discussed possibility of adding come
kde widgets to Qt5.
I made a list of widgets i can try to add myself:
1)
http://api.kde.org/4.x-api/kdelibs-apidocs/kdeui/html/classKIntSpinBox.html"base";
property can be added to QSpinBox.
2)
http://api.kde.org/4.x-api/kde
12 matches
Mail list logo
